Started By
Message

re: "Third party" eyewitnesses name now public..

Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:47 pm to
Posted by MightierThePenIs
Member since Jan 2008
1510 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:47 pm to
WHICH

if then get's matched up with trace evidence from Lowery's person

AND

trace evidence on Jefferson's shoes/clothing.




Well, you can start to see how an investigation builds...
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26126 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

"Right now we have conflicting statements from parties at the scene. We have conflicting statements that support one version over the version of the LSU players," White said. "What we don't have is a version of an objective third party that has absolutely no ties to either party involved in this incident, and we don't have conclusive video evidence that would support either claim."



so who all said I was using "third party" wrong and the police were right?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85138 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure that's what they're saying...


I don't get that from the report or the articles. Any attorney is going to try and destroy her credibility in court by saying she is biased, but there is no denying that she is a 3rd party.

Also, people were questioning how someone would know Johns in the fight when he is hardly known to avid LSU fans. Well, this Long girl is from Denham Springs and Johns went to Central, and they are around the same age, so it makes alot of sense that she would recognize JJ, for obvious reasons, and Johns.
Posted by tjohn deaux
GA
Member since Feb 2007
10179 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

but the kicker is



too soon?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85138 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

"What we don't have is a version of an objective third party that has absolutely no ties to either party


quote:

so who all said I was using "third party" wrong and the police were right?


Notice the use of "objective" in the statement? That is because it is obvious that Long is probably biased, but she is still a third party. How hard is this to understand?
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31033 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

She's not a 3rd party. If you look in the video she's the girl standing right over Lowery as he gets kicked. She's friends with him. This is nothing new.




This. She knows person A and person B.

She is not a 3rd party witness.
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89980 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

but there is no denying that she is a 3rd party.



yes there is.
Posted by mt1
LV
Member since Nov 2006
7198 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:51 pm to
What page are the FB link and pics on. Is she hot?
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Well, just me might have a better background in this.

Just sayin'
Just trying to help.

A lot of this stuff is greek to most people.

Some of it is latin.
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26126 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:52 pm to
i just got lambasted for saying "third party"

so i forgot to add objective, you think people would figure that out instead of picking apart every single thing.

wait, this is the rant
Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
36206 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

A lot of this stuff is greek to most people.

Some of it is latin.



Nicely done sir.
Posted by texastiger38
Member since Sep 2007
25237 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:56 pm to
yes she is
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31033 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:56 pm to
I have no idea.
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26126 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:57 pm to
She knows johns because she is around the same age as his and she is from DS and he is from central?


Really?
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48330 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:57 pm to
Long is a biased 3rd party.

As far as I've seen, there have been no reported accounts from an unbiased or neutral 3rd party.
Posted by White Shadeaux
In the nicest parts of hell
Member since Jan 2006
24114 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:59 pm to
When are we going to get videos and statements from the employees at Shady's?

Wouldn't these be the most unbiased accounts? (at least from inside the place)
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22046 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

When are we going to get videos and statements from the employees at Shady's?
I have a theory about this...but I will keep to myself for now...
Posted by White Shadeaux
In the nicest parts of hell
Member since Jan 2006
24114 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

I have a theory about this...but I will keep to myself for now...


Tease.
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Chicken


PM me your theory, I have one too....oh that's right, no PMs...
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
85045 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

I have a theory about this...but I will keep to myself for now...

Me too, but I'll share mine.

Because Shady's may become a party to the civil suit, their liability carrier has instructed them to not allow any of their employees to give independent statements, except to Police.

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram