Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Is being an intellectual scheme coach more important than an emotional leader

Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:06 pm
Posted by ElysianArmsAlum
Maryland
Member since Dec 2006
964 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:06 pm
In college football, what pays off best in the long run?
Posted by SG_Geaux
1 Post
Member since Aug 2004
77929 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:07 pm to
Whatever Saban is doing is damn sure working.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:08 pm to
Both/either can be successful. There are enough examples on either side of the argument.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35253 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:09 pm to
You have to be both really. Miles was ONLY an emotional leader, and where did that get us?
Posted by CalTiger53
California
Member since Oct 2011
9034 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:11 pm to
No matter who the coach is having the top 2 recruiting classes regularly is far more important than anything else, that is what Saban is doing.
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4741 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:16 pm to
I think you need to quantify that more. It's also important to recruit well, have coordinators who are competant and who you trust to do their job, and allowing them to do so, and having a system in place that covers details and development. This is why I am not anti coach O at all. I think he learned what he did wrong previously, and is allowing his coordinators to do their job now. Let him recruit, put the system in place, and hire the best coordinators he can to do the job they are hired to do. Hiring a Herman means that you are hiring a great OC who is a head coach. That's not a knock on him at all, but if we hire a great OC with coach O, and he lets him do his job, are we really going to be upset with the product?
Posted by ElysianArmsAlum
Maryland
Member since Dec 2006
964 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:21 pm to
How would you describe Saban when he was at LSU? He was a process guy but it seemed the team played for him. Maybe a nice dose of both works best.
Posted by DmitriKaramazov
Member since Nov 2015
4467 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:27 pm to
It's a necessary but not sufficient condition for excellence. In other words, you have to be a great tactician, but that alone isn't enough. Most of the truly elite coaches today demonstrate intellectual prowess on one side of the ball or the other, sometimes both. Saban on defense, Meyer on offense, etc. If you don't have a smart coach who understands scheme and technique, you can't consistently beat other marquee teams with equivalent talent.
Posted by SEC Supreme
Virginia Beach
Member since Jan 2007
429 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:29 pm to
Having the best players is step one. From there, the argument can be made for both sides.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35253 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

How would you describe Saban when he was at LSU?
I hate pumping Saban sunshine because I can't stand him, but in reality:

I think Saban has everything really. His players respond to him. They probably worship the ground he walks on. His players are probably scared to death to fail under him (ie JK Simmons from Whiplash). He gets the best players every year. He develops them well. He's a brilliant game planner. Coordinated and organized. Willing to adapt if needed. He probably has an extreme strength and conditioning program (*wink*, *wink*). He just gets shite done.
This post was edited on 10/10/16 at 9:37 pm
Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:37 pm to
#1) recruit the best and toughest players that fit your scheme
#2) implement both offensive and defensive schemes that fit your teams abilities
#3) know how and when to turn on the emotions at critical points in the game and vs. the toughest competition...you can't be pushing the buttons constantly vs. inferior opponents...
Posted by beantown
Nashville
Member since Sep 2015
3429 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:38 pm to
Long run? Discipline, establishing a good culture. That's what breeds consistency.

Sure, being emotional might spurt a strong run during a season, but we want dynasty here.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Miles was ONLY an emotional leader, and where did that get us?




Championships?
Posted by LSUTigerDDS
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2009
844 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:48 pm to
An emotional coach with enough intellect to understand schemes so that you hire the most intellectual scheme assistant coaches that will maximize the talent that the entire coaching staff brings in through the recruiting process. And the balls to tell said assistant coaches to hit the bricks whenever they fail/become outdated.
This post was edited on 10/10/16 at 9:49 pm
Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:51 pm to
And all the above will start falling into place if we keep this in-coming class together...out OL problems will be over if the 5 committed OLmen stay with us...and if the staff stays put, I believe that the DL will be filled out nicely...QBs=check...DBs=check...the only position I'm concerned about is LBs...but I believe that Aranda can get it done...jmho
Posted by Harv1790
Member since Jul 2009
2550 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:51 pm to
Bill Belichick agrees with this.
Posted by SouthTiger504
Member since Sep 2014
1163 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Whatever Saban is doing is damn sure working.


This.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram