- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:38 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
No offense to anyone, but the chances of any of yall getting elected to be an admin are pretty much 0.
Don't the team boards have "admins" that keep them cleaned up, basically someone whose RAs get addressed quickly and can issue warnings before that? We're not talking banning, post killing, thread anchoring Demi-god powers here. What's needed is admin attention, one way or the other.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:38 am to dreaux
quote:
Recruiting board admin
I support this post
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:48 am to dreaux
dreaux gets my vote 
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:48 am to Suntiger
6th page 
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:51 am to Suntiger
Supported.
Chinese58, GeauxAggie, Brewhan etc are my vote.
Not Memphis, we need him to be on the edge of Banland.
I miss LSUfanva, too.
Chinese58, GeauxAggie, Brewhan etc are my vote.
Not Memphis, we need him to be on the edge of Banland.
I miss LSUfanva, too.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:53 am to Linkovich
quote:
As long as the personal attacks of recruits are minimized, I would be happy.
I'd personally be happy with keeping the Bamasessed posters' privileges to a bare minimum, or the people that question our coaching staff's judgment in recruiting lesser-known players (aka the star gazers).
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:54 am to dreaux
I support this idea...
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:54 am to brewhan davey
I support this message
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:57 am to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
We're not talking banning, post killing, thread anchoring Demi-god powers here. What's needed is admin attention, one way or the other.
There's the rub. There has to be a middle of the road type of guy that can do it. Rummy would be the best but has lots of duties on here. And yes, I said duties.
I was going to submit ProjectP but he is too anti non-LSU posters, IMO. Otherwise, he would be perfect.
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 11:59 am
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:58 am to geauxranger54
I also think that in addition to having an admin for the board, a possible amendment to the rules should be made:
a poster should have X (amount can be determined by important people) amount of posts on the recruiting board before being allowed the ability to start threads..
That would keep shitty, redundant threads from being started DAILY..
a poster should have X (amount can be determined by important people) amount of posts on the recruiting board before being allowed the ability to start threads..
That would keep shitty, redundant threads from being started DAILY..
Posted on 7/30/13 at 11:59 am to SCRATCH MY GOAT
quote:
a poster should have X (amount can be determined by important people) amount of posts on the recruiting board before being allowed the ability to start threads.
The RB would have missed out on some of the best threads ever by having the quota.
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:00 pm to Linkovich
Did you mean best threads ever??
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:02 pm to SCRATCH MY GOAT
yeah, sorry.Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:04 pm to dreaux
i approve this message
Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:05 pm to Linkovich
All I'm saying is that we always have those new guys who, in a weekly basis, start the same threads over and over
'Who do y'all think we will end up with'
'Why don't we have any commits yet?'
'Is this the best class EVER?'
'I have a good feeling about this group'
I just think that by having a quota, people will already know what's been talked about repeatedly, and we won't have to see the same threads over and over
'Who do y'all think we will end up with'
'Why don't we have any commits yet?'
'Is this the best class EVER?'
'I have a good feeling about this group'
I just think that by having a quota, people will already know what's been talked about repeatedly, and we won't have to see the same threads over and over
Posted on 7/30/13 at 12:11 pm to dreaux
I support it, 100%
Posted on 7/30/13 at 1:19 pm to Cecil D Diesel
I support this thread. Also,
Not a bad idea at all, would help with the dads/uncles who showup just to post highlights of kids who need exposure. The day we had the 2 elementary school Hispanic kids from SA doing drills is a primary example of this. Not one adjective from that sentence pertains to a "LSU Recruiting Board"
quote:
a poster should have X (amount can be determined by important people) amount of posts on the recruiting board before being allowed the ability to start threads..
Not a bad idea at all, would help with the dads/uncles who showup just to post highlights of kids who need exposure. The day we had the 2 elementary school Hispanic kids from SA doing drills is a primary example of this. Not one adjective from that sentence pertains to a "LSU Recruiting Board"
Posted on 7/30/13 at 2:01 pm to dreaux
I support this as well, although I'm not quite sure what exactly an admin can and cannot do.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 2:11 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
can
post porn
quote:
cannot do.
wear TD shirts in public
Page 6 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News