re: CFB coaches poll released

quote:

---

I don't care but I don't get this ucla love fest around here. They are solid but playoff bound?

---

Because they know nothing about the history, culture, attitude and support of UCLA football.

It's a basketball school - always has been.

Gutty little Bruins might show up to play spoiler once and awhile...but they are no way ever mentally prepared to be the favorites and win.

Their greatest joy is to upset USC. That's what they live for...they certainly have no DNA for National Championships. It's not bias...it's a fact...living in the Pac-12. Stanford and UW have a far greater DNA to take that next step. Not UCLA...being good - for them...is enough praise.

People on here are assuming way too much. They don't understand the Pac-12 culture.

This is like making Ole Miss the favorite in the SEC b/c their QB is returning.

Damn you are butt hurt that UCLA owns that arse and will continue to for years to come

As long as they don't have more than 1 loss, the PAC 12 champ will likely be in the playoff

quote:

---

they certainly have no DNA for National Championships

---

Gotta start somewhere. But then again UCLA was a real good team in the 60's and 70's.

quote:

---

Stanford and UW have a far greater DNA to take that next step. Not UCLA

---

You are so stupid. I know you hate UCLA and LOVE USC but this year UCLA gonna do some serious damage to the pac-12. If they don't I will be the 1st one here to say I am wrong. BUT if UCLA somehow wins the conference and makes the playoff??? You will never show up to admit you are wrong. Bottom line is you are a USC homer POS.

quote:

---

the frick you gotta do that to me PEEJ?

---

No reason to worry this year bud. UCLA is gonna be just fine.

quote:

---

that don't carry any weight for supreme lack of knowledge

---

What do you want to know??? I follow EVERY conference. I am a TOTAL college football fan. You stay on USC privates all day long.

Hundley is a top 3 QB in the country, The o-line will be real good. USC has less talent than UCLA face it.

Its no different than the SEC where all people do here is harp how brutal it is year after year yet there's always a team that gets out with one or no losses

quote:

---

Its no different than the SEC where all people do here is harp how brutal it is year after year yet there's always a team that gets out with one or no losses

---

well yeah but the PAC has harder nonconference schedules and yall play the extra conference game and the championship... i think there's a consensus now that it's the 2nd best conference just ahead of the Big XII

UCLA has done nothing in my lifetime... they might upset USC every now and then but so does Ole Miss to LSU...

it would also help the PAC to get better mid-tier bowl tie ins... the champ plays in the Rose and that's good but the next tier of teams plays before New Year's day in the Alamo, the Holiday Bowl, Las Vegas Bowl etc. if yall played better teams in a bowl in Seattle or the new 49ers Stadium, it might help get more hype for a team like UCLA who needs it right now

quote:

---

UCLA has done nothing in my lifetime... they might upset USC every now and then but so does Ole Miss to LSU...

---

and? Just because UCLA had a rough first decade of the 2000s doesn't mean it won't do better going forward. UCLA has won the 2nd most conference championships in PAC football and has a winning record against everyone in the conference not named USC. UCLA has had its fair share of football success