Started By
Message

re: Video of M. Dupre checking with line judge on that illegal formation penalty

Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:15 pm to
Posted by 7thWardTiger
Richmond, Texas
Member since Nov 2009
24670 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:15 pm to
The ref does signal the outside guy. However, both wide receivers will normally signal to the ref whether they are on or off, and the ref will sometimes tell them step back or step up.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

IT WASNT CALLED ON DUPRE YOU IDIOTS


Illegal formation is not a single player penalty boss
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53177 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:16 pm to
Well, usually it's one person that lines up incorrectly. LSU doesn't really get in any fancy formations, so its easy to tell who fricked up.
Posted by AnotherRound
Member since Oct 2012
2865 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:36 pm to
We need to get our shite together
Posted by studentsect
Member since Jan 2004
2259 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:37 pm to
In the video, Dupre was BEHIND Dural, and then checked with the ref to confirm that he was off the line, and was apparently told to back up, the implication being that his prior position, which was farther from the line than Dural, was too close to the line to be considered "off the line".

It makes no sense to tell Dupre to back up and then flag someone who was in front of Dupre's original spot.
This post was edited on 9/26/15 at 9:41 pm
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29266 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:45 pm to
dural should not be making these mistakes as a 4th year player
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56480 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

He was on the line of scrimmage and then stepped back



I don't think he was ever on the line of scrimmage.

He was confused...or Dural was clueless. One of those guys needed to be on the line.
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14420 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:13 pm to
Dupre was aware of the problem and I guess he thought both of them were on the line so he stepped back. However, neither were on the line so he should have stepped up to have the right formation. The worst part is, Dural had nothing to do with the play and Dupre to distract #23 enough, but I'm not sure that guy would have tackled Fournette anyway.
Posted by tygersgm
Member since Dec 2007
1945 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:13 pm to
Why is something like this still a penalty?!? I mean I could see if someone was running the wing t or something but the receivers don't have an imaginary chalk line that they can see! Every single play in every single game the receivers are checking with the refs because they obviously could be off my a shoe or two!! I'm watching the ucla blowout right now and every play could technically called bc this is so frickin subjective.

Football is becoming difficult to watch with all these penalties. Not just this one not just on LSU but in general. I can understand the nfl bc these are PROFESSIONALS - MASTERS OF THEIR CRAFT! This is ther damn job! We're talking here about 18 yo kids that are students FIRST and athletes SECOND! Where the ncaa limits their practices and in turn punishes them for not being error free.

Something needs to be done. Either review every penalty or have a general rule where if the penalty does not have any bearing on the play whatsoever, let the play stand and penalize the very next play.

Also need to have centralized referee committee for all games. I want a ref from the north south east and west in every game.

Ok I'm done(and drunk) just had to "rant" there for a minute. Just think it's been getting progressively worse and frickin worse

Carry on.....
Posted by BasilBogomil
Member since Dec 2012
6094 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26636 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Wasn't it called on Dural?


I saw somewhere that Miles said both asked the ref before they lined up.
Posted by tygersgm
Member since Dec 2007
1945 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:22 pm to
Link?
Posted by Sports2
w/friends like u, who needs friends
Member since Jul 2005
3724 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:35 pm to
LSU had six on the line of scrimmage, because Dural was a yard back and Dupre was 2 yards back of the line. That's the call, Les said that both guys checked with the ref, but ultimately it's up to them to be lined up correctly.

Still a bunch of crap considering line of scrimmage calls should be made for linemen or players looking to get an advantage blocking, none of which affected that play.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12896 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:00 pm to
I think the "5th back" is actually the TE on the other side (Jeter?)
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27828 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:13 pm to
TE was definitely on the line, obviously one of the WRs was supposed to be on.
Posted by km
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5653 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:26 pm to
The left tackle looked like he was in the backfield
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12896 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:28 pm to
It was the sideline ref on the opposite side of the camera that threw the flag. Granted, can not see the ref on this side with Dupre/Dural, but there's no reason for the ref on the other side to be throwing his flag unless it's on that side.

ETA: that would be the tackle, not a TE. but it looks to me like it's on that left side.
This post was edited on 9/26/15 at 11:30 pm
Posted by 7thWardTiger
Richmond, Texas
Member since Nov 2009
24670 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Why is something like this still a penalty?!


Because it would royally frick the defense if it wasn't.

Every player off the LOS is an eligible receiver and every player that is on the LOS but uncovered(think TE, slot receiver in flex formations) is eligible. having 5 men in the back field means there is an extra eligible receiver, meaning the defense doesn't know who is gonna go out on a passing route, meaning they won't know how to align themselves, or who has who in man coverage. Same reason why if a tackle checks in to a game as a tight end, the refs announce that he is an eligible receiver.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27828 posts
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:40 pm to
Just because he threw it doesn't mean it was on his side, that means nothing. And the end man on the line on that side was a TE, not a tackle. There is no need to over complicate this. It's obvious both receivers were off and one of them should have been on.
Posted by tigress4life
BR
Member since May 2007
956 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 12:07 am to
quote:

So you watch football and have never seen a slot guy be on the line? It happens all the time and he can still be eligible as long as another receiver outside of him isn't on the line



Ok I don't know why there is so much confusion, isn't the rule simply that there has to be at least 7 players on the line on offense. And as such there can only be 4 players off the line, at least one yard off the line of scrimmage, or in the backfield.

And with this formation, both receivers would have to be on the line?

This post was edited on 9/27/15 at 12:10 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram