- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scheduling is old news but Chris Low nailed it
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:03 pm to TigerStripes06
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:03 pm to TigerStripes06
quote:
In 2 or 3 years when lsu hasn't played Georgia or USCe in 2 years, I guarantee you the Alabama fans won't be complaining.
They wouldn't have anything to complain about anyway.
You only have to go back to 2010 to see everyone involved with Alabama complaining about schedules being unfair.
0
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:36 pm to TigerStripes06
quote:
I can't believe people are still griping about schedules.
When the SEC takes a 12-2 Georgia team off the Alabama SEC schedule, replaces them with a 2-10 Kentucky team, and then adds that same 12-2 Georgia team to the LSU SEC schedule, I am going to gripe whether you like it or not.
You can bend over at take it if you want without griping, but when I get something crammed up my arse I'm going to yell.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:34 pm to Paul Allen
quote:They weren't as good as Florida. Did you even bother reading the whole thread before responding?
The Vols were pretty good
This post was edited on 7/21/13 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:37 pm to 3xlsugrad
quote:If you seriously would have rather faced the Steve Spurrier Florida Gators over the "Fat Phil" led Tennessee Vols back in the 90s then you are a fool.
Who wants to see Fat Phil every year?
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:43 pm to Laman1978
I would always prefer to face the better team.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:53 pm to Mulerider
Miles did a great job of getting the media excited about the topic. I'm glad he did.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:54 pm to 3xlsugrad
quote:Well aren't you the noble one. Thank God you're not our AD.
I would always prefer to face the better team.
So you're telling me that you wouldn't prefer another break or 2 in the schedule in order to increase our odds of making it to Atlanta? I think you're just full of **** and too proud to admit you're wrong. Even the best teams in the history of college football would struggle with some of our recent schedules.
This post was edited on 7/21/13 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 7/21/13 at 7:09 pm to Laman1978
Not proud at all. I have always preferred to play a tougher schedule than play a lighter one and win a meaningless conference championship.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 7:11 pm to Mulerider
LSU plays Florida every year. Auburn plays Georgia every year. Alabama plays Tennessee every year. That's all there is to it.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 7:43 pm to 3xlsugrad
So the SEC Championship game is meaningless?
Posted on 7/21/13 at 7:45 pm to Laman1978
Conference championships are meaningless. The national championship is the only one that matters.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 7:48 pm to 3xlsugrad
So the fact that the last 7 winners of the SEC Championship have gone to the National Championship means nothing?
Posted on 7/21/13 at 7:51 pm to 3xlsugrad
You know what, just don't even bother responding. You're obviously just stubborn and trying to be a pain in the arse.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 8:08 pm to Laman1978
I see the value of a conference championship equal to the value of a state. Both should be abolished.
Posted on 7/21/13 at 11:06 pm to 3xlsugrad
quote:
Conference championships are meaningless
Tell that to coaches who get a bonus in their pay when they win one or schools that hang banners in their stadiums when their teams win one or players who get to wear rings denoting the accomplishment.
Posted on 7/22/13 at 1:05 am to 3xlsugrad
Ok so how do you expect your team to win a national championship if it gets stuck with a much much much harder schedule than its rival every year?
It's ok to always want the toughest opponent if you don't care about winning a title and just view each game as entertainment but I'd like to see LSU win a NC.
It's ok to always want the toughest opponent if you don't care about winning a title and just view each game as entertainment but I'd like to see LSU win a NC.
This post was edited on 7/22/13 at 1:06 am
Posted on 7/22/13 at 1:04 pm to JJ27
quote:
I wish they would just move Auburn and Bama to the East, and move Missouri and Vandy to the West, then drop the permanent cross divisional games altogether. THERE. DONE DEAL.
Yeah that seems balanced. LSU and A&M vs Bama, Florida, UGA, SC, Auburn
Who cares about balance? Tradition is all that matters. That's why Bama gets a joke of a schedule while we face a nightmarish one. Fairness and balance mean nothing. Unless it's Bama who is at the disadvantage, then it's suddenly important.
Posted on 7/22/13 at 1:06 pm to texastigerr
quote:
In the East South Carolina has a schedule that does not include Alabama, LSU or TAM.
But at least there's some justice in that because they have been fricked over the last two years.
Posted on 7/22/13 at 1:10 pm to Mulerider
Eliminate permanent cross-divisional games and make teams that have rivalries use an OOC slot to play that game.
I don't really like that option, but its an option.
I don't really like that option, but its an option.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News