- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who is the best team in college baseball from 2000-2009?
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:34 am
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:34 am
The candidates
LSU 5 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2000 & 2009
Texas 6 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2002 & 2005
Oregon St 3 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2006 & 2007
Rice 5 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2003
Cal St 6 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2004
Miami 5 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2001
Fresno St 1 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2008
LSU 5 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2000 & 2009
Texas 6 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2002 & 2005
Oregon St 3 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2006 & 2007
Rice 5 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2003
Cal St 6 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2004
Miami 5 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2001
Fresno St 1 CWS Appearances 1 NC 2008
This post was edited on 6/26/09 at 12:05 pm
15
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:35 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Asking LSU board so going to say LSU wins this by a landslide
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:36 am to NorthshoreTiger76
do you mean decade or last ten years? This decade started in 2001. Just sayin'
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:37 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Looks to me that Texas has the edge by having one more CWS appearance than LSU does.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:37 am to NorthshoreTiger76
I would give it to Texas in a tie breaker given that they were runner up twice.
Yes LSU does have the two championships, but in the other 3 CWS appearances they were 1-6.
Yes LSU does have the two championships, but in the other 3 CWS appearances they were 1-6.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:37 am to tduecen
between LSU and Texas. I hate to say that smoke "bump on a log" lavale may have disadvantaged us.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:39 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Texas 6 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2002 & 2005
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:39 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Texas then us.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:41 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
This decade started in 2001. Just sayin'
ummm, not really. this decade goes from 2000-2009. that's like saying the 90's go from 1991-2000. doesn't make much sense now does it.
This post was edited on 6/26/09 at 11:42 am
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:43 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Texas is.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:43 am to lsufball19
quote:
ummm, not really. this decade goes from 2000-2009
No, he was right. Years start with 1, not 0 so the nineties technically go from 1991 to 2000, making LSU unquestionably the team of that decade. This decade from 2001 to 2010 belongs to Texas, imo.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:43 am to lsufball19
quote:
ummm, not really. this decade goes from 2000-2009
not really, if you start at 1 AD then the first decade was from 1 AD to 10 AD. Notice that there is no year zero. That means that every subsequent decade begins with a year that ends with 1 and ends with a year that ends with 0.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:45 am to MountainTiger
quote:
No, he was right. Years start with 1, not 0 so the nineties technically go from 1991 to 2000, making LSU unquestionably the team of that decade. This decade from 2001 to 2010 belongs to Texas, imo.
so then 1990 isn't part of the 90's. man glad you cleared that up for me
that has to be the dumbest thing i've ever heard. the year 2000 is not part of the 90's as much as you'd like it to be. the only reason why you say it is is because lsu won 5 titles in 10 years and you think it sounds better for some reason to say they won 5 in one decade.This post was edited on 6/26/09 at 11:47 am
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:45 am to ProjectP2294
It doesn't matter if you include 2000 or not. Texas won NCs twice and finished 2nd twice, while we went, what, 8 years without winning a single game in Omaha? Damn you Smoke!
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:45 am to lsufball19
quote:
ummm, not really. this decade goes from 2000-2009. that's like saying the 90's go from 1991-2000. doesn't make much sense now does it.
So, was the first year AD 0 or 1 - the first decade was year 1 - year 10...so 2001 - 2010???
This post was edited on 6/26/09 at 11:46 am
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:45 am to lsufball19
quote:
This decade started in 2001. Just sayin'
when you look at a stopwatch ready to start counting, does it say "1.00?"
If thats true then I actually run a 40 in 4.4 seconds.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:46 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Decade starts in 01. Our first CWS win this decade was only last year. Texas gets the nod.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:47 am to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
LSU 5 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2000 & 2009
Texas 6 CWS Appearances 2 NC 2002 & 2005
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:47 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
not really, if you start at 1 AD then the first decade was from 1 AD to 10 AD. Notice that there is no year zero. That means that every subsequent decade begins with a year that ends with 1 and ends with a year that ends with 0.
Thanks, you made the same point but said it better than I did.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 11:47 am to EmperorGout
quote:
It doesn't matter if you include 2000 or not. Texas won NCs twice and finished 2nd twice, while we went, what, 8 years without winning a single game in Omaha?
this.
clearly Texas, imo.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News