- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Etling pressure according to Dellenger film study
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
Because I was correct and called a dumbass moron for two weeks from all the idiots on here?
I am sorry I am sticking your nose in your pile of shite you left over the last two weeks
I'm not sure what you think State kicking our arse has to do with your comment.
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 9:18 am
1
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:18 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
's not what we've done in years past. NOt sure what needs explaining here.
i thought he was saying the offense we ran saturday was the same offense we ran the 1st 2 weeks. i apologize if i misread.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:20 am to CypressTrout10
quote:
He made it look like he was pressured an extra 10 times by leaving the pocket before it actually collapsed
I've been saying this since the Bama game last year. If he feels pressure he doesn't stay in the pocket and throw anyway knowing he's going to get hit like a Tom Brady. Once he gets spooked he ducks and runs to quickly.
At times he ran into pressure that would NOT have gotten him if he'd stayed in the pocket.
That being said the entire team sucked, not just him. He didn't lose the game for us by himself, but he was/is a part of the problem.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:20 am to Rickdaddy4188
Etling skill set kinda does limit what plays we can and can not call in fairness.
I'm not blasting Etling when I say that but it is the truth.
I'm not blasting Etling when I say that but it is the truth.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:22 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Because the 1st two weeks we ran between the tackles power football, with deep play action.
I'm not sure what you think State kicking our arse has to do with your comment.
The same exact shite we did the past 5 years. And we look great because we manhandled our opponent.
I said we didnt do anything materially different besides pre-snap, and was called a buffoon
I said unless we run a different offense in SEC play, we would struggle again against teams with similar talent level. I was again called a buffoon
Well, when we played a team that could match us somewhat on talent and not get blown off the ball, we once again couldnt do shite because we have yet yo develop an in rhythm intermediate passing game that exposes the middle of the field.
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 9:25 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:26 am to lsupride87
quote:
Because the 1st two weeks we ran between the tackles power football, with deep play action.
We did other things too, unless you're calling 10-15 yards "deep."
quote:
The same exact shite we did the past 5 years.
No.
quote:
I said we didnt do anything materially different besides pre-snap, and was called a buffoon
Well, that happens when you say dumb things.
quote:
I said unless we run a different offense in SEC play, we would struggle again against teams with similar talent level. I was again called a buffoon
Well, when we played a team that could match us somewhat and talent and not get blown off the ball, we once again couldnt do shite because we have yet yo develop an in rhythm intermediate passing game that exposes the middle of the field.
The offense didn't execute at all last game. Play calling was only one piece of that puzzle. You're so worried about vindicating yourself, and I' don't really see why.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:27 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Because you were a smug little man and I like watching you squirm
The offense didn't execute at all last game. Play calling was only one piece of that puzzle. You're so worried about vindicating yourself, and I' don't really see why.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:27 am to lsupride87
quote:
Because you were a smug little man and I like watching you squirm
I'm not squirming. You were still stupid the past two weeks, and I still don't think you've been vindicated.
But here's your cookie I guess.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:29 am to LNCHBOX
quote:If the ball is in the air for 10-15 yards then yes I am not talking about that.
We did other things too, unless you're calling 10-15 yards "deep."
I want to see simply quick passing plays over the middle where the ball travels less than 10 yards, with the wr in space with room to run.
Those are plays that are easy completions that allow for big yards, all while opening up your running game
There are so many college programs that do this with ease, yet it seems impossible for LSU over the years
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:30 am to lsupride87
You can think all of that while still acknowledging we did things differently than over the last 5 years.
2 different causes can have the same effect. Doesn't mean they are the same thing.
2 different causes can have the same effect. Doesn't mean they are the same thing.
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 9:32 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:31 am to Dawgfan128
quote:
If only everyone knew HALF as much as you think you know
even people that hate me on here admit i know football.
you can disagree with someone without making personal attacks.
madking and i disagree on here about things but we dont stoop to a bitchmade level of making personal attacks.
2
quote:
Etling wasn't great but wasn't terrible.
etling played 2nbad last night. as with any position in football, him looking bad wasnt totally on him.
im a big etling fan and have defended him countless times when other poster say he sucks.
quote:
Quit acting like he was jj
JJ wasnt a horrible qb his entire career at lsu. he had a decent sophomore and senior year
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:32 am to LNCHBOX
quote:I was dead fricking on
You were still stupid the past two weeks,
quote:
The truth is we didn't do anything different last night. Pre snap was a bunch of fluff that people are pointing too.
We simply ran the ball 76% of plays(57 runs to 18 passes). 76%!! And most of them simple hand offs between the tackles Les offense would have dominated just the same Now saying that, I don't blame Canada.
We manhandled them so much why the heck would you change?
quote:
We ran the ball between the tackles up their fricking arse all night We had our tacklers and guards squeezed tight on the line It was 100% power football through their defense
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:32 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
madking a...dont stoop to a bitchmade level of making personal attacks.
False.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:33 am to lsupride87
quote:And just like I said in that thread, there is more to it than just the ratio.
We simply ran the ball 76% of plays(57 runs to 18 passes).
But again, have your cookie. Or keep going on. Your choice.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:34 am to LNCHBOX
i meant in our discussions.
i dont know what he does with other posters.
i dont know what he does with other posters.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:34 am to djrunner
quote:
The loss had nothing to do with Etling. However, I get it, If you don't know anything about football and you are looking for someone to blame...
Welcome to this board.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:37 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And just like I said in that thread, there is more to it than just the ratio.
I followed it up by saying if we run the same sets and offense from BYU, we would have the same struggle against good teams just like les. And people like you and others said I was wrong because the run looks and motion were so much different and more confusing to the defense. So I followed it up by saying if Canada runs the same offense in the SEC, the upcoming melt would be real.
Just admit, you fell for the fluff.
Canadas offense is power football. It will continue to struggle when we cant smnash it between the tackles
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:38 am to lsupride87
quote:
Just admit, you fell for the fluff.
I didn't fall for anything. I simply said I didn't agree that it was the same as the Les offense. I stand by that, and most people would agree I think.
Just because the changed offense resulted in a similar result does not make it the same offense.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:41 am to helomar84
quote:
No they don't you retard.
So what do they do?
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:So you dont agree it is majority between the tackles power football that depends heavily on having success between the tackles? That then counts on deep play action without utilizing the middle of the field passing game?
I didn't fall for anything. I simply said I didn't agree that it was the same as the Les offense. I stand by that, and most people would agree I think.
I could almost argue Canadas offense is more conservative and 1960s offense than miles actually
There are times we look like we are about to run the fricking veer with as tight as our tackles and tight ends areThis post was edited on 9/18/17 at 9:43 am
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News