Started By
Message

Dandy Don had an interesting stat today.

Posted on 7/7/15 at 8:47 am
Posted by dos crystal
Georgia
Member since Aug 2008
4720 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 8:47 am
Last years team had 71 penalties. However the 2007 team (n.c. team) had 83 and the 2003 (n.c. team) had 102.

1) I think it shows more or less penalties doesn't affect winning.

2) Many have debated the penalties demonstrate a lack of discipline by the coach. I think this stat show's it doesn't really matter who the coach was/is as for as penalties are concerned.

3) I find it interesting that the prior coach has had less penalties every year at his current university than at lsu. I think it supports the theory that his current university receives the benefit of friendly officiating. same coach, just different schools.

Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48940 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 8:50 am to
It really all depends on the timing and severity of the penalty



A Rahem Alem punt on a 3rd down stop that gives Arky a 1st down sucks

A false start on 3rd and 1 sucks
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10047 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 8:53 am to
Agree with what you are saying. Think it says more that the entire season is a crapshoot anyway. If we didn't have one penalty in a crucial moment of the biggest game of the season, we had a great chance of going 10-3 or 11-2. (Ark would have seen a more hyped team and better bowl with different opponent could have gone either way.)
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
9801 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 8:57 am to
quote:

) I think it shows more or less penalties doesn't affect winning.

Its when the penalty occurs.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:03 am to
Offense probably couldn't sustain enough drives, and the defense was too busy having the ball driven down their throats for the offense to get as many penalties.

During one of those championship season, the team had a disproportionately high number of penalties against two jv opponents.
Posted by dos crystal
Georgia
Member since Aug 2008
4720 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:20 am to
quote:

If we didn't have one penalty in a crucial moment of the biggest game of the season, we had a great chance of going 10-3 or 11-2.


I get that. However, when you look at THAT PENALTY. It can and should be argued, why was it thrown on Vadal only? It equally could have been thrown on the Alabama guy who actually started it. The proper call would have been to either keep the flag in the pocket or flag both parties. So, it really wasn't one coaches player showing more discipline than the other coaches player. It was a Ref's decision to single out one behavior and not the other.

The flip of this is when LSU was flagged for trying to block a fg, which was missed by Au, and getting a redo for the only time that call was made that year to win the game. The ref chose that time to call the penalty rather than the coaches discipline/teaching of the player.
This post was edited on 7/7/15 at 9:23 am
Posted by TDTGodfather
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6169 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:24 am to
not that i disagree with anything the OP said but would be interested in % over number. as in i wonder what the total play number averages are for teams now and how they compare to the average number of plays in a game in 2007. also 2007 played an extra game vs last yr's team.
Posted by Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
13493 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:34 am to
More aggressive defenses and/or team will incur more penalties.
Posted by ColeCoushCoush
Member since Aug 2014
497 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:47 am to
I know the NFL isn't always directly comparable to NCAA, but the Seahawks had the most penalties in the NFL the last two years, and they made the super bowl both times and won it once.

It's probably necessary to look at the specific types of penalties to get a fuller picture. A team having a ton of false start penalties might really be an indicator of lack of discipline. But if a team gets called for pass interference a lot, that might be a sign of bad a defense that can't defend cleanly, or it might be the sign of a good aggressive defense that can cover well, create lots of turnovers, and is willing to accept a few extra penalties as a necessary consequence of that style of defense.
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:49 am to
quote:

A Rahem Alem punt on a 3rd down stop that gives Arky a 1st down sucks
Forgot about him.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
22171 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 9:55 am to
More penalties = more aggressive play
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 10:00 am to
quote:

3) I find it interesting that the prior coach has had less penalties every year at his current university than at lsu. I think it supports the theory that his current university receives the benefit of friendly officiating. same coach, just different schools.


I ran the numbers once...while at LSU, Nick Saban's teams where more penalized than BAMA's every season. Once at BAMA, Saban's new teams were still penalized less than LSU to an almost exact amount.

Nothing to do with the coach...just the colors it seems. Just part and parcel of doing business in the SEC, I'm afraid...
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16341 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I find it interesting that the prior coach has had less penalties every year at his current university than at lsu. I think it supports the theory that his current university receives the benefit of friendly officiating. same coach, just different schools.


Took words right out from my speaker system.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11294 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 10:06 am to
Penalties give the drooling morons a talking point to bitch about the Coach running an undisciplined team.
Posted by Minnesota Tiger
Member since Oct 2005
4414 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 10:11 am to
I recall when FSU won it all in 94, they were the most penalized team. I look at it as correlated with agressiveness. 2003 was a blitz happy agressive defense. Off sides and late hits gonna happen.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4776 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Dandy Don


You mean Subpar Scott?

I know, I know, he's okay. I just miss the old man!
Posted by oreeg
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
5280 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 1:45 pm to
I remember the 07 team had a horrible time learning how to line up correctly. Seems like we had 2 of those every game including one in the Arky game that took away a TD I believe.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
13966 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 2:06 pm to
When you're making up that penalties with solid QB play getting chunks of big yardage at a time you can be fine.


When you can't complete 65% of your passes you're going to struggle.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11161 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 2:20 pm to
Im suprised the 2007 team was so low. They always struck me as very undisciplined.

There are 2 types of penalties though:
aggressive penalties like pass interference, and then there are stupid penalties like false starts, delay of game, unsportsmanlike conduct.

I think stats of those 2 types would be more telling.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 2:43 pm to
A 15 yard penalty for a soccer style fig flop on the goal line with the game in hand hurts bad.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram