- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So, let's have a frank discussion about Tiger Vision video quality...
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:01 am to Chicken
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:01 am to Chicken
0
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:04 am to Chicken
quote:
I was hoping someone here would know what it would cost to upgrade.
THEY know the cost. They SHOULD also know how many are fed up with the product, so let's start the roll call/petition.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:04 am to Restomod
Why so many different pricing for this game. I payed $39.95 with Directv. Was the $25 for outside of Louisiana? 2 friends in the Thibodaux area caught the game for free with Charter. I am sure there was a glitch.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:04 am to Chicken
I paid almost $40 for the game on Att Uverse and the quality was the worst I've ever seen on cable TV. Looked like old antenna days picking up an out of town station. No excuse for this crap. I'll never buy it again. it's one level of abuse to rape fans and charge them $40 for a game others are watching free on the internet, but to then deliver the garbage they did is just sleezy.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:05 am to Chicken
quote:
Since I am numb to all the naming rights stuff going on around the stadium, I wouldn't care if they called it Scotty Moran's Tiger Vision as long as it greatly improved...
Second this. FWIW I stood up and cheered for him Saturday night.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:07 am to Ole War Skule
Yea, I paid $40 with Cox PPV for that crap. The feed kept going in and out.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:08 am to Nissanmaxima
quote:it was strange...channel 787 had the game for $39.95, but channel 788 also had it for only $25. Naturally, I went with channel 788.
I payed $39.95 with Directv
787 was PPV and 788 was ESPN Gameplan...don't know the difference except the price.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:09 am to TomTigerBTR
We got NO broadcast in parts of Shreveport until mid second quarter.
Comcast said they had "problems" getting the broadcast.
For this I paid $39.50.
ANY picture was better than none.
The athletic dep't needs to get this stright. It is bush league, for such a successful program...
Comcast said they had "problems" getting the broadcast.
For this I paid $39.50.
ANY picture was better than none.
The athletic dep't needs to get this stright. It is bush league, for such a successful program...
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:11 am to nitwit
That's it...time to organize the "March for Migraines....caused by Tigervision"
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:12 am to Tiger4Ever
I find the picture quality on all the ESPN Gameplan games to suck.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:13 am to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
The picture looked good back in 1986
It looked like a feed straight out of 1986
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:13 am to Tiger4Ever
I don't understand why the Alex Box video looks so much better...why do they have HD cameras for baseball but not football?
I complained about this before the game even started (well it was more asking if they will have finally upgraded)
Once the game started...
It's embarrassing
I complained about this before the game even started (well it was more asking if they will have finally upgraded)
Once the game started...
It's embarrassing
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:15 am to coolpapaboze
I paid $39.99 on Dish Network. The feed was horrible too. If University of Texas can have their own network, why can't we?
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:15 am to Good Times
quote:WTF? I paid $40 plus $5 since the asian chick couldn't get it to go through my phone line.
I have Directtv, paid $25,
She said that was the only channel DirecTV offered the game on....
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:16 am to Eighteen
quote:
I don't understand why the Alex Box video looks so much better...why do they have HD cameras for baseball but not football?
Aren't those the CST cameras? I don't know much if anything about equipment at one venue versus the other but I agree. Cox or someone like Chicken mentioned should step up with donation and have their name plastered across the bottom of the screen the whole game. I'm for it!
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:16 am to liquid rabbit
quote:
I think they spent all the money installing that pipe.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:17 am to Papa Tigah
Agreed. I get the Tigervision games on ESPN Gameplan and there was nothing wrong with the video quality.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:21 am to Chicken
It wasn't the cable provider, it was the equipment. I have Eatel, which runs off a singlemode fiber strand to the house. That is 20 times better than a coaxial cable signal, and it was the same.
If they are using shitty cameras, it doesn't matter what the cable company does with the camera feed and how they distribute the signal to the house. Shitty pixels and frames per second is going to give you a picture back in that way. This isn't CSI where Cox or Eatel can zoom in and "clean up" the picture.
By the way, I know you know this Chicken. I'm saying "you" in general.
If they are using shitty cameras, it doesn't matter what the cable company does with the camera feed and how they distribute the signal to the house. Shitty pixels and frames per second is going to give you a picture back in that way. This isn't CSI where Cox or Eatel can zoom in and "clean up" the picture.
By the way, I know you know this Chicken. I'm saying "you" in general.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:21 am to manwich
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:30 am to TXGunslinger10
Now I feel stupid I paid the 39.95 when I coulda paid 25
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News