Started By
Message

re: Just hired my first employee, employer tax question?

Posted on 10/17/16 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17258 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

65 which is the payroll fee


my math still shows closer to 80, but whatever, and that is WAY to high for a one person payroll, shop it around and look into QB payroll feature
Posted by PrettyBird
Aspen
Member since Feb 2010
10358 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

You will be exposing yourself to all kinds of penalties and back taxes if he is found to be en employee.



In an audit of one employee? Couldn't you just judge the whole contractor relationship? Wouldn't it be smarter to keep a person as 1099 until you either have more than 1 employee or you build up your revenue? I don't see the harm in putting your one employee as 1099 if you are a smaller start up. But I may be way off.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37084 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

In an audit of one employee?


The number of employees is not relevant, except that math tells us that perhaps your chance of being selected for an audit *might* be slightly less the fewer employees you have. But it's not a significant amount less.

quote:

Couldn't you just judge the whole contractor relationship?


A contractor relationship is not the same as an employee relationship, thus, the entire area of law that this involves. There is a 20 factor test that is used, but really, it revolves around control.

quote:

Wouldn't it be smarter to keep a person as 1099 until you either have more than 1 employee or you build up your revenue?


Smarter? It would be financially better, but the government knows that... hence... the laws the way they are.

quote:

don't see the harm in putting your one employee as 1099 if you are a smaller start up


quote:

But I may be way off.


You are way off, but it's a common misconception. Whenever a client uses the phrase "1099 employee" I lose my shite. Seriously. I tell them I never, ever, ever, ever want them to use that phrase as long as they live.

Employees get W-2. Contractors get 1099. The quickest way to get yourself in a heap of mess is to refer to anyone getting a 1099 as an employee.

It may seem like semantics, but it can cause you a whole lot of heartburn.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 2:16 pm
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37084 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

really only 65 which is the payroll fee.


I hope this is some sort of upfront annual fee for the most part, and you will not be paying $65 per payroll cycle.

If it is... you need to find other providers immediately.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37084 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:24 pm to
quote:


Yep. Friend of a friend is going through this now. He's perilously close to losing his business over it. 3+ years of back taxes on 3 "employees."


And if the IRS really wants to be pricks about it... they can not only impose this, but if he doesn't pay it, they can impose the trust fund penalty, which basically makes him personally liable for the money, even if the LLC closes.

I've only seen it done once, as the trust fund penalty is usually only applied for companies that collect payroll tax and don't send it on. But the one time I saw it, it was a pretty terrible case of claiming them as contractors. They had no support whatsoever for that, and when the IRS said they were going to reclassify them as employees, the owners basically said screw you, we will just shut the LLC down. IRS didn't like that response and brought out the nuke bombs.
Posted by gsvar2004
Member since Nov 2007
7954 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:36 pm to
It is 65 per payroll. Im guessing that's too high from the comments I see here. It was by way of referral and I was unaware how much it cost.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 2:44 pm
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37084 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

It is 65 per payroll. Im guessing that's too high from the comments I see here. It was by way of referral and I was unaware how much it costed.


You may be getting gouged for some kind of minimal fee.

I would look at this... even their full service is less than that.

Intuit payroll

If you are willing to do some of the work yourself, it's even less.

EDIT: Intuit payroll is the same thing as Quickbooks payroll, FYI

A lot of people have had success with Netchex. But their pricing varies.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 2:45 pm
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35531 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

really only 65 which is the payroll fee.


Why on earth are you paying a payroll fee for an employee that makes $220 a week? Get your arse on QuickBooks and do your own payroll.
Posted by PrettyBird
Aspen
Member since Feb 2010
10358 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:47 pm to
I meant to say fudge, ha.

But I get that smaller companies would often blur that line, most on purpose. I also would question how would IRS be able to prove that one person who does work for you is an employee vs contractor?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37084 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

I also would question how would IRS be able to prove that one person who does work for you is an employee vs contractor?


Facts and circumstances, mainly based on control.

I hire you to come to my office from 8 am to 5 pm daily, to answer the phone, greet customers, make copies, etc. I give you a space to do it. I pay you by the hour. You are an employee. You get a W-2.

I need marketing work done. I hire you to come up with some logos for my firm, paperwork, etc. I sign a contract with you that says I'll pay you $2,000 for the work. You work at your own office or your house. We meet to go over the work, which I eventually approve. I don't control your schedule, just tell you I need the logo by a certain date. When you are finished that project, we are done. You are a contractor and get a form 1099.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 3:04 pm to
Yeah, I don't know all the ins and outs of this guy's situation, but I do find it hard to believe he's on the verge of losing his business over just 3 employees. He seems to be doing really well(niche software developer) and can absorb the penalties and back taxes, though they would still hurt.


I do know he tried to blame it on his CPA until they showed him a letter they sent him alerting him to the problem and telling him he needed to fix it. He ignored the letter.
Posted by PrettyBird
Aspen
Member since Feb 2010
10358 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 3:06 pm to
Thanks - I think I fully understand what makes a person an employee vs a contractor, more so wondering the ways around it as a non law abiding citizen and all.

But, good examples.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35531 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 3:22 pm to
It really isn't worth the effort. The cost isn't much and there are legal ways around benefits if that is your concern.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158758 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 4:05 pm to
DOL is the one that's really cracking down on it
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158758 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

If you are willing to do some of the work yourself, it's even less.

EDIT: Intuit payroll is the same thing as Quickbooks payroll, FYI

A lot of people have had success with Netchex. But their pricing varies.


there are also plenty of places that specialize in doing it for the small businesses to keep your fees to a minimum. fricking up your payroll can turn into a giant mess, typically recommend sucking up the fees to get it done correctly.
Posted by DayBowBow
Member since Jun 2011
5038 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Why on earth are you paying a payroll fee for an employee that makes $220 a week? Get your arse on QuickBooks and do your own payroll.


I work for a municipal tax office and have gotten multiple checks for a penny from payroll companies, that's what your're paying for.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 6:34 pm
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35531 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 7:56 pm to
QuickBooks cost us $1.25 per check to do direct deposit for our employees. That's the total of our fees. My wife has a bookkeeping service and the software module for her to do my payroll costs $200 a year. The fees are minimal.
Posted by kingDYL
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
77 posts
Posted on 10/19/16 at 12:46 am to
There were a few people that posted replies that were almost fully correct, but none completely (mainly being off on SUI in Louisiana). Here is the exact breakdown...

Employer Per Pay Period Tax Responsibilities:
SS: 6.2%
MC: 1.45%
FUTA: 0.6% for the first $7,000 each employee makes
SUI: 0.1%-6.2% for the first $7,700 each employee makes (new businesses in 2016 are usually assigned the New Business Rate of 1.83%-3.2% by the LWC)

Also- that per pay period rate is high if you have only one employee. I'm a Payroll Consultant for Paychex in Baton Rouge (been doing this almost 5 years now), and see this every day. Hope it all works out! If you have any questions ever though (or want a quote that's much less than what you're paying), let me know!

Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37084 posts
Posted on 10/19/16 at 9:12 am to
quote:

(new businesses in 2016 are usually assigned the New Business Rate of 1.83%-3.2% by the LWC)


When doing planning for businesses planning to hire their first employee, we project a 2.05 initial base rate for LWC, knowing that when the app is submitted based on industry they may receive a slighly higher or lower base rate. Do you think that is still a decent projection?

quote:

I'm a Payroll Consultant for Paychex in Baton Rouge


Do you know Logan from the New Orleans office area? Total smokeshow.
Posted by kingDYL
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
77 posts
Posted on 10/19/16 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

When doing planning for businesses planning to hire their first employee, we project a 2.05 initial base rate for LWC, knowing that when the app is submitted based on industry they may receive a slighly higher or lower base rate. Do you think that is still a decent projection?


It isn't a bad estimate at all, since it's between the new business rate of 1.83-3.2%. But to be perfectly honest, when applying for the SUI Number with LWC Online, I think I've had a total of two instances when the rate was above 1.96%. Almost all are 1.83-1.87% if you apply for it correctly and work with the state to get the lowest rate.

And yes- I know Logan very well! She's awesome!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram