Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

So why doesn't Berkshire split?

Posted on 8/1/16 at 5:44 pm
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22305 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 5:44 pm
Is Buffet screening his investors? Is this his way of ensuring only "serious" investors? Separating the wheat from the chaff, so to speak? Is he legally discriminating on who joins the club by keeping the share price out of reach of the common man? I often wondered about this.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 5:51 pm to
B shares baw
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 6:19 pm to
He wanted investors to hold the shares for extreme long term, having such a huge share price made it more difficult for a investor to sell just a part of their holdings as it increased in value. There are a considerable number of people that literally have one share as part of a portfolio.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 6:54 pm to
Supposedly it's simply because he doesn't want to pay the army of bankers and lawyers to do it.

Personally I think he should though, increased liquidity raises the value of a company.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 9:15 pm to
That doesn't make any sense. He paid them to issue b shares.
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53177 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Buffet screening his investors? Is this his way of ensuring only "serious" investors? Separating the wheat from the chaff, so to speak? Is he legally discriminating on who joins the club by keeping the share price out of reach of the common man? I often wondered about this.



Yeah, pretty much all of that. He purposely kept his stock illiquid so he would only attract sophisticated investors.

He wouldn't have created class B shares if he hadn't have been essentially forced to.

ETA: He also didn't want his shares bought by Mutual Funds, IIRC
This post was edited on 8/1/16 at 9:20 pm
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37105 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 10:24 pm to
Yes, he's looking for long term investors. Partners, if you will. Not day traders.

As far as the comment someone made about liquidity increasing value, that's only in the case of stock market value, and really only in the case of an acquisition target. No one is buying out Berkshire, and Warren has said many times the only value he cares about is net book.
Posted by raw dog
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
483 posts
Posted on 8/2/16 at 10:03 am to
Thought the reason was just to bifurcate voting rights. But any real institutional money has no problem with $200,000+ a share, and these are the investors that would cause trouble in any voting matter vs. the individual retail investor who usually just votes with management/proxy firms.
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 10:04 am
Posted by Judg7123
Member since Jan 2016
56 posts
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:50 pm to
The class B is worth 1/1500 of the economic value of A, but has voting rights of 1/10,000.

The long time Berkshire loyalists hold the A and others who have mentally bought in to his method.

it's part of the succession plan. Buffet himself has like a third or more of the A, and therefore very decent voting control.

When Buffet gives shares to fulfill his charitable pledges he converts those shares to class B first.

Big institutional could not buy up enough A to wrest control the volume is super low, for example 250 shares is avg daily volume.
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 1:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram