23 touchdown passes thrown in two seasons.

if LSU was undefeated, would it still be unacceptable?

just wondering

But they are not undefeated. You know what they say about ifs and buts.

quote:

---

But they are not undefeated.

---

no shite

can you answer the question though?

It's tough to answer that question because everybody knows it's almost impossible to go undefeated in two seasons when you are that ineffective at throwing the football.

Passing offenses are all the rage right now.

Of course it would be dude but they are not. Not even close. If they could go undefeated by running it up the middle every play of every game I wouldn't care. That is not going to happen though, you have to be able to pass.

But you did just have a rb tie the school record for tds. You got to give a little somewhere.

Last year sucked, I'm not denying that.

quote:

---

That my friends is unacceptable at this level of football. Its embarrassing, no other way to spin it.

---

I see the point you are trying to make, but what if, hypothetically, our tailbacks had 60 touchdowns during that same time-span?

During LSU's most prolific passing season, 2001, Rohan Davey only threw for 21 touchdowns while Toefield and Davis combined for 28 touchdowns.

I understand that 23 touchdowns in 24 games versus 21 touchdowns in 13 games is not the same, but keep in mind that Davey and Mauck had 461 pass attempts to Harris and Jennings' 526...nevermind. On second thought, that shite is pretty pathetic.

quote:

---

Of course it would be dude

---

thanks

quote:

---

23 touchdown passes thrown in two seasons

---

Ouch.
I looked up Navy to compare.
They threw for 6 less touchdowns in those two years, but on about ONLY 40 percent of the passing attempts.
They averaged a touchdown every 13.75 passes, whereas we averaged one every 20 passes.

Yes.