- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where does Paul Dietzel rank amongst LSU football coaches?
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:57 pm to Lonnie4LSU
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:57 pm to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
he was very good for LSU and LSU was very good for him.
This guy wasn't even making $40 grand back then. That was shitty.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 8:10 pm to DaSaltyTiger
I think you are spot on DaSaltyTiger with your assessment of the Dietzel and Jerry Stovall situation at the time.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 8:44 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Why did Paul Dietzel leave again? Did he retire? Or get an offer elsewhere?
He left for Army, when Army was still a prestige CFB program. Vietnam and the draft took care of that soon after he arrived
Yeah, Army and Navy were powerhouses at that point. My grandfather went up to West Point with Dietzel, got off the plan in 28 degree weather and said "screw this, I am going back to Baton Rouge". He coached with Mac for the next 20 years.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:05 pm to Tiger in NY
I’d like to make a couple of observations on both coaches after watching them from the stands for many years.
Dietzel: always punted on 3rd down.
Mac always platooned his quarterbacks, even when he had the best in college – Bert Jones.
Dietzel had some incredible talent but didn’t use them properly – see above.
Mac had an incredibly hard time beating the big boys: i.e. Alabama, primarily because he could not make in-game adjustments until half time. At that point he was usually playing catch up.
Would you hire either one of them today? One who gave up all 3rd down yardage and therefore many 1st downs and potential scores, and the other rotated his 1st and 2nd string quarterback every other possession regardless of opponent, game situation, or hot hand. Would you even interview them?
Both coaches are in the middle of the pack, with a huge space separating the top tier from the middle.
Dietzel: always punted on 3rd down.
Mac always platooned his quarterbacks, even when he had the best in college – Bert Jones.
Dietzel had some incredible talent but didn’t use them properly – see above.
Mac had an incredibly hard time beating the big boys: i.e. Alabama, primarily because he could not make in-game adjustments until half time. At that point he was usually playing catch up.
Would you hire either one of them today? One who gave up all 3rd down yardage and therefore many 1st downs and potential scores, and the other rotated his 1st and 2nd string quarterback every other possession regardless of opponent, game situation, or hot hand. Would you even interview them?
Both coaches are in the middle of the pack, with a huge space separating the top tier from the middle.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 8:15 am to DaSaltyTiger
quote:
What about 1969?
1973 was after 1969 - they won 9 straight games - losing the 10th game (to Bama, of course) was like Mac's Gettysburg. '74 we went 5-5-1 and the handwriting was on the wall.
I think the time between the Mississippi State game and the end of the Bama game in 1973 was the high water mark because LSU had just won its 45th game in 5 seasons and secure the 5th straight top 13 finish. This was the culmination of his best sustained period of success as LSU's head coach.
For those wanting to argue '69 because it was a MNC-caliber team (and Mac's best team as a head coach), I disagree.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 8:58 am to DaSaltyTiger
quote:
This guy wasn't even making $40 grand back then. That was shitty.
I don't know what Mac was making, but I hardly think it was "shitty" for the time and I don't think the man would have been here 25 yrs if he thought he was being treated "shitty".
Posted on 6/27/12 at 9:15 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
For those wanting to argue '69 because it was a MNC-caliber team (and Mac's best team as a head coach), I disagree.
The only reason they didn't play for the title that year was that Notre Dame lifted its self-imposed ban on participating in bowl games. LSU was holding out for the Cotton Bowl that year, which they anticipated would get them the NC if they won. However, at the last minute Notre Dame announced that they were going to resume participating in bowl games. The Cotton Bowl took them instead and the LSU team voted not to play in one of the "left over minor bowls".
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:40 am to Rudy40
quote:
I was not around for Dietzel and for Mac I remember his seasons from 73-79 very well and I think all will agree those werent his best years. I do think Mac was a great coach and a great man and should be beloved by all Tigers.
I think what may be left out and it was mentioned in the movie Ole War Skule was that many of the players felt Mac was such an incredible teacher of the game and the duties of the head coach limited the amount of time he could spend teaching players versus the amount of time he was able to spend as DC.
From my understanding Dietzel was very good administratively and was pretty good running an offense considering the era and typical offensive production of that era.
So I think LSU possibly would have been better off if Dietzel had stayed and ran the program and Mac had been the longtime DC. Whether Mac would have stayed a DC who knows but I think the Dietzel/Mac combo would have kept LSU nose to nose with Bama from the 60's until at least the early 70's.
Just my thoughts but I do believe Dietzel and Mac if remained together at LSU would have produced some more legendary teams and probably another NC or two.
One of the few voices of reason in this thread.
I really don't get all the dislike of Dietzel on here, like he was some kind of a Judas or something.
(A) He apparently didn't choose to leave on his own. Army in 1962 was nobody's "dream job."
(B) He clearly got it done his last 4 years, and was great at getting his team prepared to win the big game. In that time period, when Ole Miss clearly had the best football program in the nation, they were 0-3-1 against LSU. Even in 1960, Dietzel managed to give the Rebels' national championship team their only blemish.
(C) To this day, the only conference title won in the history of South Carolina football was won by Dietzel.
(D) He was apparently respected well enough to be named athletic director at South Carolina and Indiana, as well as president of the American Football Coaches Association and the national Fellowship of Christian Athletes.
(E) At the time Dietzel left, LSU was the 3rd most prestigious football program among SEC powers. He left it in good enough shape to be successful in the next few seasons from 1962-64 (just as he left Army in good enough shape to be successful in the next few seasons from 1966-68), but both programs went on a downward slide soon after. That's the sign of losing a great coach. (See Miami & Nebraska.)
(F) When everyone at LSU was apparently too chicken shite to fire Coach McClendon face-to-face, Dietzel came in and did the job that had to be done. I don't see why anyone should begrudge him for this. He faced the death of Bo Rein, and then did a good job in standing behind the short-term replacement in Jerry Stovall. As I recall, there were some NCAA infractions discovered in 1982 that had to do with Jerry Stovall and/or Dale Brown taking recruits to lunch at a local seafood restaurant, but it was not like the more serious sanctions imposed in 1998 due to Lester Earl.
Sentimentality aside, there can be little doubt that the LSU football program experienced an enormous blow by losing Dietzel. The program did not reach the sustained level it was at from 1958-1961 until the 2003-2007 years about 45 years later.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 12:07 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
The program did not reach the sustained level it was at from 1958-1961 until the 2003-2007 years about 45 years later.
To reiterate - Mac's defenses gave up less than 6 points per game over those 4 seasons.
I ultimately don't hate Dietzel. He was a pioneer - a revolutionary coach compared to most of his peers. He gave Ole Miss's greatest team fits every year. He did it primarily with coached-up Louisiana talent and, effectively 1 legendary player.
I just think that Mac gets dismissed because he didn't win a championship. Mac did more for LSU than Dietzel did. Mac deserves more loyalty than Dietzel does. I have them at 3A and 3B on my coaching list because Dietzel's accomplishments are tied strongly to Mac's performance as a defensive coach. While Mac was here a long time(the '69 through '73 run was all Mac), he did start off on the foundation that he and Dietzel built together.
They are almost too interwined to separate effectively.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 12:09 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
To reiterate - Mac's defenses gave up less than 6 points per game over those 4 seasons.
It was Dietzel's team.
quote:
Mac did more for LSU than Dietzel did.
That's absurd.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 12:18 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
It was Dietzel's team.
Yeah, and that was Ditka coaching the '85 Bears defense...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News