- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/23/12 at 9:17 pm to Cajun Tide
It's all about PR and money.
The Pac-10 -- soon to officially become the Pac-12 -- has agreed to a 12-year television contract with ESPN and Fox that will more than triple its media rights fees and be the most valuable for any conference in college sports.
The contract, which will begin with the 2012-13 season, will be worth more than $225 million per year -- or $2.7 billion over the life of the deal, Sports Business Daily and The Associated Press reported on Tuesday.
The Pac-10 -- soon to officially become the Pac-12 -- has agreed to a 12-year television contract with ESPN and Fox that will more than triple its media rights fees and be the most valuable for any conference in college sports.
The contract, which will begin with the 2012-13 season, will be worth more than $225 million per year -- or $2.7 billion over the life of the deal, Sports Business Daily and The Associated Press reported on Tuesday.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 9:31 pm to km
quote:
It's all about PR and money.
yeah, it can't be because someone thinks Oregon is a good team or anything. How can they think that a team that went 12-1 to the BCS CG 2 years ago and 12-2 last year is good?
quote:
The Pac-10 -- soon to officially become the Pac-12
By soon do you mean last year?
Posted on 5/23/12 at 9:37 pm to bisonduck
quote:
What SEC oline? The oline for LSU last year was probably the 4th best oline we saw. I would rank the units in the following order: Wisconsin, USC, Stanford and LSU.
You lost to SC by 3, LSU by 13 (including a late garbage TD for you), yet SC's line was better than ours?
This post was edited on 5/23/12 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 5/23/12 at 9:39 pm to bisonduck
Keep telling yourself that. 
This post was edited on 5/23/12 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 5/23/12 at 9:43 pm to Cajun Tide
Amazing seeing how no games have been played yet 
Posted on 5/23/12 at 9:44 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
I sure hope so. Another 13-1 year isn't going to cut it.
Posted on 5/24/12 at 12:57 am to Thunder Tiger
quote:You're not making an effective argument by throwing up score differentials. USC's O-line gelled last season around Kalil and Holmes. Stanford's O-line was beastly, and so was Wiscy's.
You lost to SC by 3, LSU by 13 (including a late garbage TD for you), yet SC's line was better than ours?
LSU's scoreline was 10 pts. better than USC's because our D was worn out at the end, and LSU had great special teams and defense. The O line for SC giving Barkley the time he needed to find Woods and Lee was probably much more critical in slicing through Oregon's secondary than LSU's was.
Posted on 5/24/12 at 1:42 am to Thunder Tiger
Yeah, their oline waa better.
Posted on 5/24/12 at 1:49 am to loweralabamatrojan
this
Page 4 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News