re: I like Etling to be All SEC this year

A bit hard to imagine but hey...its Spring...Spring is a time of hope and possibility. For all but Ole Piss fans anyway.

Throwing the ball vertically over 10 yards is completely different than throwing a 1 yard screen and the back breaks it for 25 yards. Again You tried to compare Watson to Etling which is insane.
And you proved my point a better qb passing over 10 yards can win a national championship.
You know why LSU didn't beat Bama?

He could have a Heisman-caliber season and still might not win crap because the general consensus, not only within the conference and nationally, but many in his own fan base, is that he isn't any good.

He might not get any recognition he deserves because he'll start from too far behind in public opinion. Voters will be too lazy to notice unless he's phenomenal.

Of course, if he does have a year that good, his team will probably be a contender for the natty, so he could tell everyone to kiss his ***.

By your logic Leonard Fournette sucks because twice he had bad stats vs Bama. But He was an all SEC performer so I don't see your point.

Well I haven't backtracked on anything I've said I just had to correct your lying about what I said you moron. I never once compared Etling to Watson what I did was illustrate that the amount of passes you said Etling threw vs Florida over 10 yards was incorrect and he actually threw plenty of them. Yes I was incorrect about Watson but so are you he completed 14 passes over 10 yards not 19 I know you can't count but you're wrong and Etling completed 8 passes of 10 or more vs Florida not 4 like you said. I didn't click a couple drives on both games correctly and had to go back and recount it play by play for both games. Anyway you're still lying about what I said and about the stats.

Don't mind him watcher he follows me on nearly every thread to disagree with whate er I say and whoever agrees with anything i say.
(Good thing he missed my post on the rugby thread wink wink)
The second he said Watson completed 5 passes over 10 yards(i knew he didn't have a clue)...then he changed it to four(because i said 4)...when it was actually 18 by his definition. Lmaoooo, got'em

I follow you? Lmfao who posted in this thread first me or you? All you do is lie dude you're a pathological liar and it's sad. You also lied about me saying he threw 4 passes over 10 yards because I didn't ppl can read it if they want. I don't know if you know that but ppl can read all the post. You're a moron. And no Watson didn't complete 18 passes of 10 or more yards it was 14. And "my definition"? You're the only one who tried to define it, poorly I might add so you could lie more about it. Seriously the worst poster and lowest IQ of anyone on the rant by a wide margin.

Etling had 4, 5 if you want to add the screen by Guice, which I'll give you ctedit for. Next you'll be saying LSU had more than 125 yards...

You are lying again, Watson by your logic (screen passes) had 19, my logic vertically over 10 yards he had 14. You know you can actually look that up from the ssme place "you saw Etling stats"

quote:

---

And there's no difference between a screen pass and a bomb

---

Yes there is