- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/19/14 at 12:43 am to TH03
I love how Jimbo told the refs to watch out for Notre Dame picking and blocking downfield when those plays are Jimbo's bread and butter.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 1:16 am to TH03
Lou Holtz just said it was the right call. /thread
Posted on 10/19/14 at 2:03 am to TDawg1313
It did look like the defender initiated the contact, but the defender can do that within 5 yards of the line. It became a penalty when the receiver put his hands on the defender, and started blocking him. If the receiver would have stood his ground(basically shielding the defender) with his hands up in the air, then it would have been a legal play.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 2:36 am to TH03
LOL @ anyone bitching about that call.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 2:40 am to VA LSU fan
quote:
ACC got its championship last year and FSU will get to the playoffs this year. But no way can they beat Mississippi State or Alabama.
The Alabama team that beat Arkansas by one and the MSU team that has worse talent than FSU at every position?
Yeah no way FSU who hasn't lost in 23 games, could beat either of them
Posted on 10/19/14 at 2:51 am to TH03
It was a good call.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:15 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
Obviously he was trying to get around that block and was unable.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:10 am to themunch
quote:
I don't understand your theory. That the defenders could have easily got around it and closed on a wide open receiver but chose instead to defend guys not running routes?
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:18 am to TH03
Typical Notre Dame cry baby. Wow no one saw this coming. It was illegal plain and simple. Kelley is a fricking idiot. He says he teaches it the way it was done and he doesn't teach cheating. Yeah ok, whatever.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:27 am to Tactical1
Does anyone think if the roles were reversed and FSU was down 4, ran the same play, scored a TD with 6 secs left, that the same ref would have had the balls to make that call with the FSU crowd going bonkers? Hell no.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:42 am to TH03
Refs never help ND 
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:01 am to themunch
Yeah, that's OPI.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:28 am to EarthwormJim
Watch the play from the start. Which guy engaged first? The DB did.
The other point that many are missing is that FSU blew the coverage. They were bailed out by the call. That same DB did NOT have responsibility for the WR who caught the TD. Pretty simple to see on the review.
The other point that many are missing is that FSU blew the coverage. They were bailed out by the call. That same DB did NOT have responsibility for the WR who caught the TD. Pretty simple to see on the review.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:38 am to bayoujd
The call is okay and I can see why it happened.
But yes, youre right, FSU did not even attempt to guard Robinson...You can tell by Ramseys reaction (FSU DB) after the play that he was pissed at Darby.
But yes, youre right, FSU did not even attempt to guard Robinson...You can tell by Ramseys reaction (FSU DB) after the play that he was pissed at Darby.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:57 am to bayoujd
quote:
the play from the start. Which guy engaged first? The DB did.
No. Both receivers ran into the defenders and blocked them well into the endzone. The guy at the top of the screen was blatant PI.
quote:
The other point that many are missing is that FSU blew the coverage. They were bailed out by the call. That same DB did NOT have responsibility for the WR who caught the TD. Pretty simple to see on the review.
The coverage wasn't blown. One of the defenders was supposed to switch to the underneath route but couldn't because the receivers were blocking. Without the OPI that route is still open but it was that wide open because of the OPI.
So yeah, you could say that FSU was bailed out, but the receivers prevented any chance for FSU to make a play at the goal line. It's still a penalty that was correctly called.
Posted on 10/19/14 at 8:12 am to TH03
Best calls would have been a no-call or off-setting -defender was as/more involved than receiver. And the play was happening within 2 lousy yds of the line of scrimmage.
What was called not only negated the TD, it moved ND back to the 18 yd line. Off-setting would have at least allowed a reset.
Anyone have word on the official who threw the flag (SIAP)? FSU/ACC/FL ties by any chance?
What was called not only negated the TD, it moved ND back to the 18 yd line. Off-setting would have at least allowed a reset.
Anyone have word on the official who threw the flag (SIAP)? FSU/ACC/FL ties by any chance?
Posted on 10/19/14 at 8:19 am to Knight of Old
Id have preferred ND win but
two receivers were blocking DB's in the endzone, never looked to run any type route, hands all over them
had to be called and right call
two receivers were blocking DB's in the endzone, never looked to run any type route, hands all over them
had to be called and right call
Posted on 10/19/14 at 8:21 am to TH03
If your team was better they shouldn't have allowed the game come down to one play
Posted on 10/19/14 at 8:36 am to bayoujd
quote:
Does anyone think if the roles were reversed and FSU was down 4, ran the same play, scored a TD with 6 secs left, that the same ref would have had the balls to make that call with the FSU crowd going bonkers? Hell no.
I do. It was an unbelievably easy call.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News