Started By
Message

Is Intel dead money?

Posted on 2/9/23 at 5:31 pm
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15762 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 5:31 pm
Are they going out of business?

Is the dividend safe?

I saw the insiders are buying so I’m intrigued.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84753 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 5:57 pm to
It’s the ATT of the chip world.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84753 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 6:00 pm to
Is it still dead money is probably the better question. It’s absolutely been dead money over the last 23 years.

ETA- as in an investor 23 years ago, who has reinvested dividends, would have less money today than when they started.
This post was edited on 2/9/23 at 7:40 pm
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4083 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

It’s the ATT of the chip world.


Very good analogy.

Another poster was talking it up a few months back because of the CHIPS Act and onshoring of production. And while that’s all well and good, their primary issues are more to do with their products, not where they’re produced. And tax breaks can’t fix that issue either.

I don’t follow NVDA that closely, but when AMD was in the 50-60 range a little while back, that was a Black Friday price range.

Disclaimer: AMD has been good to me over the years. I don’t recall that I’ve ever been long INTC, other than maybe some options plays.
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40840 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 6:32 pm to
Cyclical business that pays a decent yield. I think with governments around the world paying for their foundry business, they will be in a strong position to drive profits. However it won't happen over night. So probably nothing exciting in the near term.

I don't think there is any chance they go bankrupt. Too important to national security.

Don't think many on this board agrees with me though
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
13616 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 6:58 pm to
I would not want to buy a stock competing with NVDA and AMD over the next five years. Intel’s last quarter was as bad as it gets. That continues to be a theme with Intel, though.
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40840 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 7:00 pm to
Nvidia and AMD are not truly direct competitors. They do not produce their own chips. TSMC will ultimately decide their pricing until someone catches them
Posted by Beerinthepocket
Dallas
Member since May 2011
851 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 7:04 pm to
I’m a buyer, when China invades Taiwan later this decade it should pop significantly.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84753 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Nvidia and AMD are not truly direct competitors. They do not produce their own chips. TSMC will ultimately decide their pricing until someone catches them


Intel designs subpar chips compared to AMD and NVDA, and their fab is subpar compared to TSMC. It’s the worst of both worlds.
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4083 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

I’m a buyer, when China invades Taiwan later this decade it should pop significantly.


I think you might want to zoom out and consider the big picture if that happens.
This post was edited on 2/9/23 at 8:18 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84753 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:22 pm to
While we’re on this chip topic, I think ASML is by far the most attractive play here. You literally cannot make a high end chip without their EUV machines.
Posted by hob
Member since Dec 2017
2127 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Intel designs subpar chips compared to AMD and NVDA, and their fab is subpar compared to TSMC. It’s the worst of both worlds.


and doesn't have anything in the pipeline to change this
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
5977 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:35 pm to
They are the dinosaur of the chip sector. AMD and others have been lapping them for years.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89490 posts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

It’s the ATT of the chip world.



I was going to do a little analysis, but this really says it better and more elegantly than I would/could have.
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40840 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 8:49 am to
quote:

I was going to do a little analysis, but this really says it better and more elegantly than I would/could have.


I do not mind the ATT analogy, except they did not take on the massive debt that ATT piled on to buy other businesses that they later sold at a lost. HBO and DTV.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84753 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:01 am to
quote:

do not mind the ATT analogy, except they did not take on the massive debt that ATT piled on to buy other businesses that they later sold at a lost. HBO and DTV.


Yeah they got there in different ways. They’ve squandered a lot of capital, it just wasn’t on a massive purchase.
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40840 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:06 am to
ATT sitting on 130B of debt, after selling off the pieces down from 180B. Debt to Equity ratio of 1.395

Intel is only at 38B, with a debt to equity ratio of 0.41

They are not really comparable on what they have borrowed

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84753 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:26 am to
quote:

They are not really comparable on what they have borrowed


No, they’re not, and I’m not trying to imply they are.

My point is that they’ve been poor stewards of capital all the same. Intel is in much better shape from a balance sheet standpoint - no argument there - but they took a massive head start and money and let two nobodies in NVDA and AMD usurp them.

All that being said, both INTC and T can be a good buy at the right price. They’re both reasonably cheap right now.
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40840 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 10:27 am to
quote:

My point is that they’ve been poor stewards of capital all the same


That is fair assessment. While I disagree their push into expanding their foundry business is a bad investment. I guess we will only find out with time.
Posted by leeman101
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2020
1496 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Is the dividend safe?


That is a good question since Intel pays a healthy dividend where AMD pays nothing and Nvidia pays next to nothing. The later two might be plowing the money back into the business instead of passing it on to shareholders, fueling growth.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram