Started By
Message

re: Reasons why LSU is better than USC

Posted on 8/24/12 at 2:52 am to
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 2:52 am to
they just are!

Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 3:38 am to
quote:

Because this isn't the Trojan Rant.


This. And only this.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 5:47 am to
From a football perspective, overall depth (sanctions) and DL. The specifics:

OL: USC
QB: USC
TE: USC
RB: LSU (you have 5 good uns, we have 2 and a push)
WR: USC (no offense, but we're the dog's bollocks)

P: LSU (G'Day ladies)
K: USC

DL: LSU (might be the best in CF, SC is a huge ?)
LB: USC (pass D) LSU (rush D) tie
CB: USC
S: LSU (if Reid's back) if not then USC (TJ MAC)

I'll submit that you have a much better tailgate and CF message board, but SC has you in the all-time greatness and history category.

Beautiful women: SC girls are OT 8's and that's an understatement. I live in the South though, and the ladies of LA are beautiful and very sweet.

Fight On!
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 5:50 am
Posted by FightOn4ever
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2012
1503 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:01 am to
quote:

OL: USC
QB: USC
TE: USC
RB: LSU (you have 5 good uns, we have 2 and a push)
WR: USC (no offense, but we're the dog's bollocks)

P: LSU (G'Day ladies)
K: USC

DL: LSU (might be the best in CF, SC is a huge ?)
LB: USC (pass D) LSU (rush D) tie
CB: USC
S: LSU (if Reid's back) if not then USC (TJ MAC)

I'll submit that you have a much better tailgate and CF message board, but SC has you in the all-time greatness and history category.

Beautiful women: SC girls are OT 8's and that's an understatement. I live in the South though, and the ladies of LA are beautiful and very sweet.

Fight On!


Spot on
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22422 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:19 am to


quote:

Spot on








Posted by FightOn4ever
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2012
1503 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:23 am to
you should have posted that right after the OP, where i is more applicable.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56011 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:41 am to
If we loose it will probably be to a pretty good team

if USC looses it will probably be to some middle of the road team they overlooked.
Posted by tigeramongpigs
Fort Smith, Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
2136 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:42 am to
just cause, like I tell my kids....
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47737 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:51 am to
You have lots of boyfriends. Gay ones. If you think SC's oline is better than lsu's you are high.
This post was edited on 8/24/12 at 6:53 am
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 6:55 am to
quote:

You have lots of boyfriends. Gay ones. If you think SC's oline is better than lsu's you are high.
You are obviously very insecure. And USC's O-line is better than LSU's any day.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47737 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 7:29 am to
quote:

And USC's O-line is better than LSU's any day.


Delusion at it's finest. LSU is tanlented, experienced, and deep. USC has two advantages over LSU QB and wideout, that's it.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47737 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 7:49 am to
LINK

According to some USC's o-line isn't even in the same ballpark as LSU's.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 7:58 am to
we have a better offensive line. our qb is bigger and better. we have better RBs. USC probably has better recievers. We have better special teams and its not even close
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 8:27 am to
quote:

we have a better offensive line. our qb is bigger and better. we have better RBs. USC probably has better recievers. We have better special teams and its not even close
Posted by Bobby Moore
Red Hill, Mississippi
Member since Jun 2005
17751 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 9:06 am to
LSU has better billboards......
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 9:23 am to
quote:

LSU has better billboards......

Touche.
Posted by Lonnie4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
9525 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 9:26 am to
quote:

history category.


Recent history since 2000 has LSU ranked at #2 in wins among BCS programs and with 2 BCSNCs.

So. Cal doesn't even rank in the Top 10 in wins since 2000 and has zero BCSNCs.

Wanta guess how many BCSNCs the PAC 10 has won and by how many different conference schools in comparison to the SEC since 2000?

All time greatness is really cool and I'll pat you on the back, but in the famous words of somebody, "what in the hell has So. Cal. or the Pac 10 done lately in the world of big time college football beside get caught doing some big time cheating"?

That list you posted is all assumption and that's fine, we on a sports forum. What I posted is fact and as "fighton4ever" says in his image..."deal with it".



Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 9:32 am to
quote:

All time greatness is really cool and I'll pat you on the back, but in the famous words of somebody, "what in the hell has So. Cal. or the Pac 10 done lately in the world of big time college football beside get caught doing some big time cheating"?
We've got the best winning percentage against the SEC since 2000, bar none.

National Champions (AP) 2003, 2004.
BCS Champions (administratively redacted) 2004

Post season ban for two years will put a damper on your victory total, but even sanctioned and under scholarship limitations you will not see USC with a losing season. Instead we'll be competing for conference championships and national championships year in, year out.



Posted by bojabu
Member since Sep 2010
1275 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 9:48 am to
quote:

OL: USC
QB: USC
TE: USC
RB: LSU (you have 5 good uns, we have 2 and a push)
WR: USC (no offense, but we're the dog's bollocks)
P: LSU (G'Day ladies)
K: USC
DL: LSU (might be the best in CF, SC is a huge ?) LB: USC (pass D) LSU (rush D) tie
CB: USC
S: LSU (if Reid's back) if not then USC (TJ MAC)


Wrong.

OL: Massively LSU, not remotely close
QB: USC, based only on experience and conference played in
TE: USC, by a lot
RB: LSU
WR: USC, by a cockhair. LSU has two WRs that are going to shock everyone except those on Tiger Rant. USC's are overrated just like pretty much every other position.

DL: LSU has the nation's best, USC isn't going to be in the top 25.
LB: Both unknown. USC is unproven, as is LSU
CB: Dude, Lsu. Especially when TM7 gets back.
S: Lsu IF Loston is healthy, by a lot. If not, even.

Special Teams: LSU in every facet. Kicking, punting, returns, and return stopping.

Coaching: Mad Hatter vs. Ultimate Douche ..... going to go with the guy who has won like 76% or something ridiculous of his conference games.
Posted by How I Roll
Paradise City
Member since Dec 2011
1785 posts
Posted on 8/24/12 at 9:50 am to
Our uniforms look cooler
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram