Started By
Message

re: 1989 Football revisited

Posted on 7/28/16 at 4:53 pm to
Posted by TheDeathValley
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2010
17161 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

look how many games we lost by 2 scores or less.


Big difference between two scores and two points...

Two scores is anywhere from 6-14pts...
Posted by jonboy
Member since Sep 2003
7138 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

clamdip


Remember the Sports Illustrated article,"Out of Their League" chronicling LSU's decline under Archer but maybe came out Curly's first season?
I remember it describing a country club atmosphere with physically inferior players under Archer. Hence the, "put your earrings in a box" crap by Curly. From what I remember LSU went from country club under Archer to "Khmer Rouge" under Hallman.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31902 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:25 pm to
Archers classes were highly recruited. The 1989 class which included Mawae was ranked 4th in the nation. Recruiting was not the issue.

Did he draw snake eyes on some? Sure. But he was successful at pulling what was considered blue chip talent......that talent just had a glass jaw.
This post was edited on 7/28/16 at 5:30 pm
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24334 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 7:43 pm to
fricking Arnsbarger screwed us because of him recommending Archer knowing he was going to get he UF job and was going to fire Hall and hire Spurrier.

Archer didn't adjust to the prop 48 issues like other SEC coaches specifically Spurrier and Dooley to a lesser extent.Bama and Auburn cheated so bad during those years I pretty much exclude anything they did including the 1992 Bama team. The NCAA caught them and should have stripped that team of the title but the tenicality was proving the issue happened in 1992. I'm old and don't remember the details from all of that mess.

Curley staying at Southern Miss would have been the best thing for him and LSU. He won there including beating Bama twice in 4 years. Go look at their schedule and you will see that they played a lot of SEC schools sometimes 2 (and maybe 3?) a year so he beat SEC schools.
Our players were out of control academically and off the field during Archers tenure. That's why they wanted a disciplinarian. The problem was those players on the team that were there when he arrived, we're not committed to follow the process after Archer gave them free reigns at the school. There was ZERO accountability and respect with Archer. So when Hallman arrived he was fighting a culture that DGAF.

His Southern Miss team was loaded. Personally know players that started for him during Favres time and beyond and all states that the LSU job was too big for him. Meaning he had control of his recruits and they listened to him. That's a fact directly from his former players that I know personally.
This post was edited on 7/28/16 at 7:46 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67923 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 7:45 pm to
the beginning of the dreaded 90s
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26178 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 8:07 pm to
They weren't a bad team. That team got off on the wrong foot, then suffered a number of key injuries, and just never jelled into a cohesive unit.

Much like the 1998 team, but even more disappointing.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20446 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

man people are stupid about things

I agree, like claiming that prop 48 was the MAIN thing that caused the decline for LSU in the 90's.

Instead of acting like an a-hole to people on here when we're just having an innocent conversation, you should keep to yourself. Because all "that you know" is kind of stupid.
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 8:38 pm to
Please tell me you don't really believe Arnsparger took the Florida AD job and then would wait three seasons to run Galen Hall off and then hire Spurrier as some master plan?

Some of you live in Fantasy Land.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24334 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

1989 Football revisited
Please tell me you don't really believe Arnsparger took the Florida AD job and then would wait three seasons to run Galen Hall off and then hire Spurrier as some master plan?

Some of you live in Fantasy Land.



I was there in school 1983-1988. You are in fantasy land of you don't believe that Arnsbarger recommended Archer even though Spurrier was available.
It blew up on the media like shite when he did what he did.
That is exactly why many many fans and local media blasted his arse and hated him until he passed for that shite of recommending Archer.
Know your fricking hosiery!
Posted by Malaysian Tiger
Manila
Member since May 2008
4732 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 9:18 pm to
Tom Hodson had his best year and was 1st Team All SEC for the 4th time. Difficult to believe a QB can be this good and the record is 4-7.

Tom Hodson 1989 LSU 11 Games
183/317 57.7%
2,655 Yards 8.4 Yds Per Pass
22 TD's 12 Int's 143.4 Rating
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 9:41 pm to
You are crazy.You honestly think that in 1986 when Alabama,Southern California and Texas all passed over Spurrier,LSU not only didn't hire Spurrier---who had never been a college HC,but they were tricked by Arnsparger? Ol' Bill knew in three years he'd run off Galen Hall and hire Spurrier?

