- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Eli Manning Is The Worst QB to ever Win a SB
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:26 am to sms151t
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:26 am to sms151t
quote:
Okay you just are going to keep saying he doesn't belong in HOF I get it.
why would I change my mind? He doesn't have the numbers or the individual accolades compared to his peers. He has super bowl rings, a team accomplishment. Nothing about him has an individual would warrant HOF status
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:36 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Super Bowls are team accomplishments. Manning is an OK QB who had 2 nice runs. If he gets in the Hall and he probably will, to me it indicates a lowering of standards and the ultra lazy "RINGS" argument in which you are engaging.
My argument, which should have been indirectly insinuated, is the fact that quarterbacks winning multiple Super Bowls will, in all likelihood, be in the Hall of Fame. This includes Manning, who, statistically, is better than at least three players on that list.
He is not the worst QB to ever win a Super Bowl. He is not the best QB to ever win a Super Bowl. He is a good quarterback, who is, statistically, on par with a number of Hall of Fame quarterbacks with a couple big Super Bowl wins to his name, which is one of the largest calling cards when judging a quarterback.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:39 am to lsufan112001
quote:
I'd need to see some stats on that, but it is partly misleading since better QBs help their teams win enough games that they get some home playoff games and or a bye and don't have to win as many road games to get deep in the playoffs.
you have a point... but let's remember that road playoff QBs face a double whammy of A. not having the better team to begin with (as was proved during the season, otherwise they'd be home), and B. the playoff game atmosphere is more jacked up than in the regular season, as well as there being more likelihood of cold/bad weather in outdoor venues
so a road playoff win for a QB should be a significant accomplishment...
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:44 am to hoopsgalore
quote:
My argument, which should have been indirectly insinuated, is the fact that quarterbacks winning multiple Super Bowls will, in all likelihood, be in the Hall of Fame. This includes Manning, who, statistically, is better than at least three players on that list.
you cannot compare current stats to guys that played in the 60's and 70's the rules and offenses were much different. When you compare Eli's stats to his contemporaries he is very mediocre so all you have to go on is "RINGS".
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:44 am to lsufball19
So the 2nd best QB of the 70's does not need to be in the HOF because he does not have the numbers?
The NFL listed the QB's of the 70's
Staubach
Tarkenton
Bradshaw
ESPN and USA Today Lists
Staubach
Bradshaw
Tarkenton
I say he has the stats of his peers and being named to the all Decade team proves that.
The NFL listed the QB's of the 70's
Staubach
Tarkenton
Bradshaw
ESPN and USA Today Lists
Staubach
Bradshaw
Tarkenton
I say he has the stats of his peers and being named to the all Decade team proves that.
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 10:45 am
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:46 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
so a road playoff win for a QB should be a significant accomplishment...
not always does it mean they don't have as good a team, but the point is, you are effectively penalizing guys like Montana, Brady etc who don't have as many road wins because they win more games during the season and have a) fewer playoff games per year because they have a bye and b) get home games.
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 10:48 am
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:51 am to H-Town Tiger
Montana and Brady both have proven they can win on the road though. Montana won the 1988 NFC championship in frigid Chicago, and Brady won the 2004 AFC championship in frigid Pittsburgh.
To me, that's what makes a QB great. Can you get it done when the cards are stacked against you? (Road playoff games, awful weather, etc...)
IMO, Peyton would be looked at a whole lot differently if he had been able to pull off either the 2003 AFCCG or 2004 divisional round game in snowy New England. He played awful in both games.
To me, that's what makes a QB great. Can you get it done when the cards are stacked against you? (Road playoff games, awful weather, etc...)
IMO, Peyton would be looked at a whole lot differently if he had been able to pull off either the 2003 AFCCG or 2004 divisional round game in snowy New England. He played awful in both games.
This post was edited on 12/29/15 at 10:54 am
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:57 am to sms151t
quote:
being named to the all Decade team proves that.
no it doesn't. Those list fall back on RINGS just as much.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 10:59 am to VADawg
I was replying to a comment that Eli had the most road playoff wins (since mentioned that Flacco actually passed him). Its nice for those guys but misleading because even in the examples you provided Brady and Montana had to win 1 playoff road game to get to the SB because they were the #2 seeds
Posted on 12/29/15 at 11:19 am to sms151t
quote:
So the 2nd best QB of the 70's does not need to be in the HOF because he does not have the numbers?
The NFL listed the QB's of the 70's
Staubach
Tarkenton
Bradshaw
ESPN and USA Today Lists
Staubach
Bradshaw
Tarkenton
I say he has the stats of his peers and being named to the all Decade team proves that.
QBs with multiple all pro seasons in 1970s
Bob Griese
Frank Tarkenton
Ken Stabler
Roger Staubach also had 6 pro bowl appearances
Again, much like with the HOF, Bradshaw has always been viewed as better than he was because of his team's accomplishments
Posted on 12/29/15 at 5:04 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Yes, but I'm not sure why Young started all of 19 games for Tampa, that's not even 1 1/3 seasons. At least compare him to Vinny who was bad in Tampa, especially his first 3-4 years
Exactly . He almost had is career derailed with a franchise that Williams left.
What was Steve Young's excuse considering he was a decade after expansion while Doug stepped in only 2 years in?
Bo Jackson refused to go to the Bucs for personal & professional reasons ( probably a good decision). It was a putrid franchise ,but despite that Doug nearly went to Super Bowl with them............
I admitted Tampa had some good defenses ,but I mention Hebert & his pop gun arm not doing anything with great defenses in New Orleans as a comparison.
Good for Hebert completing a higher percentage when his pop gun ("cajun canon") arm barely completed a pass beyond 5 yards downfield to Eric Martin.
Doug Williams isn't 1-3 he is 4-3 in the playoffs with a SuperBowl ring & nearly 95 passer rating in the regular season & playoffs when he got on a respectable squad with the Redskins.
I've said nothing controversial here.
Posted on 12/29/15 at 5:54 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
Your insane. Doug Williams had one of the greatest days in super bowl history against the worst defense in super bowl history. He deserves credit but beyond that he was terrible. Look at his career stats. You can't even call him mediocre.
By what measure are the 87 Broncos the worst defense in Super Bowl history?
They were rank 7th in the League in scoring defense & 5th in pass defense overall.
They were fairly weak / mediocre against the run though.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News