re: There is a generational divide when it comes to LSU football.

I'm old enough not to require a LSU FB history lesson, and recall losing 30-35% in of games a few seasons wasn't worthy of termination.
In fact I'll say sometime this century the fanbase got a bit full of themselves and admin a bit too receptive to their tantrum.
Just because you "demand excellence" doesn't mean you'll get it, if not attempted to acquire it in a logical method.
Read that as not kneejerk firings with huge buyouts and no viable replacement for the coach who pretty much owns your record books, career W%, won NC, played for another, etc, etc.

I've been around "since Hitler was a road guard" , and if you think this is bad, you should have been around years ago. Taking another coaches players, and molding them to fit your strategy takes awhile. We are simply outmanned on bot lines , and will be the rest of this year . Whatever Frank Herron if being punished for is a real hit to the DL.O continues to brush it off when his name comes up. It's a good thing we don't have another SEC game this week. It will present a little longer to prepare for the real games.

I have to disagree, LSU as a football program is all time top 10-12. That is not an also ran. I'm pretty sure, that unitl 1990 LSU only had back to back losing seasons twice. Now I am not saying that the younger fans aren't spoiled, but to say this program was an also ran, I disagree.

If we still had les we wouldn't have been run over last week ,when you run off coaches and bring in new coaches there is player attrition in this case , we have lost six transfers off the offensive line ,most of them would have playing time this year ! WE have coaches and now we have to let them right the ship .New talk of new coaches just give us more troubles ! The negatigers have punished me a enough , I don't want to hear from them !

Cholly Mac wasn't making 4 Million a year to go 8-4. The cost to attend games was next to nothing, and you didn't have to sit in hours of traffic.

The fact thats LSU was mediocre before Saban, doesn't mean we should accept mediocrity now. Saban proved what LSU could and should be.

We accepted the the costs of that because the AD was run well under Bertman, good hires were made, and there was ample success. I for one am less accepting of the cost now, because the results have diminished.

quote:

---

BS. I sat through Cholly and Curley and have no patience with this shite when it is obviously going to decline further before it gets better.

The administration is to blame for not transitioning away from Les faster and then for the process that brought us Ed O.

I have been through the bad times before and never want to go back, which is exactly where we are heading. The evidence is right in front of you.

---

You read my mind. I wish I could upvote this 100 times.

I go back a long way, and have seen some bad games and bad years. Saturday night was among the worst I've ever seen LSU play. Even in years with less talent, we were coached better and had the desire to play hard. Saturday we were embarrassing.

We are at least 3 years on a downward slide, perhaps this is the bottom, but we are at least 3 years away from relevancy. I was willing to give orgeron a chance, and now I see how bad he is. I waited 48 years for a second national championship and by damn if I am willing to quietly wait for the next when I see the amateur management of this effort. All Eva was a terrible hire, ask Duke if they miss him. Orgeron is a mistake and we are in the cfb wasteland due to penny pinching lightweights.

All this pissin and moaning from a bunch of snowflakes. Grow up. Defeats are a part of life.

That might the best trait the newbiees have ..........

Chollly Mac had the same problem that Les and the current coach have.

The best in the business as a division rival. He was far from mediocre.