Started By
Message

re: 'Games were supposed to be a fun career choice: Now I'm afraid I'll get murdered

Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:17 pm to
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167176 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Start popping people for this kind of behavior and its going to do a lot to curb it.



Yes because that has worked out well for all of our policies before. The war on drugs has been a raging success for example.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:18 pm to
quote:


Yes I can. Take the Curt Schilling story this week and the two guys that threatened to rape his daughter. Looking at the fat dumbass and the other guy involved, do you think they were going to get anywhere close to sniff her much less rape her?

They deserve what they got but let's be real about how hollow their threats were.




Until those fools were looked for and found out there was no way of truly knowing that.

Never mind that the shite they were saying pales in comparison to the things going on with what these other women are talking about.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167176 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

there was no way of truly knowing that.



Show me a link to where someone said they were going to rape someone on the internet and then actually followed through with it IRL?

That would be the dumbest criminal on the net.

quote:

Never mind that the shite they were saying pales in comparison to the things going on with what these other women are talking about.




It was still a threat. You can't pick and choose which ones are worse than others if you want to stick to your guns of taking all threats on the internet as serious.

Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

A kid went to jail over a joke on Facebook.



that "kid" was like 18 or 19 and thought it would be funny to talk about shooting up a kindergarten right after Newtown.

Sorry for not feeling sorry for the moron.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

It was still a threat. You can't pick and choose which ones are worse than others if you want to stick to your guns of taking all threats on the internet as serious.


No shite you cant. There was no way to know how dangerous they were.

That's WHY these people needed to be found, called out, and punished when they do this stuff.
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57801 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Sorry for not feeling sorry for the moron.
A lapse in judgement over a facebook post deserves 10 years in jail?
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Yes because that has worked out well for all of our policies before. The war on drugs has been a raging success for example.




apples and oranges man

there is a huge difference between saying it shouldn't be legal to THREATEN TO KILL AND RAPE vs arresting people and throwing them in jail for using drugs.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167176 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

No shite you cant.


You did just that though.


ETA:

Show me a link to where someone said they were going to rape someone on the internet and then actually followed through with it IRL?

This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 4:26 pm
Posted by CornDogCologne
AFUERA!
Member since Nov 2007
8718 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

apples and oranges man

there is a huge difference between saying it shouldn't be legal to THREATEN TO KILL AND RAPE vs arresting people and throwing them in jail for using drugs.


gotta stamp out that thoughtcrime. who cares if it stifles legitimate speech, amirite?

harsh policing and heavy handed government programs never had unintended consequences, not once.
This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 4:30 pm
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

A lapse in judgement over a facebook post deserves 10 years in jail?


10 years? No. Not in that instance. But he didn't get 10 years, he faced up to 10, and is still awaiting trial.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

You did just that though.


No, I said the level of what they did was not the same as what some of these women are dealing with.

She didnt get months of harassment like these other people.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

gotta stamp out that thoughtcrime. who cares if it stifles legitimate speech, amirite?


You think actually threatening a person with rape and or murder is just a thought crime?

So its cool with you if a person keeps telling your mother they are going to kill and rape her? That person is doing nothing wrong and is simply practicing legitimate speech?
Posted by CornDogCologne
AFUERA!
Member since Nov 2007
8718 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:34 pm to
there are two possible outcomes to this situation:

A) I get a mildly inconveniencing exchange with some stranger I will never meet.

B) We regulate the frick out of the internet and it becomes a caricature of itself because I'm an oversensitive pussy.

pick one.
This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 4:35 pm
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68487 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Start popping people for this kind of behavior and its going to do a lot to curb it.

So the "make an example of some of them and the masses will stop" approach. That has been tried and failed on numerous occasions. Drugs being one of them.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 5:04 pm to
again, you cant equate the so called war on drugs with continuing to allow people to have the "right" to constantly harass people with death threats, rape etc w/o repercussions.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58049 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 5:06 pm to
quote:


A) I get a mildly inconveniencing exchange with some stranger I will never meet.

B) We regulate the frick out of the internet and it becomes a caricature of itself because I'm an oversensitive pussy.




or we can go with option C and punish people who think its ok to constantly threaten people with death, rape, assault etc on the internet.

this doesnt have to be an all or nothing thing.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72051 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

this doesnt have to be an all or nothing thing.
Because that is never how it ends up.

Posted by CornDogCologne
AFUERA!
Member since Nov 2007
8718 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 5:13 pm to
Are there any documented cases where something like this was going on and the Internet tough guy actually went through with the actual rape or murder?


I can't think of any.
This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 5:14 pm
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68487 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

again, you cant equate the so called war on drugs with continuing to allow people to have the "right" to constantly harass people with death threats, rape etc w/o repercussions.

I'm just saying it wouldn't work. Not that people should have the right to harass people. But if they make laws to stop this, then it's going to take away certain freedoms that don't hurt people. And I can't support that.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167176 posts
Posted on 3/7/15 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

or we can go with option C and punish people who think its ok to constantly threaten people with death, rape, assault etc on the internet.

'

It is illegal and punishable but no way you can follow up on every stupid arse that tweets that out to someone.

It's also the classic bully scenario of if you ignore these guys then 99% of them go away. The issue is that the Zoe chick and Annita whatever her name didn't ignore it and they are patient zero for this stupid shite and others on both sides have jumped on board.

In fact, I would say that Anita chick intentionally keeps it stirred up so she has some sort of importance and has capitalized on it a lot. I bet she is making 6 figures off of interviews and speaking at all these conferences. Without keeping the controversy going she is a nobody again.
This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 5:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram