Started By
Message

re: Stealing... How effective?

Posted on 3/8/16 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12118 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

If a guy reaches 2B 44 times and only scores 3 of those times you've got bigger problems than the 4 outs it cost you. And if 43 successful steals only bet you 3 runs then it's safe to say that those 4 outs didn't cost you any runs.


You're missing my point. I'm not saying that the runner doesn't score, I'm asking how often does he score only because he stole the base and where he wouldn't have scored had he not stolen the base?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85069 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 8:03 pm to
So how many times does he score on a hit when at 2B or on a sac fly or grounder to the middle after stealing 3B?

A lot.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 8:03 pm to
Okay.

How many times does he not get out on a double play? I have to assume that there are more ground balls to the Infield instead of a double that would have scored him from first.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

You're missing my point. I'm not saying that the runner doesn't score, I'm asking how often does he score only because he stole the base and where he wouldn't have scored had he not stolen the base?


Well...seeing as one takes you out of a force out...I would imagine a lot more.

But to answer the entire question...I'm sure there are stats on this but I'd say around 50-75% more.
Posted by SL Tiger
Houston
Member since May 2007
2224 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 9:03 pm to
Stealing puts pressure on the fielding team. What does a pitcher do when a runner is on first? Have you ever seen a pitcher miss the throw to 1st? Where does 1B play when a runner is on 1st? If you get your leadoff hitter on base, and he happens to be one of your better baserunners, you steal 2nd and can score without a base hit. The fielding team may also shift alignments to be in position to make a play at home. When a team shifts players, they are conceding some part of the field.

When you think about it, SB's is usually one of the offensive stats with a positive success rate or above 50%. Freeman and Fraley steal bases with ~75% success rate. This is why a team with great pitching and a solid defense will typically be in a position to win games. They can generate enough offense to win those close games.

Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
77570 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 10:21 pm to
Its hard to get an exact value, but this article below references 70% success rate for it to be effective, and that number seems similar to one i've heard before. Now, this is based on historical MLB data. I doubt this data exists for the college game. But with more offense and more wild pitches, walks, lack of good defense,etc. I'd imagine you need to be closer to 75 or 80% for it to be worth it.


LINK

This link shows 70-75%
LINK
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 10:25 pm
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12118 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 11:35 pm to
quote:


LINK

This link shows 70-75%
LINK


This pretty much is what I was looking for. Thanks.
Posted by LSUDonMCO
Orlando
Member since Dec 2003
6877 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Stealing... How effective?



Depends on what you're stealing. Stay away from banks (they almost always catch you). I recommend credit card fraud or politics.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Effectiveness depends on the player stealing.


This and who the catcher is and less so who the pitcher is.

If you have a great base stealer on first, a slow windup pitcher, and a catcher with a weak arm...you should almost always steal.

If any of those aren't true, especially the catcher/base runner portions, you shouldn't steal IMO.

Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22422 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:39 am to
Well, let's flip this around. Say you don't steal and now you have to bunt everybody over. Wouldn't that be way more outs with no runs scored unless someone produces a base hit just like when someone steals. The point of stealing is trying to avoid giving up the easy out and pressure the defense to make a mistake. Although sometimes the bunt is successful, it is an out more times than not.Sometimes you win sometimes you lose
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 8:29 am
Posted by LMfan
Member since Aug 2014
5145 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Saber metrics say don't steal


Not true in the least.

As someone has already linked though, research shows the success rate must be 70-75% to justify the risk.
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 8:17 am
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
66188 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 8:25 am to
it's only effective if you don't get caught
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81699 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 8:26 am to
quote:

It moves you 90 feet closer to scoring, which is never not a good thing.
A successful one sure does.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25176 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Saber metrics say don't steal




In fairness, the data was run on major league games, which is a horse of a different color. The catchers are better, the pitchers are better. Running on college catchers is a different matter all together.
Posted by OGtigerfan73
Member since Feb 2015
709 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:35 am to
Yeah mlb studies on this subject could not be less relevant when comparing to college baseball.
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
33524 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Stealing... How effective?


LSU is 24/33 for 72.7%.

So I would say for LSU, 72.7% of the time, it works every time.
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9591 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:47 am to
quote:

squash the bug type of baseball guy also


and whats wrong with squashing the bug?.. are you a lift and run guy?
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
7349 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

and whats wrong with squashing the bug?


Doesn't transfer weight forward. Makes the batter all rotational. Pretty serious matter nowadays.
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9591 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Doesn't transfer weight forward. Makes the batter all rotational. Pretty serious matter nowadays.


when you turn the foot first after the lite landing stride you transfer weight into the stiff front leg... try it... when you transfer weight forward (or run at it you are the easiest hitter in the world to throw to..
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
21153 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:58 am to
Stealing bases, with the right players, in the right situation, does a world of good.

There is so many advantages to trying to take a base. It moves you 90 ft. closer, which allows a run to score off of a base hit. It takes away the double play ball. It puts pressure on the pitcher/catcher if they know there is a threat to steal. It forces the pitcher to change pitches he can throw, if there is a runner who may take a bag. It gives you the option of hit-and-run, which will open up holes in the infield, giving you a higher chance to get an infield base hit.

All of that out weighs the opportunity of getting an out. If you are taking extra bases at a high percentage, then by all means, take the chance.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram