Started By
Message

re: Rate Stud's Play Calling

Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:03 am to
Posted by LATIGERFAN
Member since Sep 2009
1309 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:03 am to
Stud followed the game plan and it's what most thought it would be. Oregon lost a lot of it's front seven and we all thought LSU's offensive line could dominate. You have to run the football over and over in the first half to dominate in the second half the way they did. Give him a "A".
This post was edited on 9/4/11 at 9:04 am
Posted by Michael J
Member since Jan 2011
1673 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:03 am to
B+ You could clearly see that the coaches knew that Oregon couldn't hang going toe to toe with the Tigers for the entire game. LSU is way too physical for the ducks. I especially loved the play action bomb to Beckham that was called back on a bullshite flag. I look forward to seeing more of agressive calls like that.

Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
33866 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:05 am to
He gets massive points from me for not running the option.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Not really but they could have ran four wide and and a delay or dive with Ford to spread them out. They could have ran some misdirection cut back. Instead, it was the same toss or dive everytime. I don't even think they ran any off tackle except when Ford bounced it outside.


So what you are saying is that they could have run plays other than those that worked? Ok
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Stud followed the game plan and it's what most thought it would be. Oregon lost a lot of it's front seven and we all thought LSU's offensive line could dominate. You have to run the football over and over in the first half to dominate in the second half the way they did. Give him a "A".


Finally someone that understands.
Posted by Dinkle
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2006
1180 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:16 am to
More than the play-calling itself was the change of pace no huddle attack in the 3rd quarter that I think changed the game for LSU. It took Oregon by surprise and kept them on the their heels. A little dose of their own medicine, so to speak.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51354 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:24 am to
quote:


re: Rate Stud's Play Calling (Posted on 9/4/11 at 8:54 a.m. to CajunRevolution)

quote:
Look, I'm glad we won but the play calling wasn't all world buddy



Let me guess. You want lots and lots of downfield passes? You want triple reverse lateral passes? You want playground stuff?

The coaching staff totally figured out the Oregon defense and used the weapons and talents on hand to dominate them. Smart planning and play calling isn't a matter of elaborate trick plays. It is using the assets you have to your best advantage. The play calling reflected that. I am truly sorry that LSU disappointed you. I'm sorry that you want LSU to be TCU, but it won't happen under Miles. So be prepared for lots of disappointments


exactly. They looked at the Auburn game, realized we had a nice size advantage, and went to work on wearing them down and pushing them around. You have a new qb who needs to develop his timing with the 1's, so they didn't put it all on him at first, let the game develop and come to him, then started giving him passing plays that were more aggressive as the game continued. There was nothing cute about the playcalling, no overthinking, no genius crap. Took their advantages and made use of them while protecting the weaknesses.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33658 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:26 am to
who knows what the gameplan was going in?

granted, the play calling was boring, vanilla, & we just ran between the tackles all night (it worked), but Lee didnt exactly play well enough to open up the book

he spent the first half throwing behind the receivers, doesnt exactly inspire confidence in a 2nd half passing attack
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:27 am to
Bland and vanilla... hardly sexy. Old school smash mouth football dominating the line of scrimmage. Would have seen us go down field a couple of more times... but solid B for me.



Posted by Newgene
Waveland, MS
Member since Nov 2005
7235 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:32 am to
A

I think it was tailored for the players on the field. It was conservative at QB to get JL some confidence, while it took advantage of our ability to pound the ball right at them. He threw in play action and screens periodically to keep them honest, and we threw it up the field, too.

If we don't drop 4 long passes, and if we don't get a BS hold on the play to OBJ, we wouldn't have this conversation.

I thought the offense was solid. It was such a relief to see the us trying to establish the passing game, and putting up 40 points in a game.
Posted by crownNbull
Gretna
Member since Jun 2010
3078 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:34 am to
The field position did help but last year turnovers were resulting in FG's, last night those turnovers were TD's, thats a big improvement.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9191 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:37 am to

Run - Power right, Power left, Toss Right, Toss Left, QB sneak.

Pass - Swing pass to RB, TE over the middle, TE seam route, Fade Route, Sideline Deep Ball.

That was pretty much the offense from what I remember.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60255 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:38 am to
Les called a great game last night.
Posted by GiveMeTheBigOne
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
311 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:51 am to
A

The offense did exactly what it needed to do last night. They won T.O.P. against Oregon. How often did this happen last year? Unlike last year, the OFFENSE helped out the defense by eliminating 3 and outs EVERY drive. I'll take this kind of win 14 times this year, if necessary. We are a defensive minded team with an unbelievable 2 deep. Let's let our defense win as many games for us this year as we can.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10311 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Stud followed the game plan and it's what most thought it would be. Oregon lost a lot of it's front seven and we all thought LSU's offensive line could dominate. You have to run the football over and over in the first half to dominate in the second half the way they did. Give him a "A".



THIS.....and there was no need to reveal too much of the passing game or trick plays to allow future opponents to prepare for. Winning games in the games in the 4th quarter is often predicated by how you set up your opponent in the first 3 quarters. Winning BIG games in November is often about how you set that opponent up by not giving your opponent the opportunity to prepare for wrinkles you revealed in September and October.
Posted by Newgene
Waveland, MS
Member since Nov 2005
7235 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:56 am to
quote:

We are a defensive minded team with an unbelievable 2 deep. Let's let our defense win as many games for us this year as we can.


Agree. If you are JC, how in the heck do you evaluate who is first team and who is second team? I mean there is absolutely no drop off between any of them.
Posted by fishngrits
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2008
449 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:58 am to
Exactly. When you have a huge o-line, and studs like Ware and Ford to pound the ball down the throat of opposing teams, there's no need for a lot of unnecessary bullshite. Just do what you do best.

Hanging 40 pts. on the number three team in the nation ain't too shabby.
Posted by Newgene
Waveland, MS
Member since Nov 2005
7235 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 9:58 am to
I'm not worried about the play-calling. We know Les is capable of crazy trick plays. I'm sure we'll see more of the Ware-throwing type plays from last year.

I think there is want to run the trick plays, and the team will run them when ready.
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10173 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 10:00 am to
NO SHORT SIDE OPTION!

I did see a team run a short side option yesterday and they gained 7 or 8 yds with it.

The offense looked 100% better, I don't know if this was due to minus JJ or GC.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 9/4/11 at 10:15 am to
quote:

More than the play-calling itself was the change of pace no huddle attack in the 3rd quarter that I think changed the game for LSU.

Hard to believe that only 1 poster mentioned this. It turned the game around. After that, the Ore defense was spent.

As for overall grade -- a B. And that's grading on a curve since they only had a week or so to game plan for Lee. You can run the ball and still mix up the plays more. We did that in the second half (after running left the whole first half) with some counters to the right with Ford.

If Lee is the starter, we need to run plays that take advantage of his strength -- quick throws. Slants, wide-out screens, 3 step drop throws, and screen passes (because we all know that Lee can throw moving backwards).
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram