Started By
Message

re: Money in savings at different ages

Posted on 6/2/15 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
37694 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 5:02 pm to
Silly. It only matters what you are spending, not your salary.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32379 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 5:57 pm to
I'd shoot to save as much as possible, but don't freak out if you're in your late 20's and don't have a ton of money saved. I'm 27 and only have about 30k saved, but I also have a graduate degree and a wife with two years left of a 4 year professional program and our only debt is one car note. I know I'm behind the 8 ball versus some of my friends, but I'm confident I'll "catch up" when my wife gets out of school.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4409 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

As a matter of fact, it says my net worth is better for a 30 year old than it is for 26 year old. Something aint right.

Maybe it's adjusting for more 30 year olds being in early mortgage territory, so big debts against their assets?
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48896 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

low -0, average -0, and high -0


I didn't have savings. Too busy spending.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80099 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Your salary times your age divided by 20 should be your goal until your are 35, then the divisible factor should be 10, then at 50, the factor should be 5.

25 year old making $30,000 = $37,500 goal
35 year old making $60,000 = $210,000 goal
50 year old making $80,000 = $800,000 goal

This is all savings vehicles, including retirement accounts



Where did you get this from? Id love to see the info to back it up.

This is from Fidelity and jives pretty close with what other investment companies suggest

quote:

For example, by age 35, Fidelity suggests that you should have saved 1X your current salary, then 3X by 45, and 5X by 55. “Setting up clear goals linked to your salary can help simplify your planning, and help you determine if you are on track throughout your working life,” says Fidelity Executive Vice President John Sweeney. “Having such guideposts is particularly important in today’s workplace, where layoffs, job switching, longer life expectancy, and escalating health care costs can complicate your efforts to save for retirement.”
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18005 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Where did you get this from? Id love to see the info to back it up.



It came from the book "The Millionaire Next Door" by Dr. Thomas Stanley, PhD.The book is a favorite of mine and I employing his strategies has changed my family's financial life - and will change my family tree for my children and grand children.

Most of the concepts are fairly basic. You may not keep up with the Jones', but you will be the Jones.' For example, he suggests buying cars that are two model years behind and well kept, rather than new. He suggests staying away from status symbols and purchasing good quality goods. (A $300 Seiko does as well at telling you time as a $3000 Rolex).

For his savings model as reference above, he calls anyone that by age 35 that doesn't meet the criterion a UAW (under accumulator of wealth), which is most Americans. an average accumulator of wealth (AAW) is one that meets the criteria - and one that will retire very comfortably. Then there is the PAW - the Prodigious Accumulator of Waalth, the person who doubles up the AAW number (factor of five) - this is what you should strive to be, regardless of income. This is the level where it becomes hard to spend what you are making in interest in your later years.

Another thing he rails against is what he refers to as one of the biggest drains on wealth building - economic outpatient care. Don't support your adult children or adult siblings.

He's a big fan of insurance and using it as a wealth building tool as well. Everyone should have 10 times their income in term life insurance until they can self insure. If something happens to a father who makes $100,000 a year - a million in insurance should keep wife and kids living the same lifestyle.

He talks about "Million Dollar Choices." From the book synopsis:

Some of the financial choices that UAWs make are considered to be “million dollar choices” because if the choice hadn’t been made, the UAW would have in excess of a million dollars. One example of a million dollar choice is to smoke. Smokers and alcoholics tend to be UAWs because instead of building net worth, they spend their income to purchase alcohol or cigarettes. Another hypothetical example given in The Millionaire Next Door explains how a small purchase of cigarettes over a long period of time can accumulate a large sum of money. Mr. Friend’s poor parents were smokers and drinkers. They smoked at least three packs of cigarettes a day during the week. Three packs a day over 46 years translated into a sum of money that exceeded the value of their home by $33,000.[1] Even more extraordinary, if the Friends had invested and reinvested that money over a 46-year period, the portfolio would have exceeded $2 million. The value of a small amount of money over a long period of time is amazing. A UAW makes choices that, although financially insignificant at the present value, have a very significant future value. Choices such as drinking two cases of beer a week, smoking several packs of cigarettes a day, and buying large amounts of unnecessary food and objects are some examples of typical UAW choices. These choices are not necessarily large financial purchases right now, but over a long period of time, the opportunity cost of that money is very expensive.

Its not for everyone but I believe the book is a must read for any young person interested in personal finance. I have given it as part of college graduation and wedding gifts in the past.
This post was edited on 6/2/15 at 8:22 pm
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80099 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 6:42 am to
I don't think I know or have known a single 25yr old making 30k a year who has saved 37k.

If you graduate at 22-23 and start off making 30k, you'd have to put away 50% of your pre-tax salary to get there. That is insane

More realistic would be 37k for a person making 30k at the age of 30.

I'm not saying the idea isn't great in order to get set up for the long run, but it isn't realistic to 99% of people in that situation.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 8:31 am to
About smoking and alcohol, I won't give up drinking to save a little money. Not yet at least
Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3450 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Your salary times your age divided by 20 should be your goal until your are 35, then the divisible factor should be 10, then at 50, the factor should be 5. 25 year old making $30,000 = $37,500 goal 35 year old making $60,000 = $210,000 goal 50 year old making $80,000 = $800,000 goal This is all savings vehicles, including retirement accounts


In the nicest way possible, this is the most delusional and out of touch with reality statistic I've ever seen on the money board.
Posted by yellowhammer2098
New Orleans, LA
Member since Mar 2013
3850 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Silly. It only matters what you are spending, not your salary.



Agreed. The important question isn't: What's your salary?.. The important question is: How much money do you have in the bank?

ETA: Not bank as in savings/checking accounts. I mean it more in terms of net worth/investments.
This post was edited on 6/3/15 at 9:12 am
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18005 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 9:13 am to
quote:

In the nicest way possible, this is the most delusional and out of touch with reality statistic I've ever seen on the money board.



It isn't my metric. Its Thomas Stanley's. Lots of folks on the Money Board have pointed to him.
Posted by Oizers
Member since Nov 2009
2641 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 9:19 am to
What is the author's end goal with the money? Is it to just say he grew his wealth to x dollars, or is to eventually spend money however he wants to?
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18005 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 9:48 am to
quote:

What is the author's end goal with the money? Is it to just say he grew his wealth to x dollars, or is to eventually spend money however he wants to?


Its up to the person. Many of the people he interviewed planned to leave significant estates behind, but quite a few were traveling the world, doing whatever they wanted to do.

Its boring - but I grew up never having a HHI more than 30k. I'm changing my family tree.

Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9847 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 10:17 am to
What I don't understand is that addition of one's value of time into these equations.


Time is our most valuable asset. We only have a certain amount.

To me, if there was a way to subtract the cost of increasing the value of time spent would be a better way to look at it.

Not so much in the area of "are you saving money or wasting money"?


It just seems silly to judge success based on ones "net worth"...
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24949 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 12:00 pm to
98.75% of 34 yr olds

Can't say i did it on my own though.
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Atlanta GA - ITP
Member since Sep 2012
24933 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 12:59 pm to
A new college graduate would be 22 or so right? So not much difference there. If you have any money in savings at 21 or 22 that's way better than I was.

Every paycheck I got in college went towards bar tabs and rent.
This post was edited on 6/3/15 at 1:03 pm
Posted by LSUAfro
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
12775 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

I'm changing my family tree.
Till your kids blow it on alcohol and smokes.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72503 posts
Posted on 6/3/15 at 9:53 pm to
not bad goals but everyone needs different amounts to live on so a better indicator is do you have enough PASSIVE income to pay ALL your expenses right now? If so, then you are technically retired.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72503 posts
Posted on 6/4/15 at 2:02 pm to
Yep. Debt service is a huge factor.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55219 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 8:24 am to
quote:

25 year old making $30,000 = $37,500 goal 35 year old making $60,000 = $210,000 goal 50 year old making $80,000 = $800,000 goal




This only makes sense if your income increases at a small consistent rate.
If you made a working persons (blue collar) wage of 28k until you were 35 but then jumped to 150k or much more after that the formula is fubar.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram