- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teabagger in court today
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:03 pm to Thunder Tiger
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:03 pm to Thunder Tiger
quote:
instrument of assault
the meat flute
0
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:03 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
Giantkiller
The fact that you consider this normal (normal prank, normal behavior, etc.) is disturbing. Please stay away from my family.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:04 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
The law is what it is and who knows what the victim thinks at this point. If it was me, I'd be hopping mad and want the guy prosecuted in a pretty strong fashion. This was too far to be called a "prank". Anyone calling it that is suspect. You might be capable of the same stupidity.
You legitimately think he sexually assaulted the guy? I mean, you really and honestly think this was sexually deviant in nature?
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:06 pm to TexasTiger89
Well lets just give him a week or two in jail with that rap...After that he should be cured of his ill ways 
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:07 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
You legitimately think he sexually assaulted the guy? I mean, you really and honestly think this was sexually deviant in nature?
speculation.
based on the facts; ie, junk on face. yes, sexual assult
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:10 pm to Giantkiller
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/23/21 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:11 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
It wasn't a sexual
that's the bottom line. yeah, i know how the statute defines the crime. but honestly, do you think this guy was getting sexual gratification? he was doing the grossest thing he could think of in his drunk fog. Get the frick over it.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:13 pm to Giantkiller
If I recall correctly, he hasn't been charged with anything yet. That's what the hearing was about. He was "booked" on sexual battery and if you read the statute, the shoe fits. If he's charged with that, I'm fine with it. Sometimes, in life, you don't get a bye for stupid pet tricks. The thing to do is, especially when you're an adult as this guy was in age, only, is not to commit such acts. In today's world, you might just get yourself into some bad trouble.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:14 pm to piratedude
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/23/21 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:15 pm to junkfunky
quote:
The fact that you consider this normal (normal prank, normal behavior, etc.) is disturbing. Please stay away from my family.
I don't think it's normal behavior. It's gross. I would never condone or encourage something as vile. It's seriously messed up. But I would probably put it more in the same category as mooning or flashing titties at mardi gras than as a rape or public masturbation. If I get something in the mail about sexual predators moving into my neighborhood, I'd expect them to be real sexual predators. I just don't put this guy into the same category.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:16 pm to Summer of George
quote:
You legitimately think he sexually assaulted the guy? I mean, you really and honestly think this was sexually deviant in nature?
Doesn't matter what you or I think giant, it is a matter of what the law states as sexual in nature. Due to the fact that the bagger whipped his meat pistol out in public & bagged the victim, yes this is a sexual assault. If the GUMP would have stuck to rubbing his middle finger in the drunks face no harm in this act. But the bagger decided he wanted to be a Alabama hero. You play, you pay = sexual offender. Your argument doesn't standup in a court of law, sorry!!!
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:22 pm to Cwar11
quote:
Doesn't matter what you or I think giant, it is a matter of what the law states as sexual in nature. Due to the fact that the bagger whipped his meat pistol out in public & bagged the victim, yes this is a sexual assault. If the GUMP would have stuck to rubbing his middle finger in the drunks face no harm in this act. But the bagger decided he wanted to be a Alabama hero. You play, you pay = sexual offender. Your argument doesn't standup in a court of law, sorry!!!
well said!
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:29 pm to Thunder Tiger
quote:
The crime as quoted does not require sexual gratification of any sort. You get the frick over it.
Read my post. I am well aware of the language used in lrs 14:43.1(a) and that the title for the section is "sexual battery." I think everybody but stevie wonder and ray charles know that the facts show that teabagging violated the code article.
but we should expect more out of our government than blind following of rules. we want them to think, evaluate, and make rational decisions based on all of the facts and circumstances. In this case, I believe it would a ridiculous outcome for this a-hole to be branded as a sexual offender. he's just an a-hole.
and now, i believe sir that it is your turn to get the frick over it. and i mean that in the nicest way possible.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:35 pm to Cwar11
quote:
If the GUMP would have stuck to rubbing his middle finger in the drunks face...
quote:
But the bagger decided he wanted to be a Alabama hero...
Obvious P&G glasses is obvious.
Hopefully the legal system can differentiate between a realistic sexual predator, and/or a way to get back at the Bammers.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:37 pm to Giantkiller
You'll probably get your wish. The fact that the DA hasn't decided on the charge indicates, to me, a real possibility that he's going to bail on the sexual battery charge and is trying to think up something else which saves face for him and doesn't send this idiot too far downstream. It may well be that the victim doesn't want this going that far. The DA can certainly consider that even though he doesn't need the guy.
If this happened to me, it wouldn't hurt my feelings if he was branded. I'd feel violated, but I can't speak for the victim here.
If this happened to me, it wouldn't hurt my feelings if he was branded. I'd feel violated, but I can't speak for the victim here.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:38 pm to piratedude
Everyone knows it was sexual assault. No question
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:42 pm to JTA1985
quote:
it was sexual assault
assault is an attempt
battery is accomplishing it
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:43 pm to JTA1985
Im kind of with you Gris Gris..When the DA pushed this back its almost like they want to keep it on the down low till everybody forgets about it.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:45 pm to JTA1985
quote:
Everyone knows it was sexual assault. No question
I don't know why I even try on here sometimes.
Ranters gonna rant, right?
/thread.
Posted on 3/20/12 at 5:00 pm to Giantkiller
[quote]I don't know why I even try on here sometimes.
Then please call it a day.
Then please call it a day.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News