- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just Finished Watching the Game Again: I Was Wrong
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:22 am to Burt Reynolds
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:22 am to Burt Reynolds
Of course if they keep running they win and they tried but that was being stuffed in the second half. If our offense would of been more complex in the first half we would've won more comfortably also.
0
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:24 am to Dale Doubak
quote:
I agree....first half looked horrible
It was really the second quarter and the beginning of the third. The first quarter wasn't that bad at all
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:35 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
Wrong
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
wtf were you watching they kept running the ball and got stuffed ...
the only time they stopped running was when they got behind at the end of the game ...
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:48 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
You are probably just trolling... but If you are serious:
This was addressed very well by this thread OP:
link
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:49 am to AlaTiger
All of those QB keepers where Jennings made the read and kept the ball paid off. In the 4th quarter when Hilliard had those runs, both the linebacker and defensive end bite on Jennings and leave the hole wide open for Hilliard.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:04 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
Ehh, we held on to the ball and sustained longer drives just like Miles said we needed at half. They ran it, just didn't didn't have the amount of plays because we held onto it and finally established the run. We grew into the game and have a very young squad. Many firsts for a lot of guys out there. Watching diarse beast his way in is very encouraging.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:55 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to rewatch the game, maybe you were drunk.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:11 am to Burt Reynolds
DEAR Burt Reynolds,
You are a douche bag who probably thinks Les Miles wins with Nick Sabans talent. If by some miracle you are a true LSU Tiger Fan then bring something, ANYTHING, positive to this board.
Sincerely,
Tiger Nation
You are a douche bag who probably thinks Les Miles wins with Nick Sabans talent. If by some miracle you are a true LSU Tiger Fan then bring something, ANYTHING, positive to this board.
Sincerely,
Tiger Nation
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:28 am to geauxtigers6492
quote:
LSU shut them down after the first possession of the second half. A light switch kicked on and our Run D showed up making ALOT of tackles at the line or behind it!
It wasnt simply that a "light switched on"....its bc of coaching adjustments relative to the opposing scheme and the strengths and weaknesses, therein. Its not some magical circumstance that makes players do well or not
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:58 am to geauxtigers6492
It's pretty obvious......if Wisconsin had any sort of ok qb play, they would've won that game.
Lsu did what they had to do. I think Jennings is good enough to be our qb for the year.
Lsu did what they had to do. I think Jennings is good enough to be our qb for the year.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:10 am to jdrumdog
If that game is played again tomorrow, LSU wins big, no matter what Wisconsin does. The only reason the score got out of hand was due to LSU's crap play calling in the first half. It was the first game of the season, and we basically spotted them a half.
Letting LSU get more of their suspended players back in the game would only make it worse, too.
Letting LSU get more of their suspended players back in the game would only make it worse, too.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:18 am to Chadwick
quote:
The screen passes alone could have did some damage if caught
We have too much talent in the backfield to not utilize the screen game more.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:18 am to jdrumdog
quote:
It's pretty obvious......if Wisconsin had any sort of ok qb play, they would've won that game
False. Their receivers couldn't get open against LSU's secondary, the Wisconsin QB had no one to throw to.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:52 am to LuckyTiger
What you saw the entire game was LSU playing without what...5 players? Starting center, cb and a couple DT.
Even so, cry me a river. LSU should feel bad for winning? Injuries are part if the game. I dont care if Wisconsin got mad and forfeited. Its a win
Even so, cry me a river. LSU should feel bad for winning? Injuries are part if the game. I dont care if Wisconsin got mad and forfeited. Its a win
Posted on 9/2/14 at 6:56 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
I love when people that don't understand football pretend that they do. You seem to do that a lot. You are dead wrong BTW. The running game was shut the frick down. The scary thing for them is we only used 3 DTs in the game and they only got stronger as the game went on.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 6:58 am to BillyBobfan24_7
I watched the game again
LSU shut down the running game in the second half.
contrary to belief, Gorton actually played in half of the 6 2nd half possessions ...He was shut down, they were locked down.
LSU shut down the running game in the second half.
contrary to belief, Gorton actually played in half of the 6 2nd half possessions ...He was shut down, they were locked down.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 6:59 am to AlaTiger
Our line play on both sides of the ball was not that great. The only way we could stop the run was by stacking the box. This is not a good sign. Other than that I was encouraged.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 7:00 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:00 am to TigerBlood17
Let's try to remember this is a young new team...it's the first game of the year
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:03 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
I don't know why this got downvotes. They had no answer for Gordon, luckily he inexplicably left the game. The backup was nowhere as explosive and led them to pass more, which led to turnovers.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:14 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:
If Wisconsin would've kept running the ball, they would've won
They really couldn't. Watch what we did from the third on. We absolutely sold out to stop the run. We were in Zero or One coverage multiple times and playing straight one-on-one man coverage.
Now if you said "If Wisconsin had a mediocre QB, they would've one", I would agree with you. We wouldn't be able to go all out on the run against a team with any passing attack.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News