Started By
Message
locked post

Do we see Randell or Bolden this week?

Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:06 pm
(no message)
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56271 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:08 pm to
Nope
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:09 pm to
I'm afraid that we don't as well. I think mixing it up could help against bama.
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
29945 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:10 pm to
I honestly think bolden is redshirting
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70738 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:11 pm to
Bolden is a pure pocket passer, why did you lump him in with Randall and not include Rivers?
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:11 pm to
How many years of eligibility does he have left? 2?
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:12 pm to
He's more athletic than rivers. Mett and rivers can't run for shite.
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
29945 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:12 pm to
Yes
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70738 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

He's more athletic than rivers. Mett and rivers can't run for shite.


based on?
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:15 pm to
Watching him at penn state and watching rivers in the spring game.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70738 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:16 pm to
Just admit that you thought Bolden was an option QB because he is black.
Posted by la_birdman
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31001 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:17 pm to
Bolden can't run either, FYI.
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:17 pm to
Just admit that bolden is more athletic than rivers and Mett.
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:18 pm to
Why when neither one of them has gotten close to the field would you want to see them in the biggest game of the year against the be defense in the country? Why?


WHY?!?
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70738 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Just admit that bolden is more athletic than rivers and Mett.


I would say they are about equal. I think in a footrace between the three, Mettenberger barely wins. You obviously didn't watch Bolden at PSU if you think he can run.
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

Message Posted by la_birdman Bolden can't run either, FYI.


He's a better runner than Mett, and since I don't know how good of a passer randel is I figure he could bring an added dimension in certain packages.

It's just frustrating because our passing game hasn't looked much better than last year, and we've missed the opportunity to pick up crucial 3rd downs with a scramble.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70738 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

He's a better runner than Mett





No he is not.
Posted by Wazoo
Member since Oct 2012
944 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:24 pm to
I think they should have seen the field in earlier games. It obviously depends on how the game goes, but if Mett can't hit passes, I don't see why you wouldn't want a running option in there.
Posted by carolinagirl6
Atlanta , GA
Member since Nov 2011
123 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:24 pm to
Neither
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70738 posts
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

I don't see why you wouldn't want a running option in there.


A running option would be Randall, not Bolden. It's a joke that you even thought that.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram