- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: your thoughts on danielson's 6-team playoff proposal
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:19 am to white beans
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:19 am to white beans
I think he reads TD. I coulda sworn I'd put that on the MSB a yr or 2 ago. at least the 6 team/ top 2 bye part. I didn't factor in the conf champ part.
I always thought the hang up would be bickering over the top 2 getting a bye.
I always thought the hang up would be bickering over the top 2 getting a bye.
2
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:20 am to ATLTiger
any scenario involving home games is going to cause a shite storm
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:21 am to wheelz007
College higher ups wouldn't go for that ....too much $ possible ....1 or 2 teams could make money from 3 major bowls
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 10:23 am
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:21 am to SlowFlowPro
oh, did he propose home games? in my scenario, the games are played at the current BCS sites + Jerry World. 5 games, the 5 big venues. rotate the Final Four/ Championship. everybody's happy.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
don't care
I do and FU.
quote:
are there 6 teams right now with a legit argument of being the best team?
This year I think there only one. You cant change the system based on how many have legit chance. Of course, for a while Wisconsin was considered a legit contender which may be no. 5 now.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:26 am to ATLTiger
quote:
I always thought the hang up would be bickering over the top 2 getting a bye
No. 3 that didn't get the bye or the team that missed being in top-6 will will whine. It's no different from current whining.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:26 am to LSUguerilla
quote:
I loved that idea. Love the bye for top two.
I liked it also. Had never really heard of that before last night but it is the best proposal I have heard yet. The bye rewards the two top teams and the then anyone else who has a good arguement to get in gets in. I also liked that a committee would select the teams instead of polls and computers.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:26 am to YellowShoe
quote:
You cant change the system based on how many have legit chance
well you have to get in a # that takes this into account and lets in the fewest number of teams without an argument
4 seems to be the number that would work in almost every year (including this one). i don't see why we need more than 4
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:27 am to boxcar willie
quote:
I also liked that a committee would select the teams instead of polls and computers.
oh yeah a secret committee without any sort of repercussions for bad choices is so much better
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:30 am to white beans
Better than what we have now, and anything the BCS has had, and frankly will ever be able to come up with.
Works for me. I like that, the plus one or even 8. I think any higher than 8 is too much.
Works for me. I like that, the plus one or even 8. I think any higher than 8 is too much.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:32 am to white beans
it's stupid because there are ppl picking the playoff teams... so what's different?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:34 am to RobDione
quote:
it's stupid because there are ppl picking the playoff teams... so what's different?
it's worse. i assume this committee would be like the CBB committee, which would be much worse. more secrets and backroom deals
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:45 am to RobDione
quote:
it's stupid because there are ppl picking the playoff teams... so what's different?
The difference is 6 teams instead of two. much rather the debate be about who 5,6,7 and 8 are than 1,2,3 and they can play it out from there and finally take the "M" off and just have an NC.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:47 am to Tiger Ugly
quote:
much rather the debate be about who 5,6,7 and 8 are than 1,2,3
illogical. they're all the same argument
quote:
and finally take the "M" off and just have an NC.
not true. this will only happen if you allow all 11 conference champs in the system
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:04 pm to SPEEDY
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News