Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Feist and Gordon fall to 3-stars on rivals update?

Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:55 pm
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68349 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:55 pm
Wow, the hits just keep on coming

I see none of our commits got bumped up.

Did they give an explanation as to why?
This post was edited on 1/19/12 at 9:59 pm
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93727 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:56 pm to
All the while Alabama gets 3-4 néw 4*
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68349 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

All the while Alabama gets 3-4 néw 4*


Already processed 2 guys (3-stars of course) to get back down to 25
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127424 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:07 pm to
Posted by jdg91878
Do overs+Opinion poll politics =MNC
Member since Oct 2010
3742 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:08 pm to
Rivals is approaching espn on recruiting.

Scout and 247 >>>>>>>>> Rivals
Posted by gotygers
west St.Tammany
Member since Sep 2007
3016 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:09 pm to
This looks intentional, why do they keep downgrading our recruits?
Posted by ItsThatDude12
Giving out Mercy Knees
Member since Apr 2009
9927 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:09 pm to
Feist and Gordon aren't going to be as good now that rivals has taken away a star OMG : (


The program is in shambles.
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28726 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:10 pm to
fwiw they were both overrated.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
12391 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:18 pm to
Didn't say a thing about Gordon.

For Fiest, the hack Perroni said he's a guy without a position because he's only played DE in hs and struggled at UA at LB. Also said he disappeared in the Dome. Basically for no reason.

We had 2 guys drop from the 250 to 3* players on there. Just more reason and evidence in my argument that Rivals is a sham of it's old self. Haven't taken them serious since the funding problems started and people started bolting. Their rankings are 90% based on camps,combines,7 on 7, all star games and politics. The fact that they'll outright deny this and will say that the entire body of work means more is not evident from their actions. If Fiest was a 4* and top 250 player based on his body of work all year but a 3* based on 1 all star week where he was playing LB for the 1st time and actually impressed most people then their explanations of how the rankings work is just a flat out lie. That's just an example of 1 of our commits. There are many more.

Avery Johnson was rightly dropped but the question is why now and not earlier? He had a bad year before now. It is purely based on the all star game but they deny that. He is now ranked 247 after previously being 75. If his true ranking was that different then why wait until the final ranking to drop the kid 172 spots? Their actions don't support their explanation and reasoning.
Posted by stho381
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4628 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:20 pm to
Don't care about the stars.....if they lose or gain a star doesn't change the player or what they bring to the table. Consider it a preseason ranking 3 years too early.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Whatever site(s) has us ranked higher >>>>>>>>> whatever site(s) have us ranked lower


fify
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:51 pm to
Feist dropping just proves how much a joke rivals is now.
Posted by ffishstik
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
4129 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 11:10 pm to
They can drop them all to 2* for all I care. Same players, we know they're good, and outside of Oxford and Alabama, they don't hang banners for "recruiting national championships".

Heck, maybe other schools would stop trying to take sway our commits if they were ranked lower.

Oh, and frick all teams who wear red.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 12:13 am to
What difference does it make if the LSU coaching staff wanted them? Ronnie Feist's performance in the Under Armor All Star game was better than several other players who are rated much higher. I was more impressed with Feist in the game than Landon Collins.
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16341 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 4:48 am to
These ratings I would bet is used by these teams to close out their recruiting. You can see a recruit who is trying to make up his mind may do so if he thinks he'll be among the best class. The only one in 1st place every year is Bama and texas. Now I see that Duval from Bama is still a 4*. Did he play in any all star games? Skewing the rankings is favor of your favorite team is all Rivals is doing.
Posted by Nastycuts22
Tampa, FL
Member since Jan 2010
154 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 6:24 am to
who cares , when they play on Saturday I don't any stars next to their name . It's all nonsense anyway .
Posted by Random LSU Hero
2014 NFL Survivor Champion (17-0)
Member since Aug 2011
9434 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 6:32 am to
quote:

Feist and Gordon fall to 3-stars on rivals update



quote:

All the while Alabama gets 3-4 néw 4*




Who gives a frick about stars? We know they're studs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram