- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do we see Randell or Bolden this week?
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:40 pm to jonanthans
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:40 pm to jonanthans
quote:
Broski = Warren Moon
Close, Michael Wilbon.
0
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:40 pm to Broski
quote:
The point is that the difference is negligible at best and the OP is a racist idiot for thinking that Bolden would magically be averaging 5 yards a pop running the option.
Right...three tenths of a second is negligible.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:41 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Dude Mett isn't exactly lighting it up.
He's got a better completion % than Bolden.
quote:
Would you put Randall in for a particular package?
No. He's never played a down of college football yet. Putting him in against the #1 team in the country for his first snap, not even a starting snap, just a series or even a down, isn't a very smart idea.
If you want to use someone like that that has played and is on our team, I'd use Shepard.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:41 pm to Wazoo
Would you put Randall in for a particular package?
Do you honestly think that's its a good idea or even being remotely considered to bring in the third string QB that hasn't ever taken a snap against Bama?
If you think this is a good idea at all then you are a fool.
Do you honestly think that's its a good idea or even being remotely considered to bring in the third string QB that hasn't ever taken a snap against Bama?
If you think this is a good idea at all then you are a fool.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:41 pm to Broski
quote:
The only "facts" you were going off of was that one guys is white and the other is black, therefore black guy is a runner and whitie is not.
When talking about Mett's speed, think that fact is enough...
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:42 pm to PurpleAndGold86
RS would make a ton more sense
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:43 pm to la_birdman
[quote]If you want to use someone like that that has played and is on our team, I'd use Shepard.[/quote
I wouldn't be opposed to this. If we are just going to run the ball inside the 5 anyway we might as well have another option.
I wouldn't be opposed to this. If we are just going to run the ball inside the 5 anyway we might as well have another option.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:43 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Right...three tenths of a second is negligible.
Considering they are both guys whose tendencies are to stay in the pocket as long as possible, yes, negligible.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:43 pm to Broski
Do people not realize that we have been using Ware for a couple plays under center the past 2 weeks???
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:44 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
When talking about Mett's speed, think that fact is enough...
Why are you so hung up on having a running QB when we've got a huge stable of running backs, all who have different running styles?
Why is it so important to have a mobile QB?
This post was edited on 10/27/12 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:44 pm to Broski
quote:
Considering they are both guys whose tendencies are to stay in the pocket as long as possible, yes, negligible.
Were we talking about tendencies or athleticism?
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:45 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Were we talking about tendencies or athleticism?
I thought we are talking about having a QB who can run, neither can nor want to.
This post was edited on 10/27/12 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:45 pm to la_birdman
quote:
Why does is it so important to have a mobile QB?
Because picking up 3rd downs with your legs when nothing else is open is huge against bama where field position is everything.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:47 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Because picking up 3rd downs with your legs when nothing else is open is huge against bama where field position is everything.
So every third down, we should take Mettenberger out? Yeah, opposing defenses won't know what's coming next.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:47 pm to Broski
quote:
I thought we are talking about having a QB who can run, neither can nor want to.
Emphasis on can. I posted facts that showed one can better than the other. You posted an opinion on whether he wants to or not.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:47 pm to Wazoo
Yeah let's pay Bolden, especially since he had so much success against BAMA the last 2 years
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:48 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Because picking up 3rd downs with your legs when nothing else is open is huge against bama where field position is everything.
And yet you want to have:
A. A guy that isn't a runner and not a very good passer out there
or
B. You want a third string guy that's never played a down of college football in his life to come in for a down against Bama "where field position is everything."
You really haven't thought all this through.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:48 pm to la_birdman
quote:
Why is it so important to have a mobile QB?
1. We struggle in the red zone
2. A mobile QB gives more options in said situation
3. We struggle in the red zone
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:48 pm to Broski
quote:
So every third down, we should take Mettenberger out? Yeah, opposing defenses won't know what's coming next.
I didn't say that. However, we were very successful last year rolling out of the pocket on 3rd down with a run throw option.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:49 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Emphasis on can. I posted facts that showed one can better than the other. You posted an opinion on whether he wants to or not.
So 40 times outweigh actual college state???
Is 3 tenths of a second really worth giving up an resemblance of a passing game?
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News