Started By
Message
locked post

Why would Lache

Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:41 am
Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:41 am
pick LSU over Auburn given how the season is playing out for both teams offensively? Good majority of LSU fans were counting on Auburn falling apart once the season got going, but instead you have LSU rushing for 30 yards vs the same team AU put 400 on.
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24520 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:42 am to
Because LSU can sell Lache on immediate playing time and not be full of shite this time. We'll need all the RB we can get our hands on next year.
Posted by Brown Mountain
Covington, La
Member since Feb 2006
8014 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:45 am to
quote:

We'll need all the RB we can get our hands on next year.


Ridley, Murphy, Ford and Calhoun won't cut it?
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24520 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:47 am to
None of them have real experience so having a ton of talent certainly won't hurt.


eta: Although I'm not sure Les has figured out in five years that you have to put the most talented players on the field.
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 8:49 am
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Why would Lache pick LSU over Auburn


The same reason he was thinking about going to AU when everyone said they were going to suck.
Posted by msukb79
South Mississippi
Member since May 2009
10112 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Because LSU can sell Lache on immediate playing time


This
Posted by Luke4LSU
Member since Oct 2007
11986 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Why would Lache
pick LSU over Auburn given how the season is playing out for both teams offensively?


I don't know.

Why would Fre'Shad Hunter pick NC State over LSU, when LSU offers a dire need for D-linemen, plays in a better league, and has a better shot at a championship?

Answer: Who knows? They're kids, and I don't care how many insiders you think you know, you'll never get inside these kids' minds and understand their thought process.

FWIW, I'm about 50/50 on whether he goes LSU or Auburn, and I don't think he knows at this point.
Posted by rocket32484
Member since Jan 2008
1393 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Because LSU can sell Lache on immediate playing time


quote:

This


If you think Auburn isn't using this as well, youre sorely mistaken.
Posted by b rod lsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
4881 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Why would Lache pick LSU over Auburn



Pretty obvious, actually.

Majority of Auburn's touches to this point come from 1 senior (Tate) and a host of underclassmen (McCalebb - Fr, Smith - So, Fannin - Jr). Those 3 guys are going to carry the load for Auburn next season. You also throw into the mix the fact that they have a commitment from Dyer and it starts to get crowded.

The only running backs with significant touches for LSU this season have been 3 seniors - Scott, Williams, Holliday. He comes here next season and competes with guys like Murphy, Ridley and Ford who haven't proven anything to this point. LSU is going to give considerable playing time to a couple of inexperienced backs next season either way, just as soon be Lache.
Posted by Big Fat
"Fear the Hat" returns 2010
Member since Sep 2009
5404 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Ridley, Murphy, Ford and Calhoun won't cut it?
Ford will, the others wont IMO.
Posted by Jhag
varying
Member since Mar 2009
4342 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:16 am to
We can offer him playing time just as well as lsu can, Tate leaving....he can come in and be the 1 or 2 no doubt
Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:19 am to
Auburn can produce offensively on offense while LSU is completely inept running the ball. Depth chart hasn't been mentioned much by LS that I recall. Why would a high profile offensive player choose LSU w/ the inability (both in production and play calling) they've shown this year?
Posted by Big Fat
"Fear the Hat" returns 2010
Member since Sep 2009
5404 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Auburn can produce offensively on offense while LSU is completely inept running the ball. Depth chart hasn't been mentioned much by LS that I recall. Why would a high profile offensive player choose LSU w/ the inability (both in production and play calling) they've shown this year?
I hate to admit it, but if Im a high profile RB why do I want to run up the middle all game into a stacked line, behind an OL that has no surge?
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Auburn can produce offensively on offense while LSU is completely inept running the ball. Depth chart hasn't been mentioned much by LS that I recall. Why would a high profile offensive player choose LSU w/ the inability (both in production and play calling) they've shown this year?


I'm not sure if your playing devils advocate but I see what your saying. I have seen crowton effictively use talent on offense yet this year and we are way too predictible.
Posted by outsideroach
Yaw Fricked Baw
Member since Nov 2005
8015 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:24 am to
The only reason is because he grew up likeing LSU. If I was LS I would pay close attention to RR and RS this season, and if thier roles dont increase as the season goes on, I would go nowhere near LSU. LSUs depth chart might be favorable compared to AU, but AU will play the youngsters, while Miles will make excuses to keep the upperclassman: Ridley,Calhoun,Ford, Murphy in the game while a more talented LS sits the bench.

Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:25 am to
not playing devils advocate, being honest. this offense is incompetent, and is incapable of recognizing it's best play maker b/c he's a frosh; not to mention Randle being a complete non-factor.
Posted by b rod lsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
4881 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:26 am to
quote:

he can come in and be the 1 or 2 no doubt


So who's carries does he take?

McCalebb is averaging almost 7 yds per carry as a freshman. If he holds pace and has a 900 - 1000 yard season with 8 - 10 touchdowns, you really think he doesn't get the majority of the carries next season?

What about Fannin? He's rolling out 7.5 yards per touch himself and will be a senior next season.

What about Dyer? Lache going to come in and automatically play over him given Mahlzan's prior relationship recruiting Dyer when he was at Arkansas?
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31945 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:28 am to
Clearly the problem is with coaching. Once Studrawa is fired and a better offensive line coach is brought in, the players on the offensive line will be better managed and the team will actually be able to block for the running backs.

It seems clear to me that there are at least 2 players on the line (at guard) who just don't cut it. I have no idea why players like Shaw haven't been switched to the interior, instead of gathering splinters on the bench as the back-up left tackle who never plays.

With Hardrick coming in January and Faulk adjusting to college this year, it's not as if the team has no one. In fact, on paper, the O-line talent is decent even with the attrition. There's just something missing from the unit because linemen are getting pushed back like tackling dummies .

Besides, Lache has to be excited for the opportunity to play with Shep.
Posted by amiznit
Missouri City
Member since Apr 2005
1850 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Why would Lache pick LSU over Auburn given how the season is playing out for both teams offensively? Good majority of LSU fans were counting on Auburn falling apart once the season got going, but instead you have LSU rushing for 30 yards vs the same team AU put 400 on.

Based on evidence thus far:
1) AU is better offensively, both running and passing.
2) AU is playing freshmen while LSU is not.
3) AU is winning "pretty" and LSU is not.
Posted by Jhag
varying
Member since Mar 2009
4342 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 9:30 am to
McCalebb and Lache would split and Fannin is a utility H back, he's no really a RB only in special formations, if Dyer is tere as well which I don't think we land Dyer and Lache, then it's a cluster frick and idk
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram