- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better in their prime : Favre or Rodgers?
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:00 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:00 pm to AlbertMeansWell
will say Favre just of HOW he played the GAME... He had talent and had fun doing it..... Sure he was A gunslinger... But who cares??? He won more than he lost and took A TON of punishment but yet has the longest consecutive games played streak EVER................... 
3
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:03 pm to AlbertMeansWell
I grew up with Favre and would have to go with Rodgers. Rodgers just has an insane ability to take care of the ball and has the best arm talent in the league. Favre was a gunslinger and threw a lot of picks. Most notably, NFC championship 2009 at NOLA where if he throws the ball away they likely win with a FG and go to his 3rd Super Bowl.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:24 pm to dukke v
quote:and none of that means jack with the question asked
will say Favre just of HOW he played the GAME... He had talent and had fun doing it..... Sure he was A gunslinger... But who cares??? He won more than he lost and took A TON of punishment but yet has the longest consecutive games played streak EVER...................
Really isnt close. Rodgers is the best at their best
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:27 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
and none of that means jack with the question asked
Since your are A PUNK who knows NOTHING about football,,,, Ill give you A pass here... From MY view Favre LOVED the game and played it that way... BUT OF COURSE.. This IS the MSB where STATS are ALL that matter...............
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:29 pm to dukke v
How did I know your dumb arse would say Favre
If they played before 2000, your stupid arse will say they are better
If they played before 2000, your stupid arse will say they are better
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:30 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Favre. You can't possibly make a stat that takes into account having an alpha male leading the huddle.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:46 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
arm talent
This phrase is starting to irritate me.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:47 pm to dukke v
quote:
Favre LOVED the game and played it that way... BUT OF COURSE.. This IS the MSB where STATS are ALL that matter
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:48 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
If they played before 2000, your stupid arse will say they are better
SO.... Rogers is great... So What.. IN THEIR PRIME.... Favre was better....
Why you wat to be A TROLL????
OK I get it...
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:14 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Rodgers, but it's close. Favre was a monster in the mid-90s. The only QB on Favre's level at that time was Steve Young, but Favre balled on Young almost every time they played (Catch II notwithstanding).
Rodgers is simply the most efficient QB in the game in addition to being the total package talent-wise. For all of his elite throws, he doesn't force ANYTHING. Favre forced a ton and could sometimes get away with it. Rodgers calculates, then decides, then throws as needed, all in like half a second.
Rodgers is simply the most efficient QB in the game in addition to being the total package talent-wise. For all of his elite throws, he doesn't force ANYTHING. Favre forced a ton and could sometimes get away with it. Rodgers calculates, then decides, then throws as needed, all in like half a second.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:16 pm to dukke v
quote:
SO.... Rogers is great... So What.. IN THEIR PRIME.... Favre was better....
Why you wat to be A TROLL????
OK I get it...
Continue to add on to your reputation as a moron when it comes to sports
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:20 pm to AlbertMeansWell
quote:HAHAHAHHHAA
I think it’s Favre but damn
HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:21 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Brett Lorenzo Favre is my all time favorite athlete. I am a die hard sports fan because of the way he played the game. I was 7 years old when he took his helmet off in celebration of a TD pass in the Superbowl and that is the exact moment I fell in love with sports. Hell, that is my earliest memory. I never missed another Favre game. My dad took me to Green Bay in 2007 and it's my favorite memory between us. He is the toughest most down to earth good ol boy to ever play the game.
With all that, it is no doubt Aaron Rodgers. The thrill made Favre more exciting to watch, but Rodgers is in absolute control. He's unflappable. Always gets it done. Unbelievable the packers went back to back with these guys. It's without a doubt the best qb sequence of all time. I can't remember if Montana and Young were back to back but if they were it's still Favre to Rodgers.
Go pack go.
With all that, it is no doubt Aaron Rodgers. The thrill made Favre more exciting to watch, but Rodgers is in absolute control. He's unflappable. Always gets it done. Unbelievable the packers went back to back with these guys. It's without a doubt the best qb sequence of all time. I can't remember if Montana and Young were back to back but if they were it's still Favre to Rodgers.
Go pack go.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:24 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Brett Favre 1995-1997 over any other QB in history. And this was at a time when defense and the running game were legit.
40 year old Favre had his best statistical season in this 7-on-7 era we're in now. Rodgers is great but he benefits a ton from the style of football being played.
I don't see Rodgers throwing blocks on LBers 20 yards down field like Favre, either.
Sure, Favre was reckless at times throughout his career, especially in the 2000s but Favre at his best (95-97) over Rodgers at his best.
40 year old Favre had his best statistical season in this 7-on-7 era we're in now. Rodgers is great but he benefits a ton from the style of football being played.
I don't see Rodgers throwing blocks on LBers 20 yards down field like Favre, either.
Sure, Favre was reckless at times throughout his career, especially in the 2000s but Favre at his best (95-97) over Rodgers at his best.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:30 pm to AlbertMeansWell
In my totally unbiased opinion, Favre.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:43 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Favre was equally as fun to watch, but this isn' really close. Rodgers efficiency is off the charts.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:51 pm to AlbertMeansWell
It's close unlike what others are saying. Brett Favre was a badass
But it's still Rodgers. He's too damn good
But it's still Rodgers. He's too damn good
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:52 pm to dukke v
quote:
Sure he was A gunslinger... But who cares???
Like every NFL coach in the league...
Oh and Uh...his teammates and fans...
who don't want a pick 6 to lose the game. I think only John Madden didn't care.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:53 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Favre, hands down, no question.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:58 pm to goldenbadger08
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News