Started By
Message

re: NCAA basketball minimum 2 year rule

Posted on 3/4/15 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36951 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

You are completely ignoring the fact that the employees of the professional associations you refer to are unionized. The actual players bargain for their best interest, which would include limiting the amount of cheap, inexperienced labor entering the workforce.
The union didn't want the minimum age requirement. The NBA did - at 20 years old. The NBPA compromised and agreed to 19.

My point is that age requirement shouldn't even be allowed to be
quote:

Further, what organization in the US doesnt employ baseline hiring practices? Im sure there are tons of students "ready" to join the workforce before they complete college, however that doesn't stop organizations from only hiring those with minimum qualifications (a degree)
Again, age shouldn't be a qualification. A degree is a qualification. There are 18 year olds with college degrees. An 18 year old adult shouldn't be excluded solely based on age. That's the argument.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20373 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

This is one I don't understand at all. It is amazing the NBA players don't change the rule to make them stay in college longer. Quite a few NBA players lose their jobs every year to these one and done players based on potential, not their actual performance. Every year, solid veteran players are out of the league to make room for a highly drafted rookie that often sits on the bench for years and never is the caliber of player they replaced.

As I heard this before, the NBA is the only entity that protects its future members better than their current members
The NBA has only themselves to blame. After Kobe Bryant and Kevin Garnett made the jump straight from high school, it became a free-for-all. Every high school kid with any game wanted to go straight to the pros, and the NBA teams started drafting anyone with a pulse who might develop into a good player. What resulted has seriously hurt basketball as a sport. Sure, some kids got rich (sounds like that's their only real motivation), and one team got Lebron James.

But the vast majority of these guys never made any impact, and the college game was slaughtered. Both levels of play declined from a technical standpoint.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36951 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

So how else can they document and enforce minimum "qualifications"? Require them to have a degree in an irrelevant field? You are oversimplifying the intent of the rule. The NBA would prefer kids coming into the league with at least one year of coaching by a professional (not some nobody AAU coach) .
I understand the intent of the NBA, but the rule itself is disqualification based on age exclusively - which I believe should be illegal.

These players in general play one year in college or D-League or Europe, but that is not in the rule at all.

The player simply has to wait a year. Literally nothing else. A player could literally sit on his couch eating potato chips and playing xbox for the year, AND then be eligible to enter the draft. Think about how ridiculous that sounds.

Yet, that's the rule. You are ineligible for the draft and must wait one year, then you will be able to register for the draft. The only requirement is the year wait - nothing else.

Of course the intent is to force the players into a pseudo farm system for evaluation. The problem is the NBA isn't employing them and is refusing them employment based solely on one criteria: date of birth. Not talent, maturity, strength, endurance, vertical, etc. Just date of birth.

I believe it is restrictive to free trade to bar an adult from a appyling for a job. If he isn't qualified he won't get hired, that simple. The other guy used NASA for some idiotic reason.

If you are qualified, NASA does not have an age requirement and will hire you at 18.

The only valid point made is the age requirements for POTUS, etc. Guess what? I disagree with that as well.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20014 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

An 18 year old adult shouldn't be excluded solely based on age. That's the argument.


I appreciate that, and you have been steadfast in that stance. However, there are other factors at play here, the rule is not in place simply to restrict people of a certain age. What you are arguing is to change the rule to exclude any language about age restrictions. Sure thats fine, you tell me what that criteria should be so that it is fair for each individual, and would also accomplish the goal the NBA has.

Also, I think my last argument about age being 19 does have merit, as it protects both teams and individuals.

It really seems like you only see this argument from a players perspective.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36951 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

It really seems like you only see this argument from a players perspective.
I am seeing this from what I consider an ethical perspective.

If 18 is the age by which a person is considered an adult, then that person should have all rights afforded to all adults. If congress wants to set it at 16, 19, 21, 25, I personally don't care.

I just have an ethical issue with an 18 year old "adult" being mature and responsible enough to join the military, fight in wars around the world, marry his girlfriend, adopt and be legal guardian to a child, but doesn't satisfy the arbitrary age requirement of the NBA.

quote:

Sure thats fine, you tell me what that criteria should be so that it is fair for each individual, and would also accomplish the goal the NBA has.
The NBA should pony up and support a farm system. It's that simple. Btw, it doesn't have to be elaborate. Even a supplemental draft for HS graduates in which if a player is drafted, he's paid minimum wage and placed in a 2 team developmental league.

I find it interesting that no one argues over whether 17 year old HS baseball players should be allowed to go pro, or 14 year tennis phenoms.
This post was edited on 3/4/15 at 1:58 pm
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
7338 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

I wish they would do like baseball. You either go out of high school, or you don't




That would be stupid for basketball. There's a big diff between the two and I'm sure I don't need to explain it. The basketball players would never go to college
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41179 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

I think the 1-year rule along with 3 years for NFL (or 2+ age) are unconstitutional. But when you have billions dollar revenue entities (NBA, NFL) hand shaking with other billion dollar revenue entities (NCAA), they get to make up the rules for themselves.


No they don't & no it isn't unconstitutional. The age issue was part of the collective bargain. The rule won't change until the 2017 season with regard to the NBA.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20014 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 8:36 am to
quote:

If 18 is the age by which a person is considered an adult, then that person should have all rights afforded to all adults. If congress wants to set it at 16, 19, 21, 25, I personally don't care.


I find it interesting that you have ignored my argument that the 19 yo rule effectively ensures that the player is 18 at the time of the draft.(and when he signs with an agent for that matter). If this weren't the case, a kid could conceivably void his contract with his agent and/or team while 17, and the team could to nothing about it.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20014 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I find it interesting that no one argues over whether 17 year old HS baseball players should be allowed to go pro, or 14 year tennis phenoms.


This thread is about basketball, the same arguments get made for baseball when the timing is relevant. Whether they are driven by self interest is irrelevant.

And dude, tennis? What about chess? I, like most American sport fans, tune in for the grand slam events, if I am going to watch any tennis...never seen an eighth grader out there. Its also not a team sport which is half the equation here.


Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I find it interesting that you have ignored my argument that the 19 yo rule effectively ensures that the player is 18 at the time of the draft.(and when he signs with an agent for that matter). If this weren't the case, a kid could conceivably void his contract with his agent and/or team while 17, and the team could to nothing about it.

Not true at all. The NBA set the age requirement to pretty much guarantee a year of college before getting drafted.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40798 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:31 am to
quote:

As I heard this before, the NBA is the only entity that protects its future members better than their current members.


The NFL says hello
Posted by rzd30
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2008
1108 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:49 am to
High school kids are looking at overseas the same way the rant is which is with little to no thinking.

I am for the rule being the baseball rule. But also having the same baseball rule for college basketball players which is not being talked about. If a player declares as a junior and does not get drafted or gets drafted in the second round, meaning no guaranteed deal, they can come back as long as they don't sign. Much like a baseball junior or HS stud, that does not get the money they want.

Overseas is a terrible option for most young kids. Most have never lived on their own for an extended period of time, much less deal with large sums of money. Playing in countries where they do not speak the language for the most part, and are not these tropical paradises, overseas is made out to be. Very few overseas players make north of $250K. Yes, the argument will be a kid from the inner city that now has to wait three years, has an offer from a club in Europe or the rest of the world to play for $100,000 a year and that would certainly support his family. Problem is there are so many horror stories of Americans in particular, that never even visit the country, team, or where they are even going to live before signing, and arriving to find almost the exact opposite of what they expect.

Away from America and your family for 6-7 months. With literally nothing but basketball. If you are lucky maybe two others guys that speak any English at all on the team, and freezing your butt off for a paycheck that may never come.

The better competition is also not what it is made out to be. Yes the top European division, a handful of Chinese/East Asian teams, Israeli league, and probably 10-12 other teams worldwide that NBA coaches would even know much less respect. Some of these divisions, are glorified Adult Leauges.


The real problem with the entire NBA/college/hs dynamic is that compared to baseball, football, and basketball. Basketball you have the slimmest chance of "making it", that is making and signing with an NBA roster for an entire season, just to get the minimum. Only 30 new guys a year are guaranteed a spot in the NBA. If you are not a guaranteed first round pick, or guaranteed roster guy (JOB3), you should not leave school and miss out on a degree. Kids forever have left for various reasons and will continue to do so. So trying to conceive what they are thinking, who is in their ear, and their family situations is pointless, because you just don't know.

The NBA has recognized it and agrees, they do have an obligation to protect kids from trying to make that jump when they are not ready. It makes for a better NBA product, and a better college game. What the NBA is struggling with is the "Lebron James" problem. Every couple of years you will get a HS kid that blows everyone out of the water, that is a sure-fire Top-5 pick, whether he is a stud or bust does not matter. The hype and publicity these guys get at such a young age brings a lot of attention and added revenue to the league, that quite frankly if they go to a strict two and done, they lose the one and dones, and high school phenoms that are there cash cows.

Yes a player like Lebron James would have been successful whether he came straight out of HS, one, two, or 3 years in college. Then there is Brandon Jennings who went overseas, skipping college and made a lot of money and still got drafted very high. But look at Jeremy Tyler as the worst tragedy of them all. Now there is Emmanuel Mudiay who is making a terrible mistake to go play overseas, it may work out and I hope it does but odds are against him.

Even Brandon Jennings and scouts agreed had he gone to college and torn it up probably a higher pick. Enes Kanter had a decision to play overseas or go to Kentucky knowing he may have to sit out. He chose Kentucky and even though he had to sit out, he got drafted high because scouts were able to pick up a phone call Cal and ask about him. They were able to know he got atleast one year of great basketball instruction. The NBA does not need a "minor league", yes an expanded D-Leauge would improve the product, but not by much. College basketball is the greatest minor league for every sport, because at the end of the day, college athletics and the NCAA for all of its flaws, has risen and grown. The blue bloods in every sport, will continue to make college athletics the next best thing to the pros.

to LSU athletics I hope they continue to (football,baseball) and now renew it in basketball, sending guys early to their respective pro-leauges early, we have one of the best minor league universities in the nation
Posted by sassyLSU
Lake Charles, La.
Member since May 2011
2080 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Moving to this for basketball would be great IMO.



when you could go from high school to NBA, it led to a few basketball players who were not ready for NBA (emotionally or just basketball) being out of the pros at 19 and no prospects in life.

in baseball, a guy can bumble in the minors for 5 or 6 years before the team really gives up on him. once in a while a guy comes up to the majors after 8 or 10 years in the minors. its obvious in most basketball cases in 90 days. D league is supposed to address those guys and maybe it does. basketball failures do not count the coke users, famous 1st rounders. and not just Len Bias.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20014 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Not true at all. The NBA set the age requirement to pretty much guarantee a year of college before getting drafted.


The part you chose to bold is absolutely true.

Also, the age limit is only part of the rule, with the year out of high school being a seperate additional requirement. I also clearly gave a more detailed reason than you did earlier in the thread, so no need to argue with me.
Posted by cheeser
downtown Fishville
Member since Feb 2007
2500 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 1:52 pm to
Who would be going to pay to watch these games ?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram