- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harbaugh claims Patriots used illegal/deceptive tactics
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:41 am to TigerintheNO
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:41 am to TigerintheNO
That's Brady speak for "suck my cock losers"
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:47 am to CountryVolFan
quote:
The rules committee will kill this with quickness. But Denver or Indy has to prepare for it now as well.
As do the Patriots themselves, now that it's out there, right? Other coaches can attempt to use it against them. No problem.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:50 am to BuddyLAM
quote:
That term is stupid and I hope it ends soon
I disagree and will now start using the reference.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:01 pm to CountryVolFan
quote:
Why don't we just allow forward passes anywhere on the field and allow offenses to tackle rushing DL.
quote:
There is a baseline of rules that we need to operate under, identifying eligible receivers is one of those.
Sucks for them not knowing the rules.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:04 pm to lsusa
quote:
I laugh at the people who want to equate finding a loophole in the rulebook and using it to confuse a team, with a play action pass.
It isn't a loophole, and teams take advantage of this rule pretty regularly.
Don't let the facts get in the way of your narrative though!
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:15 pm to lsusa
quote:
I laugh at the people who want to equate finding a loophole in the rulebook and using it to confuse a team, with a play action pass.
Laugh at whatever you want, you'll still be wrong.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:28 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
He basically called the Pats innovators.
pretty much
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:35 pm to lsusa
quote:
I laugh at the people who want to equate finding a loophole in the rulebook and using it to confuse a team, with a play action pass.
why are you laughing?
successful football is about deception and confusing your opponent
you sound like a person who'd be bitching when the first defense implemented zone defense or a zone blitz
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:35 pm to wildtigercat93
I think it was legal. I've no problem with it in this game because it was simply an action within existing rules.
I'd also like to see stuff like this legislated out of existence.
I'd also like to see stuff like this legislated out of existence.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:37 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I think it was legal
You don't have to "think". It's clearly legal
If the ravens had an issue with it they should've blitzed the hell out of Brady when he only had 4 offensive linemen on the field protecting him
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:39 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:Ya know what I meant.
You don't have to "think". It's clearly legal
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:39 pm to wildtigercat93
On one of the plays, did they not have one of the ineligible receivers go down field?
If that's what I saw, then the patriots should have been penalized.
If that's what I saw, then the patriots should have been penalized.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:41 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
On one of the plays, did they not have one of the ineligible receivers go down field? If that's what I saw, then the patriots should have been penalized.
I don't think they did this, but if they did, harbaughs issue should be about a no call of an ineligible down field, and not calling out legal subs as deception because his defense couldn't figure it out
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:42 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:Dunno. If one did, that would definitely be a penalty. I'd have to go back and look. Seems that if it happened though, that would've already been covered.
On one of the plays, did they not have one of the ineligible receivers go down field?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:50 pm to Jcorye1
Pats fans are dropping bombs left and right in here
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:02 pm to ShortyRob
Nevermind, it was the vareen play and I thought gronk was the ineligible guy.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:27 pm to Jcorye1
No, it is a "loophole".
There are certain numbers that are eligible and others that are ineligible. The reporting rules were added as an exception (ie loophole) to that rule.
But that isn't really my point - I'm saying that comparing the "deception" involved on rules over jersey numbers vs actually playing the game (Ie faking a handoff on a play action pass, a counter play, reverse, pump fake, zone blitz, formation, etc) is incorrect .
Enjoy your cartoons and have a great day.
There are certain numbers that are eligible and others that are ineligible. The reporting rules were added as an exception (ie loophole) to that rule.
But that isn't really my point - I'm saying that comparing the "deception" involved on rules over jersey numbers vs actually playing the game (Ie faking a handoff on a play action pass, a counter play, reverse, pump fake, zone blitz, formation, etc) is incorrect .
Enjoy your cartoons and have a great day.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:32 pm to lsusa
quote:
There are certain numbers that are eligible and others that are ineligible. The reporting rules were added as an exception (ie loophole) to that rule.
Exceptions are not loopholes numb nuts
Loopholes are things that have not been thought of when rules are being made and not in the rule book
Something that is clearly stated in the rules is not a loophole. It's just shitty coaching and defense by the Ravens
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:34 pm to lsusa
You've been thoroughly destroyed in this thread
This is just another reason BB is the best coach of all time
This is just another reason BB is the best coach of all time
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News