- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Brady vs. Brees, stats don't lie.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 12/18/09 at 12:55 pm
This post was edited on 12/18/09 at 2:20 pm
9
Posted on 12/18/09 at 12:59 pm to southernelite
Statistically Brees is better. If you take away Brady's Madden-like 2007 season his stats are merely above average, however the guy knows how to win games and that can't be measured with statistics.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:07 pm to southernelite
Brady is better because he didn't suck balls for his first three seasons like Brees did. San Diego actually drafted a quarterback #1 in '04 even when they had a ton of needs because Brees sucked that badly. Now at their best, it's a tossup. Brees has an unbelievably quick release and does a great job with his reads. I love the way Brady operates in the pocket. His footwork is absolutely impeccable. If I had to choose one, I would go with Brady. He put up good numbers with no #1 receiver until Moss came along. Deion Branch, David Givens, David Patten and others have done nothing since leaving New England. Brady also didn't have the luxury of throwing the ball in a dome eight times a year. So, I would give the slight edge to Brady.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:29 pm to Bench McElroy
Brady..but you can be crazy and think Bree's.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:31 pm to southernelite
quote:
Speaking mainly on statistics, don't cheat as I will post the comparison shortly, just want to get opinions first.
Brady still has a statistical advantage I believe...ever so slightly though.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:32 pm to southernelite
Brees
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:41 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
San Diego actually drafted a quarterback #1 in '04 even when they had a ton of needs because Brees sucked that badly.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:43 pm to southernelite
Brady is the Robert Horry of football.
who is better, Karl Malone or Horry???
Brees > Brady
who is better, Karl Malone or Horry???
Brees > Brady
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:47 pm to displacedhorn
quote:
Brady..but you can be crazy and think Bree's
This is my favorite extra apostrophe ever
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:50 pm to lsu xman
quote:
Brady is the Robert Horry of football.
That is so stupid. Brady is racking up stats as well as Championships.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:52 pm to Kafka
and why do we take away his playoff bling in this comparions??? doesn't the playoff's show that he is also clutch. Just curious...
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:05 pm to HANSENBREATH
It always amazes me how people can calculate the play of 52 other people into the whatever formula they use to decide who's a better QB. 
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:06 pm to SJS Eagle 85
quote:
It always amazes me how people can calculate the play of 52 other people into the whatever formula they use to decide who's a better QB
You could apply that theory to pretty much anything in life then...
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:19 pm to Chad504boy
O, forgot my answer...BRADY
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:21 pm to southernelite
Brees is better than Brady.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:21 pm to HANSENBREATH
The point is, making the playoffs and super bowl is a team effort, making plays, which statistics reflect, are more accurate of an individual play.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:26 pm to southernelite
the most important stats posted on that chart is the TD/INT ratio, which Brady clearly has and edge in, so....Brady
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:29 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
He put up good numbers with no #1 receiver until Moss came along
While Colston is great and Meachem is emerging this year, I really don't think the saints have had a #1 receiver since Brees has been here.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:31 pm to charlottetiger
True, but Brady did miss 15 games last year, so that party accounts for his INT being a little lower than Brees. Also, take out 2007, and I think Brees has a pretty clear advantage, albeit slight.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:54 pm to charlottetiger
3 Super Bowl wins > 0 Super Bowl wins
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News