True lunacy.Arnsparger had to be drug kicking and screaming into hiring Spurrier.He wanted Gary Darnell to be full head coach.He didn't have some secret three year plan to sabotage LSU.

Amazing.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 9:59 pm to
Think we started season with the nation's #1 ranked special teams and then A&M proceeded to return the opening kickoff for a TD. Downhill from there
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24334 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 10:01 pm to
Steve Spurrier was a a fantastic OC and Archer was the DC at LSU. Wait. Who was REALLY the DC? The DC for the freaking 72 dolphins FROM MIAMI SPURRIER'S HOME TOWN. Who was a fantastic OC at Duke? the HC for the USFL Tampa Bay Bandits until 85 when they folded? He had MORE EXPERIENCE AND WAS. Proven winner. Archer had done absolutely NOTHING. Spurrier was the hottest coach when that happened. What exactly happened in 85/86 when Arnsbarger who was OUR REIGNING HC, interviewed in the middle of the season for the UF AD job. In the mean time Spurrier was available to hire, but wasn't going to wait around for the Arnsbarger move to UF so he signed that deal with Duke as their HC. UF had that deal with Hall. There was a shite ton of issues and not just the normal conspiracy theory crap with a whole bunch of proof to substantiate it.

The students had a whole bunch of choice words for him as his sorry arse was packing for UF.
All I cat is Miami of fricking Ohio!
This post was edited on 7/28/16 at 10:18 pm
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31902 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 6:36 am to
As an example, Karl Dunbar injured his foot early in the season and couldn't even practice much of the time. He was getting injections on game day to even see the field.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27519 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 12:23 pm to
There is more to the Archer story than you guys let on and it had everything to do with tBOS and Bob Broadhead.

Broadhead was canned in November of 1986 and left a void when it came to leadership inside of the Athletic Department and then later on in 1986 Arnsparger announced he was resigning to become AD at FL. This put everything into a tailspin. There were two factions on the Board at the time. One wanted to bring in someone from the outside. This bunch actually was willing to go with Spurrier and had an offer to present to him. en things started to fall apart.....the team got involved and basically said that they would not play for anyone but Archer and that some were more than willing to transfer. Archer was well liked particularly on the defense and the defense was stacked going into the 1987 season even with the departures of Michael Brooks and Roland Barbay, et al

The Board decided that the upside to Archer was greater than the downside although there were some like Cusimano who had their reservations but the y figured that with the amassed talent from the Arnsparger and even Stovall years that they could weather it and Archer could grow into the role . Actually for the first two years Archer seemed to be a very good pick. LSU finished Top 5 after the 1987 season and won a share of the SEC in 1988.
This post was edited on 7/29/16 at 12:31 pm
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10233 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 12:29 pm to
This is the correct version of history for the era. Archer could not lead the talent the brought in. He was in way over his head.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27519 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 12:55 pm to
I know it to be fact because I worked at the time for a Board member and was there as the decisions were being made. There was a lot of politics being played at the time inside of LSU...the Board could not care less about the NCAA eavesdropping, but there were some on the board who were really pissed that he had such a cozy relationship with Doug Manship of the Advocate . This person DID NOT want Broadhead to resign, but he was in the minority. He especially did not want Braodhead resigning before Christmas.....the Chancellor, Jim Wharton was in the camp that wanted Broadhead gone and forced him out over the Manship stuff.

Arnsparger saw the level of politics at LSU and wanted no part of it and jumped at the Florida gig.
This post was edited on 7/29/16 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39582 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

What the hell happened? Preseason Top 10. Did we lose a lot of players from 88??



quote:

November 4 at Ole Miss W 35–30



Don't care, beat Ole Miss.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27519 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Don't care, beat Ole Miss


Possibly true, but Archer was still retained for the 90 season, but by that time he had lost control of the team.
Posted by Malaysian Tiger
Manila
Member since May 2008
4732 posts
Posted on 7/29/16 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

This is the correct version of history for the era. Archer could not lead the talent the brought in. He was in way over his head.


At the time I knew a number of the players and this is what I was told. When Arnsparger was the Coach no player would talk to him because they were afraid of him. They would go to Archer and then Archer would go to Arnsparger. Archer had a great relationship with the players and they really liked him. Some of them actually called Archer "Mike" and not Coach. When Archer became the Coach he could not be a Coach because he was too close to the players. Some started taking advantage of the situation and this led to a problem on the team. Archer is a good coach and DC but did not have the abilities to be a HC at the time.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram