- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:48 pm to drizztiger
quote:
You do understand running teams having better TOP are inherently penalized by Points per TOP equation?
Yes, which is why I left it out.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:54 pm to drizztiger
quote:
See me in 2014.
I'll meet you at the Singularity...
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:55 pm to LSUTigahBait
quote:Understood.
Yes, which is why I left it out.
For me I this discussion. You have done a great job to expose some of the misconceptions.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:58 pm to drizztiger
I don't understand why this isn't a more voiced statistic. It's not hard to calculate and if you put some SOS factors in there you have one of the most comprehensive stats.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:59 pm to LSUTigahBait
Very nice work, a good fresh look at stats to glean some real meaning from them.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:07 pm to LSUTigahBait
Good Stuff. I like this. What about sticking with what you originally calculated and adding the variable TOP.
Points Scored / yards / minutes = Explosiveness of Offense or should we say Explosiveness of Team since Defensive points are in these numbers.
LSU would be fourth in the BCS top ten by using this equation. Right behind Oregon,Houston,Okie state.
Disclaimer - quick calculations here.
Points Scored / yards / minutes = Explosiveness of Offense or should we say Explosiveness of Team since Defensive points are in these numbers.
LSU would be fourth in the BCS top ten by using this equation. Right behind Oregon,Houston,Okie state.
Disclaimer - quick calculations here.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:10 pm to LSUTigahBait
So Arkansas' defense is on par with Houston and slightly better than Boise?
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:11 pm to lsugumbeaux
TOP hurts teams with good running games which is why I didn't include it. We discussed it above
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:14 pm to TigerNavyDoc
quote:
I wouldn't go so far as to call us the best offense, but it's impressive nonetheless
If you cannot say best, perhaps you could say "most efficient"
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:19 pm to LSUTigahBait
quote:
I don't understand why this isn't a more voiced statistic
A team that leads in stats such as these may not be flashy because it doesn't necessarily put up a lot of points.
That doesn't mean the team isn't good or even great, just more efficient in their scoring.
Since the media is all about scoring points on offense and limiting them on defense, that team just may not be as good for discussion as one that does otherwise.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:23 pm to LSUTigahBait
You and lsumatt should have a love child together. I surmise the kid would be the Rantard equivalent of Good Will Hunting.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:24 pm to flipper70538
That is outstanding work
I didn't read all 4 pages so it may have been suggested, but you might consider doing Yards per Point so you're dealing with real numbers instead of thousandths and tens of thousandths in decimals. Either way, very impressive
I didn't read all 4 pages so it may have been suggested, but you might consider doing Yards per Point so you're dealing with real numbers instead of thousandths and tens of thousandths in decimals. Either way, very impressive
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:28 pm to AstroTiger
quote:
I didn't read all 4 pages so it may have been suggested, but you might consider doing Yards per Point so you're dealing with real numbers instead of thousandths and tens of thousandths in decimals. Either way, very impressive
That was my suggestion. Same data, better numbers, and it's already out there without having to do the work
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:28 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
I enjoyed reading the OP because it seemed to explain why I've enjoyed watching LSU so much this year.
i enjoyed this post b/c it was possibly the perfect example of confirmation bias, which this thread had a ton of
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:31 pm to LSUTigahBait
Good data.
Beat the Hawgs!!
Beat the Hawgs!!
Posted on 11/21/11 at 9:32 pm to LSUTigahBait
I was fiddling around with looking at LSU's average starting position when we start a scoring drive, which is pretty relevant to what you have here. I never got really far because I didn't know a good way to gather all that data. If anyone knows a good way about this, I think it would be pretty enlightening as well.
One thing I'm not sure has been brought up in the thread yet is, isn't this stat highly correlative to Turnover Margin? Not sure if we are leading in T/O margin but I know we are up there, and that would contribute to our better field position from our strategic punting.
Thoughts?
P.S. Nice work btw
One thing I'm not sure has been brought up in the thread yet is, isn't this stat highly correlative to Turnover Margin? Not sure if we are leading in T/O margin but I know we are up there, and that would contribute to our better field position from our strategic punting.
Thoughts?
P.S. Nice work btw
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News