- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lee did a good job. . .and should remain the starter
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:19 am to Palm Beach Tiger
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:19 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:no.
Stop being so tragically stupid.
quote:FTW.
Good lord, I didn't realize you were one of these rant retards. You made a comparison of Jarrett Lee to Danny Weurful based on their velocity as if the velocity didn't seem to hurt Weurful. It didn't hurt Weurful because he was so extremely accurate. Much more so then Jarrett Lee. So your comparison fails. I know you are trying to compare one thing and leave out another. Unfortunately, it can't be done.
0
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:20 am to ZTiger87
quote:Please explain this.
You made a very idiotic comparison.
I didn't compare Weurffel to Lee. I compared Weurffel's velocity to Lee's.
You guys are just embarrassingly stupid.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:23 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:Correct.
ou made a comparison of Jarrett Lee to Danny Weurful based on their velocity as if the velocity didn't seem to hurt Weurful.
quote:Sure. He was great at placing the ball.
It didn't hurt Weurful because he was so extremely accurate.
quote:Correct.
Much more so then Jarrett Lee.
quote:No, it doesn't.
So your comparison fails.
The point was that high velocity is not essential to being a successful QB.
FTW
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:24 am to Roaad
quote:
Please explain this.
I didn't compare Weurffel to Lee. I compared Weurffel's velocity to Lee's.
You guys are just embarrassingly stupid.
Wow, just wow.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:25 am to ZTiger87
quote:Irony.
Wow, just wow.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:28 am to drizztiger
Most of you guys are talking out of your arse if you think Zach Mettenberger did better than Jarrett Lee...
Jarrett Lee and his first string starters torn this defense apart by halftime. Zach was on mop up duty against a worn down defense...
Rueben Randle had 121 passing yards, that alone should tell you something...
Mettenberger threw a bomb and wasn't even close, enough said.
Jarrett Lee and his first string starters torn this defense apart by halftime. Zach was on mop up duty against a worn down defense...
Rueben Randle had 121 passing yards, that alone should tell you something...
Mettenberger threw a bomb and wasn't even close, enough said.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:28 am to Roaad
Yes, Lee is still the starter. I don't think there's an argument about that. I was at the game too, and Mett is definitely better. This doesn't mean I don't support Lee, I'm just acknowledging that it was very evident tonight how good Mett is and how good he will be.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:28 am to Roaad
quote:
Irony.
It is stupid to point to a flaw in a player and go "hey he did good so this isn't a requirement to be a good player!" Jarrett Lee has nothing to back up weak arm strength. Your point and comparrison is retarded. But hey you know, Tebow didn't have a strong arm and wasn't very accurate so I guess Lee will be just fine.
This post was edited on 9/11/11 at 12:30 am
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:29 am to ZTiger87
quote:
Jarrett Lee has nothing to back up weak arm strength.
if Lee has a weak arm, this would be a good point.
but he doesn't. it's at least as strong as Jeffersons. Mett has a Mallett type arm. Lee probably has a better arm than matt flynn did..
This post was edited on 9/11/11 at 12:31 am
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:31 am to ZTiger87
quote:His velocity wasn't a "flaw". . .it was just how he played football.
It is stupid to point to a flaw in a player
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:32 am to Roaad
quote:
The point was that high velocity is not essential to being a successful QB.
YES it is UNLESS you happen to be the most accurate college QB in the last quarter century.
bad comparison.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:32 am to bmy
quote:I agree with all points but 2.
if Lee has a weak arm, this would be a good point.
but he doesn't. it's at least as strong as Jeffersons. Mett has a Mallett type arm. Lee probably has a better arm than matt flynn did..
-Mett does NOT have a Mallet arm.
-JJ had a stronger arm than Lee.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:33 am to bayoubengals88
quote:
YES it is UNLESS you happen to be the most accurate college QB in the last quarter century.
and Lee has a nice balance. he has enough accuracy and enough velocity.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:34 am to bmy
quote:
Lee has a weak arm, this would be a good point
Look at the number of passes he has underthrown. Look at the number of deeper passes that WRs have to stop and wait on.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:35 am to Roaad
quote:
His velocity wasn't a "flaw". . .it was just how he played football.
It was his biggest flaw. He had a way to deal with it, Lee doesn't. Your point was terrible.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:36 am to bmy
Lee has high velocity when he sets.
My point is that it is not essential to being a good QB.
My point is that it is not essential to being a good QB.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:37 am to ZTiger87
quote:In the NFL, sure.
It was his biggest flaw.
In college it was never even brought up. . .unless the topic was his projection at the next level.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:38 am to Roaad
quote:I keep waiting for this to happen.
Lee has high velocity when he sets.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:39 am to bayoubengals88
quote:If he keeps going 9-10, you can wait until the creek rises for all I care.
I keep waiting for this to happen.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 12:40 am to Roaad
I agree
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News