Started By
Message

re: PMAC is an underrated facility

Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:01 am to
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3156 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:01 am to
quote:

They can still do this with a circular arena.


It's actually oval-shaped.
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2576 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:33 am to
I think the PMAC is rated about what it should be, mostly because the outside looks terrible. If we built a facility that was the same size as the PMAC but also incorporated the themes from campus it would be phenomenal. That being said, we are lucky to have a facility that can hold so many people and is of much higher quality than many in the SEC. We should really start taking advantage of this.

The real question is how can we have such bad facilities in the other sports compared to the others in the SEC. I understand having some bad ones, like the Natatorium, building a new Nat would be crazy expensive because of the technical aspects. But what about easier facilities, indoor track, Tennis courts/indoor tennis facility/ a legit Gymnastics practice facility. I know Rome wasn't built in a day, and I guess we are starting to see improvement (i.e. softball, baseball, outdoor track, soccer) but I think we should see more, hopefully it is on the way.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 11:34 am
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

The real question is how can we have such bad facilities in the other sports compared to the others in the SEC. I understand having some bad ones, like the Natatorium, building a new Nat would be crazy expensive because of the technical aspects. But what about easier facilities, indoor track, Tennis courts/indoor tennis facility/ a legit Gymnastics practice facility. I know Rome wasn't built in a day, and I guess we are starting to see improvement (i.e. softball, baseball, outdoor track, soccer) but I think we should see more, hopefully it is on the way.


They are planning if not already building a new tennis facility and are planning a gymnastic practice facility. I was a kinesiology major at LSU and spent a lot of time in the Maddox field house, it has good bones but it needs some renovation bad.

LINK
Posted by Yung_Humma
Member since Oct 2013
834 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 11:27 pm
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3156 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

spent a lot of time in the Maddox field house, it has good bones but it needs some renovation bad.


In the 1970s, LSU had the best athletic facilities in the SEC--new basketball arena, new track stadium, new tennis stadium, new field house, the new natitorium was in the works (of course, Tiger Stadium and Alex Box were old but were still two great facilities). Heck, as recently as the early 1990s, LSU used to host the SEC indoor track championship every other year because Florida was the only other SEC school that even had a field house! Now LSU is behind the rest of the conference in most facilities...
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34146 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

If we built a facility that was the same size as the PMAC but also incorporated the themes from campus it would be phenomenal.


That's part of the problem. LSU has gotten away from the overall theme the past 10-15 yrs and it shows. Many bldgs are out place or simply head scratchers.

quote:

The real question is how can we have such bad facilities in the other sports compared to the others in the SEC


LSU athletics simply doesn't have the money to compete with the other SEC schools since no state dollars funding athletics and Athletics required to give 7.2M back to the university every year.

Several of the other SEC schools have very wealthy boosters. LSU has a few but not to the level as Florida, Arkansas, Alabama, and now Texas A&M
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2576 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

They are planning if not already building a new tennis facility and are planning a gymnastic practice facility. I was a kinesiology major at LSU and spent a lot of time in the Maddox field house, it has good bones but it needs some renovation bad.


That's good, I'm glad that they are working to solve those problems. I just hope that now that we are doing so well financially (athletics at least), the school continues to improve and maintain those facilities from here on out, and not let them fall apart like they did in the 90's.

Edit: Mudminnow, do you think that we are still at a disadvantage financially at this moment in time? Or is it that we are trying to get out of the hole that the athletics dept. was in 20 years ago. (low funding, putting of maintenance and repair)
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 1:06 pm
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39980 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

That's part of the problem. LSU has gotten away from the overall theme the past 10-15 yrs and it shows. Many bldgs are out place or simply head scratchers.

The 1970s were 10-15 years ago?
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34146 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

do you think that we are still at a disadvantage financially at this moment in time?


Yes, we have a lot of money coming in, much more so than at any time, but we also have a lot of money going out.

In addition to the 7.2M athletics gives to academics they also agreed two years ago to take over many other responsibilities that previously belonged to academics.

LSU and Louisiana suffered the largest education budget cuts of any school in the country. Athletics stepped up to the plate.

Posted by CecilShortsHisPants
One Foty Fo uh uh Magnolia Screet
Member since Oct 2012
2825 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:03 pm to
I've said this for years. It is easily one of the finer arenas in college hoops. Inside and out.
Which is why I always hate hearing excuses for our basketball failures like "We're a football town" and "We don't have the resources"
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

That's part of the problem. LSU has gotten away from the overall theme the past 10-15 yrs and it shows. Many bldgs are out place or simply head scratchers.


LSU got away from the theme in the 60's and 70's, but since then they have tried to go back, but they also add in some of the modern touches. I love the way the chemistry buildings add on and the biology building's add on look compared to the original buildings.
Posted by PrideofTheSEC
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
4982 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

First place I sat, I could hardly fit my legs and I'm only 5'10"
same for me, I'm 5'10" and i barely had room for my legs also
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram