Started By
Message

re: La'el Collins reportedly signing with Cowboys

Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by Nawlens Gator
louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
5836 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:51 pm to

I hope Collins is cleared, but this is what worries me:

Collin's is a great talent and several NFL teams wanted him. They spent a good deal of time and money getting inside info (these guys are smart pros) from investigators, police, and others close to this situation and decided not to touch him, even in late draft rounds. They didn't just back away because of rumors. They got way more facts than any poster in this thread has and backed off.

Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:52 pm to
Are you insinuating that pro teams bribed the BRPD?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166326 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

They got way more facts than
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85067 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:53 pm to
I get the sarcasm... I'm not saying the cops are lying. I'm saying it doesn't mean as much as what everyone thinks/wants it to mean. It almost means nothing in this situation.

For about 10 years now cops have learned that the less info they give out in some instances, the more success they'll have with investigations. Naming suspects, talking about evidence, giving timelines, etc. have all become huge no-no's because they can make a cop's job more difficult.

As a simple example, if an investigator puts out a name or tries to get in touch with someone and calls them a "suspect", they are more likely to be less cooperative. But if someone is just called in for questioning or labeled a POI, then they are often less defensive. I'm not saying that's what's happening here in that La'el is a "suspect" underneath it all. Just that what the police say during an investigation has very little value.
Posted by GeauxToBed
Covington, LA
Member since Mar 2015
6113 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:53 pm to
Would it shock you if they did?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166326 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Would it shock you if they did?


If 32 teams know something, there's a 100% chance it would have been leaked.
Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:55 pm to
It definitely would surprise me. No need to risk that much for a franchise over one potential player.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15190 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

absolute isn't a suspect man.



He is certainly suspect, though.
Posted by Will2nd
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
3944 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

They didn't just back away because of rumors.


They backed away because the information they could get was unclear. Sean Payton said as much.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166326 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:



He is certainly suspect, though.


link to associated press article?
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24837 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:56 pm to
By your own logic the right reply should've been no comment.
This post was edited on 5/4/15 at 3:57 pm
Posted by Will2nd
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
3944 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

If 32 teams know something, there's a 100% chance it would have been leaked.


...by Adam Schefter.
This post was edited on 5/4/15 at 3:59 pm
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10460 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

They got way more facts than any poster in this thread has and backed off.


You realize we live in a society now that is social media obsessed and the media hit a team would take on this would be pretty substantial even if the guy is innocent right? This isn't the 90's and early 2000's when teams can have murderers on their teams and let the legal system work it out.

Hell, you just had an NFL player convicted of one murder and on trial for two more. On top of that, you have numerous domestic and physical abuse issues around the league, and you think that their even willing to take on a guy with this type of media baggage?

It sucks for La'el if he's innocent, but this is the world today because of idiots on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and message boards that need to know everything all the time and want to be known.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85067 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:58 pm to
By my own logic the police don't want anyone feeling like a suspect. They don't want anyone they talk to to feel attacked. They want people to cooperate.

Usually, the only time suspects names are released is because the police are looking for them and might need to publics help or to warn the public of a possible danger.

This post was edited on 5/4/15 at 4:00 pm
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57708 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

quote: Would it shock you if they did? If 32 teams know something, there's a 100% chance it would have been leaked.


Not necessarily. But I think it was probably the fact that the way he acted and responded made him look like he at least was hiding something even if he wasn't. With all the domestic dispute stuff the NFL has had lately, they want to stay far away.
Posted by npt817
Prairieville, LA
Member since Sep 2010
1370 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Collin's is a great talent and several NFL teams wanted him. They spent a good deal of time and money getting inside info (these guys are smart pros) from investigators, police, and others close to this situation and decided not to touch him, even in late draft rounds. They didn't just back away because of rumors. They got way more facts than any poster in this thread has and backed off.


LOL, so now the NFL has solved the case even before the BRPD has. Awesome. This is the same NFL that couldn't get a video tape for the Ray Rice fiasco though, right?

Or is it more plausible that they backed away because of the PR nightmare it would cause if he were to be arrested down the line. I know its not as sexy of a story but sounds more realistic to me.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15190 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

They backed away because the information they could get was unclear. Sean Payton said as much.


They backed away because the league decided to.
Posted by Will2nd
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
3944 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

LOL, so now the NFL has solved the case even before the BRPD has. Awesome. This is the same NFL that couldn't get a video tape for the Ray Rice fiasco though, right?


I was thinking the same thing.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166326 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 4:04 pm to
makes you wonder theoretically speaking what's the line on type of action a player is deemed associated with for all 32 teams to pass on drafting a player.

A rape allegation?
A bad domestic violence issue?
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11296 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

They didn't just back away because of rumors.


Please stick around Jethro. You fit in great with all the droolers here. Oh and Derrrrrrp.
Jump to page
Page First 35 36 37 38 39 ... 65
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 37 of 65Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram