Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Is it time for the Warren Buffet strategy?

Posted on 6/23/23 at 7:22 pm
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7464 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 7:22 pm
"Buffett made the bet in December 2007, arguing that a fund holding the same stocks as found in the Standard & Poor's 500 index could beat the combined performance of a group of hedge funds over the following 10 years." He won.

I have stuff every where. I have a financial advisor that takes a rake or a fee when I buy into a fund. Target date stuff in the 401k. Blah, blah, blah.

Just like Whole Life, Reverse Mortgages, Loaded Funds, and Structured Notes; I have heard, "dump the financial advisor and pay by the hour if you need him/her."

OK MT, I'm 40. I've been thinking about just going all in on a tiny fee, something like Vanguard, S&P 500 index fund, and dropping "my money guy".

Thoughts?
Posted by BeaumontBengal
Member since Feb 2005
2334 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 7:28 pm to
Dump the financial advisor and buy VTSAX.
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
42484 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 7:51 pm to
VTSAX and chill my dude
Posted by Costanza
Member since May 2011
3151 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 8:36 pm to
No brainer.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
1164 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:05 am to
Warren is right more than he is wrong.

At age 40, consistently putting your own money in is probably more important than what you put it in and whether you go advisor or discount.


There are some good low cost options if you want to go that route.

VTSAX, VOO, Russell 1000, Russell 2000, QQQ
Posted by jlsufan
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2021
262 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:09 am to
The dead outperform the living
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3118 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:31 am to
This is solid advice and has been known for a very long time. Those in the industry don't want you to know or believe it.
Posted by RedlandsTiger
Greenwell Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2008
2939 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 9:02 am to
If you don't need it for 20 years, put it in XSD or SOXX and keep contributing every month (preferably in a Roth).
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40858 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 9:05 am to
quote:

put it in XSD or SOXX and keep contributing every month (preferably in a Roth).



Semiconductor business is pretty cyclical. A small portion of my portfolio sure... But definitely wouldn't put the bulk of my retirement funds in one specific sector.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24151 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 10:51 am to
For majority of people, financial advisors are more like psychologists or counselors than having world changing portfolio advice.

I think the higher net worth individuals should have someone who helps with tax strategy as that will pay for itself and often times needs to be thought of decades in advance.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33406 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 11:23 am to
quote:

"Buffett made the bet in December 2007, arguing that a fund holding the same stocks as found in the Standard & Poor's 500 index could beat the combined performance of a group of hedge funds over the following 10 years." He won.
A few caveats:

I believe he sold puts on the S and P rather than just buying SPDR or whatever. That gave him a lot of leverage that is likely not advisable for the little guy.

Also, I think he used a fund of funds for the benchmark to beat - that is super high fee, inefficient way to access hedge funds.

And consider: the shape of your equity curve matters. 15 months after December 2007, your stocks were down like 50%. You had no dry powder. Had you had some "alternative investments" - like hedge funds - you likely would have been down way less, and possibly could have been on the offensive in the cheapest market in 75 years. There's also a psychological benefit to not living day to day knowing your net worth has been halved.

So, I am in qualified agreement with Buffett - but it sure helps to be mega rich first.

I agree with others in the thread that if it's truly 25-40 year money, indexing is great.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3118 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 11:25 am to
Paying a financial advisor a percentage of your money results in "world-changing" portfolio performance in a terrible way.
Posted by natsoundup
Simpsonville, SC, Jupiter, FL,
Member since May 2013
367 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 1:14 pm to
If I were young, I would go with VTSAX…but since I am retired it’s preferreds, baby bods and CEF’s. The income is fantastic
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4101 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

I believe he sold puts on the S and P rather than just buying SPDR or whatever. That gave him a lot of leverage that is likely not advisable for the little guy.


Indeed he did. As best I can remember, from 2004 to 2008 or so, he sold various tranches of puts on the S&P 500 that expired as late as 2026. The premiums collected were somewhere around $4 billion. Of course, like any insurance company would, he/Berkshire invested those proceeds over the years to expiration… further expanding his profits. None of the short puts have thus far expired in the money.

As he did with these short premium trades, Warren is able to mostly keep his derivatives trading close to the vest, and the story only becomes known once required filings are made public. So most people only think of him as a great investor, when he actually makes some of his greatest returns from derivatives trading.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7464 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 9:59 pm to
Team MT.

Thanks for the great feedback.

quote:

For majority of people, financial advisors are more like psychologists or counselors than having world changing portfolio advice.


I feel this is me. I like my guy but mainly to chat with and discuss market forces with.

quote:

I believe he sold puts on the S and P rather than just buying SPDR or whatever. That gave him a lot of leverage that is likely not advisable for the little guy.
good point. the idea is sound, sell puts on $SPY and invest the premium in $SPY. As always , nothing is a sure thing.

quote:

Indeed he did. As best I can remember, from 2004 to 2008 or so, he sold various tranches of puts on the S&P 500 that expired as late as 2026. The premiums collected were somewhere around $4 billion.
mind blown

I’m thinking in the end it just makes sense to index and go from there. I just hear too many people saying ditch the financial advisor. I’m no way rich enough to need one
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33406 posts
Posted on 6/24/23 at 11:45 pm to
I certainly agree with pure indexing in retirement accounts.

For non-retirement money, there's a place for doing something other than stocks.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35336 posts
Posted on 6/25/23 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

"Buffett made the bet in December 2007, arguing that a fund holding the same stocks as found in the Standard & Poor's 500 index could beat the combined performance of a group of hedge funds over the following 10 years." He won.

I have stuff every where. I have a financial advisor that takes a rake or a fee when I buy into a fund. Target date stuff in the 401k. Blah, blah, blah.

Just like Whole Life, Reverse Mortgages, Loaded Funds, and Structured Notes; I have heard, "dump the financial advisor and pay by the hour if you need him/her."

OK MT, I'm 40. I've been thinking about just going all in on a tiny fee, something like Vanguard, S&P 500 index fund, and dropping "my money guy".

Thoughts?


Dump him. 98% of people have no "need" for a money guy.

My parents have probably lost tens of thousands (if not more) in percentage fees over the years and I would be shocked if they have outperformed or even matched the market. I tell them yearly to drop him and just do it themselves but they aren't interested. Oh well, guess it's worth it to my dad to work an extra year or 3.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123937 posts
Posted on 6/26/23 at 8:03 am to
quote:

going all in on a tiny fee, something like Vanguard, S&P 500 index fund, and dropping "my money guy".

Thoughts?
Has your "money guy" performed at par with a contrarian risk hedge (e.g., betting long but with downside protection), or has he outperformed the market with fees included? If so, it would be prudent to stand pat.

If an S&P Index Fund would do better, you have your answer.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1423 posts
Posted on 6/26/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:

My parents have probably lost tens of thousands (if not more) in percentage fees over the years


My parents when they retired were using a financial advisor to manage their investments. At the time, I was in my early 30s and had made the switch to primarily index funds.

I considered managing their investments as well. But I was very hesitant as I didn't want to mess up their retirement. Also their portfolio was prob 6-8x mine at the time which was a bit daunting. My parents had no desire to handle this themselves.

So I let it be for a couple years and compared performance between the advisor and myself. Once I felt comfortable that the advisor wasn't doing a better job than me; I took it over. I've saved them at least $100k in fees over the years. What many people don't realize are the hidden fees of advisors using expensive funds vs low cost index funds.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram