- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:48 am to UltimateHog
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:48 am to UltimateHog
quote:
From what I can tell the OC is quite poor on them as well as the serious heat issues Intel has developed
It probably is but OC is not turbo really. OC is simply taking it pass factory safe limits. Base and Turbo do not always have an understandable relationship with each other. Not always this plot-able thing.
quote:
It's getting bad, like real bad.
No comment. It wont be too bad on performance side but price/performance is retarded with Intel. Can't believe they aren't lowering prices.
The only thing that might help them this GEN is that on the server side, companies have already bought into their suites and programs. Like vPro requires a damn membership for support. That keeps ppl on Intel platforms for sometime.
2
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:50 am to LSU Coyote
quote:
It probably is but OC is not turbo really.
Obviously. You mentioned turbo but they didn't release that so not much to say. If you want to speculate the max turbo gain so far is 1GHz which would put it at 3.9 still below TR turbo at 4.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 9:52 am
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:53 am to UltimateHog
quote:
Obviously. You mentioned turbo but they didn't release that so not much to say. If you want to speculate the max turbo gain so far is 1GHz which would put it at 3.9 still below TR.
I thought you didn't like to speculate or go off rumors?
Only when it suites your narrative huh? Hmmm..
But yes, It probably will be around 3.8 - 4.0. Turbo 3.0 will probably hit 4.1-4.2 but that is only the best 2 cores, so not the whole package.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:55 am to LSU Coyote
I said if YOU want to, you mentioned turbo, I don't because they didn't release it as I said. 
TR turbo is 4.0 and XFR 4.1.
TR turbo is 4.0 and XFR 4.1.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 9:57 am
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:04 am to LSU Coyote
quote:
The only thing that might help them this GEN is that on the server side, companies have already bought into their suites and programs. Like vPro requires a damn membership for support. That keeps ppl on Intel platforms for sometime.
The thing here though is ARM is taking over with serious traction in that market.
Intel will post its worst growth in its history this year for data centers.
Intel isn't just starting to lose their arse on the desktop CPU side, there is a lot more to it than that.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 10:07 am
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:04 am to UltimateHog
quote:
600MHz slower than Threadrippers 12 core. Intel is just getting bent over
No point in comparing speeds on completely different architectures. When will we start seeing benchmarks for both of these chips?
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:06 am to bluebarracuda
I think videocardz has good reason.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:46 am to bluebarracuda
quote:
No point in comparing speeds on completely different architectures.
They are pretty far from each other since Intel has switched to shared L3 and larger L2, but still that is a little unsettling.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:51 am to LSU Coyote
Please take time to check this article out. Pretty funny stuff.
HardOCP - Top 5 Worst MOBOS
Funny thing is I own the lesser version of the GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD7 with the GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD5. IMO it is the best AM3+ I’ve owned. Through the AM3/+ platform years I’ve owned at less 10-12 different ATX/mATX boards. Nothing really came close to the quality of that board.
I’ve thought about upgrading to the UD7 several times but never did, glad the trigger wasn’t pulled. But.. come to think of it, several ppl here had that board and loved it. So the article is a little confusing for me.
quote:
The Top 5 Worst Motherboards of All Time We have been reviewing motherboards here at HardOCP for about 20 years now. And in that time, many have been flush with horrible features and bugs of all kinds. Dan takes a stroll down a very painful memory lane and rehashes his top five..as instructed by his therapist. Let it out Dan...let it out.
HardOCP - Top 5 Worst MOBOS
Funny thing is I own the lesser version of the GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD7 with the GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD5. IMO it is the best AM3+ I’ve owned. Through the AM3/+ platform years I’ve owned at less 10-12 different ATX/mATX boards. Nothing really came close to the quality of that board.
I’ve thought about upgrading to the UD7 several times but never did, glad the trigger wasn’t pulled. But.. come to think of it, several ppl here had that board and loved it. So the article is a little confusing for me.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:00 am to LSU Coyote
That's the only board I've been around for
All of the other ones are so old
All of the other ones are so old
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:12 am to bluebarracuda
This is funny... PCGamer 12 hours ago: The Wolf Among Us and Tales of the Borderlands won't get new seasons any time soon
30 minutes ago, new season announced.
30 minutes ago, new season announced.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:13 am to bluebarracuda
I remember that EVGA board but didn't own it. 2006 was my glory NewEgg cart dreamer years.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:14 am to UltimateHog
quote:
30 minutes ago, new season announced.
That is funny.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 12:21 pm to LSU Coyote
See, these are worst popular boards. Otherwise the entire list would be occupied by PC Chips.
Man, the list of mainstream mobo brands has shrunk a lot in the past decade. Most of the current ones were around back then but also competing with Abit, Shuttle, DFI, Jetway, Albatron, and many others I'm forgetting. ASUS was universally regarded as the best and a lot of people still think they are. Intel boards were prominent and mainstream, and Foxconn had its own brand alongside their Intel boards, and both were very good.
Man, the list of mainstream mobo brands has shrunk a lot in the past decade. Most of the current ones were around back then but also competing with Abit, Shuttle, DFI, Jetway, Albatron, and many others I'm forgetting. ASUS was universally regarded as the best and a lot of people still think they are. Intel boards were prominent and mainstream, and Foxconn had its own brand alongside their Intel boards, and both were very good.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 7/19/17 at 12:32 pm to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
Otherwise the entire list would be occupied by PC Chips.
How can anyone forget the nightmare? Who bought PC Chips? Was it ECS right? Or some shtty company like that.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 1:11 pm to LSU Coyote
quote:
Edt: Are you maxing out Steam servers? Think 100MB/s max them out in my region.
I just got 31.3MB/s so 250Mbps, average was probably about 28MB/s though.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 1:24 pm to UltimateHog
I also can't push myself to buy Destiny 2 for PS4. Really have to buy it on PC just because it was always the FPS I wanted on PC.
But fckk that community will be gone within the 1st fckking month.
But fckk that community will be gone within the 1st fckking month.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 1:36 pm to LSU Coyote
I won't get it at all most likely.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 1:37 pm to LSU Coyote
I'm getting it on pc
Posted on 7/19/17 at 1:40 pm to LSU Coyote
quote:
Was it ECS right? Or some shtty company like that.
ECS supposedly had one of the best Z77 boards for OCing, but I haven't heard anything since
Page 1365 of 1886
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News