- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/28/16 at 1:44 am to Schmelly
What in the frick is this....
Posted on 6/28/16 at 2:26 am to Schmelly
This thread is hilarious.
This post was edited on 6/28/16 at 2:48 am
Posted on 6/28/16 at 3:13 am to Schmelly
First off, Schmelly, your lb to kg conversion is wrong. 330 lbs is about 150 kg (not 726 kg).
Now for today's physics lesson...
Power is Energy/Time
The energy supplied by the lifter has to equal the final potential energy of the weight, which is given by:
Energy = Mass * Gravitational Acceleration * height
As a power clean lifts to the shoulder, this should be about 5 ft high (or 1.5 m) on a 6 ft tall football player. This gives:
Energy = 150 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 * 1.5 m = 2205 J
The power is then:
Power = (2205 J) / (1.2 s) = 1837.5 Watts which is about 2.5 horsepower.
- from your friendly neighborhood particle physicist
FYI - That means 660 clones of Fournette would be enough to supply the 1.21 gigawatts of power needed for Doc Brown to go back to the future.
Mountain Tiger is correct... Should be 660,000.
Now for today's physics lesson...
Power is Energy/Time
The energy supplied by the lifter has to equal the final potential energy of the weight, which is given by:
Energy = Mass * Gravitational Acceleration * height
As a power clean lifts to the shoulder, this should be about 5 ft high (or 1.5 m) on a 6 ft tall football player. This gives:
Energy = 150 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 * 1.5 m = 2205 J
The power is then:
Power = (2205 J) / (1.2 s) = 1837.5 Watts which is about 2.5 horsepower.
- from your friendly neighborhood particle physicist
FYI - That means 660 clones of Fournette would be enough to supply the 1.21 gigawatts of power needed for Doc Brown to go back to the future.
Mountain Tiger is correct... Should be 660,000.
This post was edited on 6/28/16 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 6/28/16 at 3:35 am to Schmelly
quote:
Odds this is the 1st physics question on the Rant?
quote:
Probably the first. Definitely the hardest.
No. I've been asked about shite like quantum mechanics and extra dimensions.
Ask Dreaux...
Posted on 6/28/16 at 7:38 am to DocBugbear
Lol @ the kg conversion. I wasn't paying attention. Did lb x 2.2 instead of /2.2
Congrats on being the only non-Ruhtard on the Rant
Posted on 6/28/16 at 9:25 am to DocBugbear
quote:
660 clones
660 thousand clones. 658,504 to be exact.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 9:56 am to biglego
I would have guessed Kieland Williams on account of the calfzilla's alone.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 10:10 am to Sev09
quote:
I don't know what to compare that to
go ask the sports science fig on ESPN. i'm sure it's as strong as "100,000 monkey penis thrusts at once" or something stupid like that.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 10:58 am to tpc63086
quote:
Photosynthesis!! BAM!
And THIS is ur first post? Lol
Posted on 6/28/16 at 11:04 am to Schmelly
The laws of physics don't apply to Buga
Posted on 6/28/16 at 11:06 am to biglego
Fournette is a blend of Addai and Ford..
Not as powerful as Addai, and not as strong as Ford. A combination of power, strength and speed that not many RBs have.
Not as powerful as Addai, and not as strong as Ford. A combination of power, strength and speed that not many RBs have.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 11:17 am to barry
quote:
The laws of physics don't apply to Buga
Valid point.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 11:22 am to barry
quote:
The laws of physics don't apply to Buga
That's because he created physics
Posted on 6/28/16 at 11:22 am to biglego
quote:
said that Joe Addai was the most powerful back LSU ever had and that Michael Ford was the strongest back LSU ever had.
Well that's a cool thing to read. I didn't know Ford was strongest. I would've thought Charles Scott or Alley Broussard.
Michael Ford was essentially a power lifter playing RB.
Guy was a fricking HOSS in the weight room and his body fat % was crazy low.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 11:36 am to Schmelly
fwiw, the math doesn't translate exactly to the field.
There's dozens of small data points from how he swings his arms to the relative balance of using quads vs hamstrings while running, to the way his feet contact the ground (and how much force is lost into the ground vs how much is preserved in forward momentum), to his core and shoulder strength, etc... All these things point to how efficiently he uses his strength/power on the field.
It would be impossible to track all those data points casually... If you had a lab and ran a series of tests over and over, maybe you could. But you can sort of get a sense of how efficient athletes are by watching them. Tyrann Mathieu comes to mind as perhaps the best example of an athlete with such outstanding body control that there seems no wasted movement. If he's making a tackle or stripping a ball, every part of him seems unified to that purpose. When LF hits his groove, he's definitely outstanding in that regard. But I don't know how you'd be able to assess that accurately.
There's dozens of small data points from how he swings his arms to the relative balance of using quads vs hamstrings while running, to the way his feet contact the ground (and how much force is lost into the ground vs how much is preserved in forward momentum), to his core and shoulder strength, etc... All these things point to how efficiently he uses his strength/power on the field.
It would be impossible to track all those data points casually... If you had a lab and ran a series of tests over and over, maybe you could. But you can sort of get a sense of how efficient athletes are by watching them. Tyrann Mathieu comes to mind as perhaps the best example of an athlete with such outstanding body control that there seems no wasted movement. If he's making a tackle or stripping a ball, every part of him seems unified to that purpose. When LF hits his groove, he's definitely outstanding in that regard. But I don't know how you'd be able to assess that accurately.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 2:59 pm to epbart
quote:
When LF hits his groove, he's definitely outstanding in that regard. But I don't know how you'd be able to assess that accurately.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 3:22 pm to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
He showed his whole toolbox on that run. The stutter-step to make the lineman miss, the speed to get to the edge and then the power at the end.
fricking
fricking
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:14 pm to MountainTiger
Don't forget his impact when he launched #19 3 yards through the air. You are right, has is all. No physics on that run.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News