re: Boise State deserves a shot at being the National Champion

quote:

---

In 2007 there were 6 teams with records as good or better than LSU. Based on the logic in this thread all 7 should have shared the NC.

---

Are you reading the same thread as the rest of us?

quote:

---

Boise and Utah are the only two teams to go undefeated twice in the BCS era.

---

FSU used to go undefeated a lot before Miami and VT joined the ACC. Its fun to kick the shite outta schools that suck

quote:

---

Its Un-American

---

in that case...
keeping score is Un-American. they should just give everyone a trophy for playing hard hand having fun











:sar-fricking-casm:

quote:

---

Are you reading the same thread as the rest of us?

---

Do you not understand logic?

bitch please. Boise State?
Have you seen their schedule?

quote:

---

Have you seen their schedule?

---

yea. they beat two top 10 teams this year.

Every Boise State deserves a shot at being the National Champion.
The 1995 NCAA Basketball National Champion Villanova Wildcats had no chance against Georgetown but won the game by playing near perfect basketball to win the NC. It the tournament had not been expanded to 64 teams that year Villanova probably would not have made the tournament.

I'm just saying the kids and coaches representing a perfect record deserve a shot. The NCAA needs to fix this. And of course if you are in the NC game you don't care, you just want to win the game cause your team is there.

quote:

---

At some point the NCAA and BCS committee will have to recognize BSU if they keep winning...but this year...no they don't...they did nothing to prove they were better than the number 1 or number 2 ranked team...sometimes this is just the way the cookie crumbles...trust me, as an Auburn fan I know...

---

I disagree with this. Boise beat the PAC 10 champion and the Sun Belt champion. Their 2 best wins were as good as anyone in the country.

Here is the Texas schedule:

Sep. 5 La.-Monroe W 59-20
Sep. 12 at Wyoming W 41-10
Sep. 19 Texas Tech W 34-24
Sep. 26 Texas-El Paso W 64-7
Oct. 10 Colorado W 38-14
Oct. 17 Oklahoma W 16-13
Oct. 24 at Missouri W 41-7
Oct. 31 at OK State W 41-14
Nov. 7 UCF W 35-3
Nov. 14 at Baylor W 47-14
Nov. 21 Kansas W 51-20
Nov. 26 at Texas A&M W 49-39
Dec. 5 at Nebraska W 13-12
Jan. 7 at Alabama 7:00pm

There really didn't beat a good team all year. That doesn't mean they aren't a great team but with OU down, they had no big games. Nebraska, Oklahoma State, and Texas Tech were the best teams they played and they all had 4 losses and weren't good teams. Their out of conference schedule was a joke.

If Texas earned a shot to play for the championship, then so has Boise.

quote:

---

The truth is a lot of your major BCS teams are too scared to play teams like Boise. They would rather sit on their reputation as being a big name/superior football power.

Explain how playing a tougher schedule makes you a better team. Does a team that plays in the toughest division or conference in the NFL always win the Super Bowl? No! There's no reason the best team in the country can't be in a weaker conference. But the schools with the money and power control the BCS so we'll never really know.

---

The major difference is this isn't the NFL. The worst NFL team would beat the best college football team 10 out of 10 times. Yes, even Alabama this year. The Lions or Bucs would beat them.

quote:

---

Explain how playing a tougher schedule automatically makes you a better team

---

so why should a team that plays in a real conference and plays more top 25 teams and earns their way in should have to sit out because Boise plays shite all year. You dont see how that is an advantage? a playoff would be the same thing another team with one loss but played much more difficult teams would have gotten left out because of Boise and their weak schedule. There has to be an objectionable measurable to figure the playoff teams. NFL and CFB not the same there are only 32 NFL teams so you can bet there are 2/3 difficult games even if their division is crap.