- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
we vetoed this trade today...
Posted on 9/20/15 at 11:50 pm
Posted on 9/20/15 at 11:50 pm
In my league my brothers team already has julio, AP, McCoy
Other team has Dez (inj), Hyde, Lynch
My bro picked up Terrance Williams off of the wire last week. He then convinces the other guy to trade lynch for williams to make up for the Dez injury. Are we wrong for vetoing for the sake of the league.
Other team has Dez (inj), Hyde, Lynch
My bro picked up Terrance Williams off of the wire last week. He then convinces the other guy to trade lynch for williams to make up for the Dez injury. Are we wrong for vetoing for the sake of the league.
19
Posted on 9/20/15 at 11:54 pm to Westlakeguy10
yeah, Williams isnt worth shite with Weeden as his QB
Posted on 9/20/15 at 11:56 pm to Westlakeguy10
No collusion, no veto imo
Posted on 9/20/15 at 11:56 pm to Westlakeguy10
Yes. You guys are absolutely wrong. That is not collusion. You are not fortune tellers. It is entirely possible that Williams out scores Lynch. Hell he scored more than double the points of Lynch today. I would be absolutely pissed if I were one of those traders. Heck the guy getting Lynch may have changed his mind after today if Romo didn't get hurt.
This post was edited on 9/20/15 at 11:59 pm
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:24 am to Westlakeguy10
The sake of the league really?
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:31 am to Westlakeguy10
quote:yes
Are we wrong for vetoing for the sake of the league.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 6:43 am to Westlakeguy10
You don't veto because someone is an idiot.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 7:59 am to Westlakeguy10
quote:
Are we wrong for vetoing for the sake of the league
You hurt your league by doing this. If I were in it I wouldn't come back after this season.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:06 am to Westlakeguy10
A waiver wire WR is worth a 1st round RB.
Said no one ever.
Said no one ever.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:14 am to Westlakeguy10
OP is a fa____t
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:16 am to Westlakeguy10
I am almost always against a veto unless there is collusion involved. However, I am torn here because of how incredibly stupid this trade is. The fact that your brother has other great players on his team already is irrelevant. But at some point, the competitive spirit of the league needs to be protected, in my opinion.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:21 am to Westlakeguy10
quote:
My bro picked up Terrance Williams off of the wire last week. He then convinces the other guy to trade lynch for williams to make up for the Dez injury.
That's just a solid FF move right there
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:29 am to Dan Bilzerian
While I would consider finding another league next year, if I paid to be in this league then I would probably veto it. Its a bullshite trade, and I would raise hell over it.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:33 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
You don't veto because someone is an idiot
What if he convinced this idiot that Lynch for Cole Beasley was a good trade? Or Lynch for Devin Street? Or what if he convinced him that Randy Moss would come out of retirement soon and got him to agree to that? At some point it is so stupid that it needs to be vetoed. No one wants to play in a league where dumb shite like that is allowed.
I'm torn on whether Terrance Williams with Weeden at the helm is the breaking point, but it's close.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:42 am to Westlakeguy10
let me ask you, what is your buy in for the league?
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:58 am to Westlakeguy10
LOL at the "must be collusion to veto" crowd
Are you going to go through people's texts to prove something is collusion? Or just never veto anything?
This is borderline because Williams is a bit of an unknown and has potential...but substitute Williams for Cole Beasley or Allen Hurns and that trade needs to be vetoed. Extremely lopsided trades hurt the league as a whole.
Are you going to go through people's texts to prove something is collusion? Or just never veto anything?
This is borderline because Williams is a bit of an unknown and has potential...but substitute Williams for Cole Beasley or Allen Hurns and that trade needs to be vetoed. Extremely lopsided trades hurt the league as a whole.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:02 am to Westlakeguy10
I don't care if a kicker was traded for Lynch...if there is no collusion, a trade should never be vetoed. Let the shitty manager learn from his mistakes.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:18 am to Westlakeguy10
Let it go through.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:22 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
yeah, Williams isnt worth shite with Weeden as his QB
Weeden threw Williams a 42 yd td
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:30 am to Westlakeguy10
It is not the leagues job to determine whether or not a trade should be made or not, except in the case of collusion. That's a chicken shite move by you and the rest of the league imo.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News