- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: immobile qb who can pass, or dual threat who can't pass
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:05 am to CatsGoneWild
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:05 am to CatsGoneWild
Its all about whoever can make things happen, not the style of play.
Why cant a LA. high school coach develop a QB is the better question?
Why cant a LA. high school coach develop a QB is the better question?
1
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:10 am to LSUANDY25
quote:
Why cant a LA. high school coach develop a QB is the better question?
Harris looked great in High School, in LA.
He wasn't playing in this shitastic offense though.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:23 am to CatsGoneWild
no offense....but this may be the dumbest fricking question ever asked on this board
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:27 am to Choctaw
Dual threat at LSU means hand to the running back and pitch to the running back.....
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:52 am to Datbayoubengal
quote:
So even when I make all those restrictions that remove some very noticeable QBs from this list, there has still been a great many.
I notice one glaring omission from each of their resumes
Posted on 11/22/14 at 9:47 am to DBU
OK DBU u got me. Harris' coach is the lone exception. Funny thing isnt it, when Louisiana actually produces a 4* or greater QB, he wears P&G.
Go figure. BTW,Harris played some this yr, didnt he? Got a start against the Champs. Would he had played a down in conference at the other top SEC programs?
Go figure. BTW,Harris played some this yr, didnt he? Got a start against the Champs. Would he had played a down in conference at the other top SEC programs?
This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 9:50 am
Posted on 11/22/14 at 9:48 am to LSUANDY25
quote:
Would he had played a down at the other top SEC programs?
:lol: You know how I know you are clueless?
Posted on 11/22/14 at 9:54 am to DBU
Pls tell me, DBU. btw that offense led the entire nation in 3rd down % last yr. But pls go on, this could be comical.
This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 9:56 am
Posted on 11/22/14 at 10:36 am to LSUANDY25
quote:
that offense led the entire nation in 3rd down % last yr
And what from this year's offense looks anything like last year's?
Posted on 11/22/14 at 10:53 am to DBU
quote:
And what from this year's offense looks anything like last year's?
Lets see the OC, HC, OL, TE's, FB's 2 RB's....
Funny how things change when u have poor QB play in football. Who wouldve known?
Lets try this again DBU.
Why cant the high school coaches develop a QB in this state anymore?
This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 11:02 am
Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:33 am to CatsGoneWild
quote:
a immobile white guy impresses me more than dual threats.
You could have ended it there and gotten straight to your point. You prefer immobile white QBs. Gotcha. The fact is you are not alone in this fan base. Sad but true.
And then there are the rest of us who prefer a successful QB, be he dual treat, pocket passer, black, white, brown, yellow or what the F ever. Some of us believe color has nothing to do with it. I would take Jameies Winston of Florida State without the baggage in a heartbeat. Notre Dame QB? Yes! TCU QB? Yes! Auburn's QB, Oregon's QB, Bama QB? Yes! Yes! Yes! Obviously you wouldn't because they do not fit two of your preferred characteristics. They are too fast and are not white. You probably should become a fan of BYU, you will probably be much happier with the QBs on the team you root for.
Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:43 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
Harris has a cannon on his arm and was considered a very good passer coming out. Why wouldn't you want to recruit a guy who can throw but is also mobile?
Do you really need to ask that question? He has already told you the answer. Unlike most with that insane argument, he gave that up front.
Posted on 11/22/14 at 12:05 pm to justustm2
While I agree with your premise, I would only want most of the QB's you've listed if we were to revamp the offense and spread it out.
However, with our current offensive scheme, I wouldn't mind Winston (w/o the baggage of course), Mariota, or Blake Sims.
However, with our current offensive scheme, I wouldn't mind Winston (w/o the baggage of course), Mariota, or Blake Sims.
Posted on 11/23/14 at 5:50 am to DBU
quote:
While I agree with your premise, I would only want most of the QB's you've listed if we were to revamp the offense and spread it out.
However, with our current offensive scheme, I wouldn't mind Winston (w/o the baggage of course), Mariota, or Blake Sims.
So you wouldn't want Everette Golson's 60.7% passing for 3044 yards with 27 TDs and 12 Ints?
-or-
Trevonne Boykins' 59.3% passing for 3021 yards with 24 TDs and 5 Ints?
Heck even with Nick Marshall's pedestrian passing numbers of 59.5% passing for 1688 yards with 14 TDs and 5 Ints, I'd take him and his great running ability that got Auburn to the national championship game last year. Would you not want Dak Prescott as well?
The point is the nonsense about not wanting a QB who is athletic and can run is just that, nonsense. However, as we all know it has deeper meaning for some. Just curious, what type QBs will lead their teams to the playoffs this year? Winston? Mariotta? Sims? Prescott? Boykins? J.T Barrett? All dual threats right? Who knew? What were their coaches thinking?
Posted on 11/23/14 at 7:48 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
No such thing as a "dual threat" if he can't pass.
Exactly. It's called "the wildcat" or "high school".
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News