Started By
Message

Would a running/mobile QB help or hurt Guice and LF's ypc average?

Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:39 pm
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43092 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:39 pm
Of course it would be good if our QB was a run threat as well as a good passer but do you think Guice et al would find more or less running room?

For comparison:

Bama's RB Damien Harris averages 8.1 ypc and Guice averages 8.0 ypc.

Bama's QB Hurts has 840 rushing yds (5.5 ypc) while Etling has 44 yds rushing (1.2 ypc).



Discuss
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7806 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:42 pm to
I believe that running the option with a mobile q.b. would definitely benefit the two.
Posted by Wind
Member since Nov 2016
854 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Guice et al would find more or less running room?


Less. Teams need to respect that you'll hit them with the pass, otherwise they play downhill and load the box.
Posted by ole yeller
Bates Motel
Member since May 2009
1938 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:43 pm to
I think that if spread offenses were so great, that at least one of the 32 NFL teams would be running one!
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66434 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:53 pm to
Any other option besides the RB helps their chancws of success.

LF7 gets keyed on because hey don't respect our QB and WR to be anywhere near the threat.
Posted by toughcrittercrumb
Houston
Member since Nov 2008
2142 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:55 pm to
A mobile QB definitely helps the running game. The threat of the QB picking up yards with his feet causes the linebackers to hold instead of immediately attacking downhill to tackle the rb.
New England runs a spread offense by the way.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
10444 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:57 pm to
The talent gap in the NFL isn't big enough to run a spread offense. You can only have so many play makers on a roster.

It's different on college. Just think of all the offensive weapons LSU has. A spread offense allows you to have more play makers on the field at a time.

Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53417 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:03 pm to
I think more often than not a QB running is a product of a pass play collapsing rather than actual designed running plays. If anything the receivers hurt from it.
Posted by victoire sécurisé
Member since Nov 2012
4825 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:05 pm to
Spread offenses in college are useful because it's a way to spread defenders out without having a QB who can routinely throw a 10 yard-out to the sideline on the opposite hash.

Every NFL QB can throw to the wide side of the field with accuracy, velocity and on-time in sync with their receiver. They have the talent and have put in the hours of practice with their WR's. Most college QB's don't have the talent, so D coordinators are free to align personnel elsewhere.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
10444 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:06 pm to
The recievers may hurt from it, but I can promise you that our 3rd down competion percentage wouldn't.
Posted by lolamontez
IntheheartofTX
Member since Sep 2016
299 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:06 pm to
Help
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44558 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Less. Teams need to respect that you'll hit them with the pass, otherwise they play downhill and load the box.



well, if the QB is someone like Hurts, then you do still have to respect the pass.
Posted by bababooey
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2009
1092 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:18 pm to
Yes.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22298 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:20 pm to
It's strictly a numbers game at the point of attack

LSU is always down 1 man at the point of attack b/c our QBs are not a viable option to run the ball.

When the defense has to respect the QB's ability to run, everything opens up.

LSU's QBs have been fragile and treated like they are wearing red jerseys. Harris is not a good runner. Etling is a poor runner. Go back and watch him at the goal line and pylon vs FL, awkward to say the least.

Last good rushing performance from our QB position was Jennings vs Texas A&M, and he wasn't even running a true read. He was designated to keep or handoff on every play. And the only reason I think we even allowed that was because it was last game of season and we had decided Harris would probably get the job the following season, so less concern of injury.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32628 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:24 pm to
A QB that is also a threat, arm or legs, will help our RBs.
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
2720 Arse Whipping Avenue
Member since Dec 2013
35930 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:27 pm to
The linebackers and defensive ends in the NFL are as fast as a lot of the running backs.

That's why it doesn't work in the NFL.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6078 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I think that if spread offenses were so great, that at least one of the 32 NFL teams would be running one!


IIRC
NFL receivers are not allowed to block until the QB throws the pass, college receivers can block at any time.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:52 pm to
Having an adequate pass attack will keep safeties from peaking in the backfield which will most definitely help the rbs ypc.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

IIRC
NFL receivers are not allowed to block until the QB throws the pass, college receivers can block at any time.



Well this isnt true. 5 yards brother. Dbs can chuck the wr within 5 yards. You think wr isnt allowed?

This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 2:56 pm
Posted by rsylve
Terrytown, LA
Member since Feb 2013
3775 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:19 pm to
What people fail to realize is a dual threat means that you can both run and pass. If a QB is labeled a dual threat but can't pass then he is not really a dual threat and the D will stack the line knowing you can't pass. A true dual threat improves all areas of the offense. A spy takes a defender out of pass defense. The pass rush becomes slowed as the DL is forced to play contain helping protection. The LBs freeze on run plays because they have to respect the QB keep. Everyone benefits from a true dual threat.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 3:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram