- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 95/96 Bulls, 98 Yankees, 85 Bears, or 01/02 Red Wings
Posted on 6/1/12 at 1:31 pm to Srbtiger06
Posted on 6/1/12 at 1:31 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
If he were here, Peej could tell us stories about watching them and catching foul balls.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:06 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
I agree that the '89 49ers were better, but they were 14-2 that year. They outscored their opponents in post season 126-26.
Bears outscored their opponents 91-10 that postseason. They also had 2 shutouts.
During the regular season the bears outscored their opponent 456-198. Niners were 442-253. Obviously the niners were a great team, but I think the Bears were better.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:27 pm to F machine
84 49ers were also 15-1 but never get the kind of love the 85 Bears get. I have never understood it. I think it's because the Bears had a D-Lineman play fullback or something. Great team but most overrated "best ever" type team by far.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:29 pm to tduecen
95-96 Bulls are overrated. Expansion year. They did average for a good championship team in the playoffs. Jordan even said that wasn't the best team he was on.
27 Yanks
27 Yanks
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:37 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
95-96 Bulls are overrated. Expansion year. They did average for a good championship team in the playoffs. Jordan even said that wasn't the best team he was on.
27 Yanks
Jordan's best team he was ever was the 27 Yanks? Didn't know that.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:45 pm to RedHawk
switzers sooners---47 in a row
woodens bruins---88 in a row
woodens bruins---88 in a row
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:47 pm to tduecen
85 Bears. They would kick the shite out of everyone.
The superbowl shuffle puts them over the rest.
The superbowl shuffle puts them over the rest.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:48 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
27 Yanks
you didn't watch them play
quote:
theunknownknight
Your vote comes off as agenda related regarding Jordan.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:28 pm to theunknownknight
Come on JD you are not PJ old you never saw the 27 Yanks play, hell all of the players and many of the players kids were dead by time you were born
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:31 pm to tduecen
As great as that Wings team was (and I'm biased here ) i'd still take the Bulls or Yankees teams ahead of them.
I wasn't alive for the 85 Bears
I wasn't alive for the 85 Bears
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:32 pm to tduecen
The 2012-2013 Miami Heat led by the big four (James, Wade, Bosh, and Nash) will end this discussion for the foreseeable future with a 74 win regular season and undefeated postseason
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:33 pm to MinnesotaTiger
quote:
Minnesota Tiger
LSU Fan
quote:
MinnesotaTiger
LSU Fan
Awesome and you guys posted back to back.
Ron Burgundy, just you did not see the team does not mean they cannot be the best. I do not remember the 1996 Bulls, so I guess they cannot be the best, right?
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:54 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
I vote for 27 Yankees
If you go by run differential, the '39 Yankees were better than the '27 Yankees and '98 Yankees. The '39 Yankees are the only team in MLB history to outscore the opposition by 400 runs or more. They also had a team ERA+ of 132 with seven pitchers winning ten games or more. Every starter in their everyday lineup reached double digits in homeruns back when homeruns were a lot harder to come by. And imagine how good they would have been if Gehrig hadn't been stricken with ALS.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:57 pm to tduecen
1998 Yankees was an amazing team.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 3:57 pm to NawlinsTigah270
Dont forget chandler also.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 4:09 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Just for consideration...
1998 Yankees
Hitting
965 Runs Scored - 1st in MLB
5.96 Runs/Game - 1st
1625 Hits - 2nd
207 HR - 7th
153 SB - 4th
1025 Ks - 6th in MLB
.288 BA - 3rd
.364 OBP - 1st
116 OPS+ - 1st
Pitching
3.82 ERA - 6th in MLB 1st in AL
1.251 WHIP - 2nd
116 ERA+ - 3rd
8.4 H/9 - 3rd
2.9 BB/9 - 3rd
2.32 K/BB - 4th
1998 Yankees
Hitting
965 Runs Scored - 1st in MLB
5.96 Runs/Game - 1st
1625 Hits - 2nd
207 HR - 7th
153 SB - 4th
1025 Ks - 6th in MLB
.288 BA - 3rd
.364 OBP - 1st
116 OPS+ - 1st
Pitching
3.82 ERA - 6th in MLB 1st in AL
1.251 WHIP - 2nd
116 ERA+ - 3rd
8.4 H/9 - 3rd
2.9 BB/9 - 3rd
2.32 K/BB - 4th
Posted on 6/1/12 at 4:20 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
switzers sooners---47 in a row
you are by about 20 games, Switzer only had one season when he won every game. I believe that Switzer sooners won 27 or 28 in a row
Posted on 6/1/12 at 5:03 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Ron Burgundy, just you did not see the team does not mean they cannot be the best.
I am not saying that at all. I'm saying voting for a team that you have little context on to how great they were makes your vote worthless. Like voting for the hottest chick and someone saying Cleopatra. The teams in question (don't forget the OP didn't mention them, therefore, not valid) all have recorded play for one to judge. The 27 Yanks have (possibly inaccurate) boxscores.
But for argument sake, if you never saw the Bulls play then no you have no idea what you talking about.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 5:50 pm to RonBurgundy
Why? You can look at the statistics and accomplishments and recognize that they were great teams.
It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that Murderer's Row or the Bulls with Jordan in his prime were all-time great teams.
It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that Murderer's Row or the Bulls with Jordan in his prime were all-time great teams.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News