Started By
Message

re: LSU has trailed in the 4th qtr 37% of the time total & 63% against quality opps

Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:33 am to
Posted by Starrkevious Ringo
Member since Jul 2014
723 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:33 am to
Miles may be a crappy coach in plenty of areas, but if we're going to acknowledge that, we also need to acknowledge that recruiting and conditioning is also part of that thing called "coaching".

We know he's a lousy game day coach. That is unquestionable.

If we're to be totally honest, though, the fact that he has the kind of overall winning percentage that he does means that (thankfully) there are other components of coaching.

The real question everyone is dancing around here is "Has Miles finally run his course?"

It happens. He may have.

Let's revisit when the season is over.
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:34 am to
quote:

We win, but this stat shows we often win ugly, ultimately because of superior conditioning coupled with talent.


No surprise that your dumbass would start a thread that contains this sentence.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57276 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Miles may be a crappy coach in plenty of areas, but if we're going to acknowledge that, we also need to acknowledge that recruiting and conditioning is also part of that thing called "coaching".


Moffit is the conditioning coach.

And if you want to state your argument, then it's Miles' fault and his alone the team is "young" and inexperienced.

Part of recruiting is recruiting ON A SCHEDULE.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83535 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:45 am to
quote:

If you have better talent than 90% of the teams you play, a mediocre coach would be ahead in the 4th quarter 90% of the time, and win 90% of his games.




just
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41292 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:47 am to
The funny thing is that people like a want say those things as if they are cold hard facts.
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:53 am to
Please explain the hilarity.

If you remove coaching from the equation, how many games should a team win when that team is more talented than 90% of the teams it plays?
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83535 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:54 am to
quote:

how many games should a team win when that team is more talented than 90% of the teams it plays?


is LSU more talented than 90% of the teams it plays?
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38119 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:58 am to
So you're saying we know how to finish games?
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41292 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 7:58 am to
quote:

So you're saying we know how to finish games?



Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:01 am to
quote:

is LSU more talented than 90% of the teams it plays?

Yes. Maybe not this year b/c of youth, but generally speaking yes.

On average over the last 10 years we have been more talented than:
Arkansas
Miss State
Ole Miss
A&M
Auburn

From the East:
Everybody but maybe Georgia and Florida: they're comparable.

Plus the 2 or 3 rent-a-win/non conference teams.

Alabama is the only one who has been more talented consistently than us.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58566 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:02 am to
quote:

So you're saying we know how to finish games?


Sometimes we do. Sometimes we let inferior teams finish us. Sometimes, because of incompetent clock management we can't. Sometimes we need help from Dooley because he can't count. Sometimes an 0'for SEC Arky team snatches defeat from the jaws of victory because of a lucky play. Sometimes shite happens, but there is a definite pattern and practice with miles coached teams, which is frustrating.
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:03 am to
quote:

So you're saying we know how to finish games?

No, I'm saying LSU is behind far too often in the 4th quarter to teams it should be beating.

Now you can say a win is a win, but sloppy play is sloppy play even when you win. Coming back and beating ULM in the 4th quarter is not something to celebrate. Teams who have to come back against ULM are NOT going to beat teams that actually DO have more talent.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:04 am to
quote:

If you have better talent than 90% of the teams you play, a mediocre coach would be ahead in the 4th quarter 90% of the time, and win 90% of his games.


wtf?
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Dude, give it a rest. You're in every single thread I've read defending Miles


what's your point?
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83535 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:05 am to
quote:

On average over the last 10 years we have been more talented than:
Arkansas
Miss State
Ole Miss
A&M
Auburn


what is LSUs record against those teams over the last 10 years?

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162209 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

When half the teams we play are teams like Middle Tennessee, Louisiana Tech, ULL, ULM, Towson, Furman, Tulane, Troy, North Texas, Sam Houston State, New Mexico State, McNeese State, UAB, Fresno State, Appalacian State, Northwestern State, Western Kentucky, Idaho, Kent State, second rate OOC teams and SEC bottom feeders... I'd say yeah. For a program the caliber of LSU to only be leading or tied 63% in the 4th is not great.

We play over half of our games in conference and almost every year we play at least one quality opponent out of conference.

Wisconsin this year
Sometimes we play more than one quality opponent out of conference. In 2011 we played West Virginia and Oregon
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38119 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Now you can say a win is a win, but sloppy play is sloppy play even when you win. Coming back and beating ULM in the 4th quarter is not something to celebrate. Teams who have to come back against ULM are NOT going to beat teams that actually DO have more talent.


What on God's green Earth are you talking about? When were we down to ULM in the 4th? You just making up stuff?
Posted by PacLSU
I have been a
Member since Sep 2003
3630 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Teams who have to come back against ULM are NOT going to beat teams that actually DO have more talent.

How about teams that lose to ULM?
Posted by lsusteltz16
LaGrange, Ga
Member since Nov 2007
876 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:48 am to
I was curious, so I crunched the stats.
I only included ranked OOC games and all SEC games to throw out cupcakes.


LSU has trailed 63% of the time in the 4th qtr against ranked OOC opponents and all SEC opponents combined.


For comparison, Bama has trailed only 27% of the time in the 4th qtr against ranked OOC opponents and all SEC opponents. This includes Bama's terrible 07 season.

LSU has been an outlier statistically in the W column based on these stats.
This post was edited on 10/7/14 at 8:50 am
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:51 am to
That's like saying, we only win because of our ability to play defense. Who cares it's part of the game
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram